This project page is move-protected.

Wikibooks:Reading room/Technical Assistance

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ArchivesWikibooks Discussion Rooms
Discussions Assistance Requests Announcements
General | Proposals | Projects | Featured books General | Technical | Administrative Deletion | Undeletion | Import | Permissions Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Technical Assistance reading room. Get assistance on questions related to MediaWiki markup, CSS, JavaScript, and such as they relate to Wikibooks. This is not a general-purpose technical support room.

To submit a bug notice or feature request for the MediaWiki software, visit Phabricator.

To get more information about the MediaWiki software, or to download your own copy, visit MediaWiki

There are also two IRC channels for technical help: #mediawikiconnect for issues about the software, and #mediawiki-coreconnect for WMF server or configuration issues.

Can someone else please sit down and resolve the misnesting in this, or remove the formatting so it's de-linted? It's taken me 5 attempts so far, and the efforts still fail, leaving missing, stripped or misnested tags, despite a LOT of effort being put in. I'd rather not waste my time further. ShakespeareFan00 (discusscontribs) 00:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can some one please refer me to a referee so that I can have more than 20 hours worth of work restored that ShakespeareFan has destroyed! I have noted that I am not the first person who has noted this about ShakespeareFan, no mention is made of the monstroous amount of time that they destroyed, without any knowledge of the subject matter, sorry if I am irritated let's put this time, I am doing my best to be restrained!!!! Boris1951zz (discusscontribs) 20:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
nOTE"Can you stop applying your "lint" change when you've been reverted once already please. I am the main editor of the book Understanding Air Safety in the Jet Age and I prefer to work on it in the style I am using, not with the non-content changes you have made. It is not good practice to repeatedly revert, without a meaningful edit summary, when the changes you are making are cosmetic and not contributing to the content of the book. Thanks - QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 16:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
@QuiteUnusual: Apologies. I was working from the reported lint concerns at Special:LintErrors page, I hadn't noticed that you HAD previously reverted (and nothing about the previous revert is visible in my notifications).
ShakespeareFan00 (discuss • contribs) 17:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
The intended 'repair' was to resolve :
''<big>Welcome to the Wikibook on''<br /><br /><big>'''Understanding Air Safety in the Jet Age'''</big></big>''
which I felt should be <big>''Welcome to the Wikibook on''<br /><br /><big>'''Understanding Air Safety in the Jet Age'''</big></big>''
because it is good practice that any formatting has to be nested.
<Big>...</Big> is also nominally deprecated in more recent versions of HTML, and whilst it currently works, it will at some point be removed from HTML, at which point pages using it will not necessarily be presented as intended. A better approach would be define a {{big}} template that can be updated accordingly.
However, as you define 'repairs' like these as cosmetic, I am considering if I actually want to help improve Wikibooks if such contributions are likey to provoke concerns from other contributors. ShakespeareFan00 (discuss • contribs) 17:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
@QuiteUnusual: While the change is indeed cosmetic, the intention is good - lint errors are a huge issue that often manifest years later (as I've fixed many of the old Steward requests that had this issue). I personally think that his change was appropriate as a result, despite it looking "trivial and pointless" (the latter of which is not true in my opinion, and the former is true but not a mistake). Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 17:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Okay I withdraw the trivial and pointless comments, sorry. The principle problem for me was the changing of the whitespace which I'd deliberately included during editing as I find it easier to read. I will make the fixes you suggested above manually. Thanks QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 09:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
And to be clear @ShakespeareFan00: I'm not suggesting that the work you are doing is a problem or that you should stop just that you should watch for any feedback from editors. I doubt there will be much. I'm surprised that you didn't get a notification automatically.
Note, however, I do consider it a problem, a major problem!!!! Boris1951zz (discusscontribs) 22:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm not going to argue this, but if there was a loss of any actual content it was unintended. If someone else had undertaking the delinting earlier, my efforts would not have been needed. Can you give specific page where actual content as opposed to formatting may have been lost during the delinting process?

ShakespeareFan00 (discusscontribs) 22:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore , you've caused me enough concerns that I no longer wish to continue editing on this project. Goodbye.

ShakespeareFan00 (discusscontribs) 22:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've also reverted a considerable portion of my delinting-efforts. If another contributor thinks any of these were in fact good edits, I won't object to their reinstatment after careful consideration by that contributor.ShakespeareFan00 (discusscontribs) 05:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
So it seems you eventually found the error, a comment added during attempts to delint, I should have checked for this myself, and thanks for removing it. However, if something that a calm analysis of past edits (and debugging commenting is sometimes overlooked) would have found is going to provoke claims of destroyed work, it's paerhaps better if I do not continue editing? ShakespeareFan00 (discusscontribs) 19:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Boris1951zz: I'm not sure what the issue is? Leaderboard (discusscontribs) 14:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Infoboxes?

[edit source]

Infoboxes on Wikisource are displaying weirdly for me – the caption text doesn't appear to break, so if the caption is longer than the image, the infobox gets very wide. You can see this at User:Cremastra/sandbox (compare with the infoboxes at w:en:User:Cremastra/sandbox). Any ideas what the problem is? Thanks, Cremastra (discusscontribs) 13:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

It might be related to this slew of problems on enWP. Cremastra (discusscontribs) 11:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply