Jump to content

File:Cincinnati Bus Diagram 2011.png

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons
From Wikibooks, open books for an open world

Original file (3,500 × 2,714 pixels, file size: 2.12 MB, MIME type: image/png)

Summary

Description
English: This is a diagram of bus lines in Greater Cincinnati that run throughout the day. This project started in response to my frustration with the lack of a legible regional transit map. Basically, the map reads as such: thicker lines represent more frequent service, thinner less. The thinker a line is, the less time you will need to wait for a bus to come. For thin lines, check a schedule unless you have an hour or more to spend waiting. Distances are not to scale; use the white dots to approximate time between two points. The space between two white dots represents ten minutes. To find aproximate total time to your destination, refer to the legend to find exact frequency. Divide that in half and multiply the number of dots you'll travel past on your line by ten. Add those two numbers and you get the average wait time plus the approximate travel time. That is your approximate one way travel time.

The Cincinnati Frequent Transit Map is a project that grew out of my frustration with the absence of any legible description of Greater Cincinnati's transit system. I first began tinkering with Cincinnati's transit data in late 2010. I wanted to get clear in my own mind just what services were useful, what neighborhoods had better transit service, and how they were all connected. SORTA, the primary transit agency serving the region, hadn't published a system map in over four years. The map on their website was not only inaccurate, but so hard to read that most new riders were scared off.

After a couple days of entering most of the data from paper route schedules into GIS over a shapefile of regional streets I was able to see the basic structure of transit system. I included rough data drawn from the schedules on frequency and was able to highlight areas with more frequent service. I was intrigued by what I found, so I started drawing some simple sketches, at first just the most frequent routes. After getting some positive feedback I ran with it. I started including more routes and details. I reduced the wild curves of Cincinnati's hilly streets to 45 degree angles and smooth corners. By analyzing GIS data for all of the region's buildings, zoning codes, and census data, I was able to include meaningful information about the location of neighborhood boundaries and business districts. By reading schedules one at a time, I was able to give a rough estimate of the time between two points on a given route.

As I poured more effort into the project I decided I couldn't leave it as just an academic exercise. A couple of recommendations led me to Kickstarter.com, a website that helps to raise money for creative projects. After just five days I had raised over $1,200. Less than a month later, I had raised $2,300 with the support of more than a hundred donors from Cincinnati and around the world. That money was used to print 30,000 pocket-sized maps and several hundred posters.

Those maps have now been distributed by individuals, businesses and organizations around Greater Cincinnati. The University of Cincinnati even printed 6,000 of their own maps for their freshman class, the Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County has maps at their branch locations and both regional transit agencies are distributing the maps directly to their customers.

The map is a diagrammatic illustration of the Greater Cincinnati's transit system that shows where, when, and how one can travel by bus. It's nearer to New York City's Subway Map or that of London's Tube in design than to the more to-scale and more difficult to read maps of most Midwestern cities. Like the New York map, this map highlights the important frequent and convenient transit lines over services that are infrequent, specialized or too complex to readily apprehend.

The map articulates not only where routes go in relation to each other and their context, but by including temporal information, how long you can expect to wait for a bus. The basic idea behind a frequency map is that transit service doesn't only exist in space, but in time. You may know the line you want is on Vine Street, but you can't expect to catch the bus at midnight the same way you can at noon. A bus map that locates routes in space but not in time is not very valuable unless it is accompanied by schedules for every route. And that's just not very convenient.

Ultimately, I hope to allow people to understand what good service exists, and where it can take them so that they can not only begin to use public transit, but understand it in a way that lets them have an informed discussion about how to improve it. You can hardly demand better transit service when you don't know what you have!
Date
Source Own work
Author Nate Wessel
Permission
(Reusing this file)
CC-BY-SA
Other versions

http://www.cincymap.org File:Cincinnati_Frequent_Transit_Map.png

File:Cincinnati_Bus_Diagram_2011_Back.png

Licensing

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Items portrayed in this file

depicts

1 August 2012

image/png

e19c80315a1e197eae1bd8e17f43cbdd063960e3

2,227,779 byte

2,714 pixel

3,500 pixel

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 10 | ) (10 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current17:14, 1 September 2012Thumbnail for version as of 17:14, 1 September 20123,500 × 2,714 (2.12 MB)Nate WesselMinor updates to route thickness, text placement.
20:05, 19 February 2012Thumbnail for version as of 20:05, 19 February 20123,052 × 2,358 (1.82 MB)Nate WesselSome minor modifications for route changes by SORTA.
12:56, 15 May 2011Thumbnail for version as of 12:56, 15 May 20113,053 × 2,359 (1.8 MB)Nate Wesselmajor colour changes. Trying to make the colours indicative to the type of route to the extent possible while maintaining visual continuity.
21:55, 10 May 2011Thumbnail for version as of 21:55, 10 May 20113,053 × 2,359 (1.75 MB)Nate WesselImproved legend!
02:26, 10 May 2011Thumbnail for version as of 02:26, 10 May 20113,053 × 2,359 (1.76 MB)Nate Wesseladding parks
00:55, 9 May 2011Thumbnail for version as of 00:55, 9 May 20113,053 × 2,359 (1.76 MB)Nate Wesselcolour changes to parks and institutions. Added a couple of parks, added routes #39 and #28. Extended zone 2 line to edges of map. Changed river colour.
13:46, 5 May 2011Thumbnail for version as of 13:46, 5 May 20113,053 × 2,359 (1.69 MB)Nate Wesselaligned title, added new 19 route segment(previously 18)
23:08, 2 May 2011Thumbnail for version as of 23:08, 2 May 20113,053 × 2,359 (1.66 MB)Nate Wesseladded labels for routes that continue off-map, finished KY
20:47, 29 April 2011Thumbnail for version as of 20:47, 29 April 20113,053 × 2,359 (1.61 MB)Nate WesselRearranged Kentucky to be more geographically accurate.
18:28, 24 April 2011Thumbnail for version as of 18:28, 24 April 20113,053 × 2,359 (1.54 MB)Nate WesselExtended 78 and 4-blue ash to map limits. Added mill creek.
(newest | oldest) View (newer 10 | ) (10 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Global file usage

Metadata