Jump to content

Acing the SQE/Contract Law

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world

Core principles of contract law

[edit | edit source]

Formation

[edit | edit source]

In English contract law, formation refers to the creation of a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. For a contract to be valid and enforceable, it must satisfy several key elements. These elements are:

offer and acceptance

[edit | edit source]

An offer is a clear, unequivocal proposal made by one party (the offeror) to another (the offeree) with the intention of being bound by it once the offeree accepts. • The offer must be specific and capable of acceptance. • Offers can be terminated through rejection, revocation, lapse of time, or counteroffer. Acceptance

• Acceptance is an unqualified agreement to the terms of the offer. • It must be communicated clearly, either explicitly (e.g., verbally or in writing) or implicitly (e.g., through conduct). • Acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer (the “mirror image rule”). Any variation might constitute a counteroffer rather than acceptance.

Some leading cases are: • Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893): Demonstrates offer and acceptance in a unilateral contract. Hyde v Wrench (1840): Establishes the mirror image rule and the effect of a counteroffer. • Currie v Misa (1875): Defines consideration as a detriment to the promisee or a benefit to the promisor.

consideration

[edit | edit source]

Consideration refers to the “price” paid for the promise made in the contract. It involves an exchange of value, such as money, services, goods, or promises. • It must be sufficient but need not be adequate. For example, a small or nominal consideration can suffice, but it must have some value in law. • Past consideration (an act performed before the promise is made) is generally not valid, except in specific exceptions.

[edit | edit source]

• The parties must intend for their agreement to have legal consequences. • In commercial agreements, there is a presumption of intent to create legal relations, unless expressly stated otherwise. • In social or domestic arrangements, there is usually no such presumption unless evidence shows otherwise.

certainty

[edit | edit source]

• The terms of the agreement must be clear and complete enough for the court to enforce. • Ambiguities or omissions in key terms may render the contract void.

capacity

[edit | edit source]

The parties entering the contract must have the legal capacity to do so (e.g., they must be of sound mind and not minors, with some exceptions for necessities).

Parties

[edit | edit source]

privity of contract

[edit | edit source]

rights of third parties

[edit | edit source]

Contract terms

[edit | edit source]

express terms

[edit | edit source]

incorporation of terms

[edit | edit source]

terms implied by common law and statute

[edit | edit source]

exemption clauses

[edit | edit source]

Section 3 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) will apply and the exemption clause will be valid if reasonable (reasonableness test).

the interpretation of contract terms (conditions, warranties and innominate terms)

[edit | edit source]

variation

[edit | edit source]

Vitiating factors

[edit | edit source]

misrepresentation

[edit | edit source]

mistake

[edit | edit source]

unfair contract terms

[edit | edit source]

duress and undue influence

[edit | edit source]

illegality

[edit | edit source]

Termination

[edit | edit source]

expiry or other specified event

[edit | edit source]

breach

[edit | edit source]

frustration

[edit | edit source]

basic principles of restitution and unjust enrichment in the context of termination of contract

[edit | edit source]

Remedies

[edit | edit source]

damages

[edit | edit source]

liquidated sums and penalties

[edit | edit source]

specific performance

[edit | edit source]

injunctions

[edit | edit source]

duty to mitigate

[edit | edit source]

indemnities

[edit | edit source]

guarantees

[edit | edit source]

Causation and remoteness

[edit | edit source]