Acing the SQE/Contract Law
Core principles of contract law
[edit | edit source]Formation
[edit | edit source]In English contract law, formation refers to the creation of a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. For a contract to be valid and enforceable, it must satisfy several key elements. These elements are:
offer and acceptance
[edit | edit source]An offer is a clear, unequivocal proposal made by one party (the offeror) to another (the offeree) with the intention of being bound by it once the offeree accepts. • The offer must be specific and capable of acceptance. • Offers can be terminated through rejection, revocation, lapse of time, or counteroffer. Acceptance
• Acceptance is an unqualified agreement to the terms of the offer. • It must be communicated clearly, either explicitly (e.g., verbally or in writing) or implicitly (e.g., through conduct). • Acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer (the “mirror image rule”). Any variation might constitute a counteroffer rather than acceptance.
Some leading cases are: • Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893): Demonstrates offer and acceptance in a unilateral contract. Hyde v Wrench (1840): Establishes the mirror image rule and the effect of a counteroffer. • Currie v Misa (1875): Defines consideration as a detriment to the promisee or a benefit to the promisor.
consideration
[edit | edit source]Consideration refers to the “price” paid for the promise made in the contract. It involves an exchange of value, such as money, services, goods, or promises. • It must be sufficient but need not be adequate. For example, a small or nominal consideration can suffice, but it must have some value in law. • Past consideration (an act performed before the promise is made) is generally not valid, except in specific exceptions.
intention to create legal relations
[edit | edit source]• The parties must intend for their agreement to have legal consequences. • In commercial agreements, there is a presumption of intent to create legal relations, unless expressly stated otherwise. • In social or domestic arrangements, there is usually no such presumption unless evidence shows otherwise.
certainty
[edit | edit source]• The terms of the agreement must be clear and complete enough for the court to enforce. • Ambiguities or omissions in key terms may render the contract void.
capacity
[edit | edit source]The parties entering the contract must have the legal capacity to do so (e.g., they must be of sound mind and not minors, with some exceptions for necessities).
Parties
[edit | edit source]privity of contract
[edit | edit source]rights of third parties
[edit | edit source]Contract terms
[edit | edit source]express terms
[edit | edit source]incorporation of terms
[edit | edit source]terms implied by common law and statute
[edit | edit source]exemption clauses
[edit | edit source]Section 3 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) will apply and the exemption clause will be valid if reasonable (reasonableness test).