Analytic Number Theory/Dirichlet series
For the remainder of this book, we shall use Riemann's convention of denoting complex numbers:
Definition
[edit | edit source]Definition 5.1:
Let be an arithmetic function. Then the Dirichlet series associated to is the series
- ,
where ranges over the complex numbers.
Convergence considerations
[edit | edit source]Theorem 5.2 (abscissa of absolute convergence):
Let be an arithmetic function such that the series of absolute values associated to the Dirichlet series associated to
neither diverges at all nor converges for all . Then there exists , called the abscissa of absolute convergence, such that the Dirichlet series associated to converges absolutely for all , and it's associated series of absolute values diverges for all , .
Proof:
Denote by the set of all real numbers such that
diverges. Due to the assumption, this set is neither empty nor equal to . Further, if , then for all and all , since
and due to the comparison test. It follows that has a supremum. Let be that supremum. By definition, for we have convergence, and if we had convergence for we would have found a lower upper bound due to the above argument, contradicting the definition of .
Theorem 5.3 (abscissa of conditional convergence):
Formulas
[edit | edit source]Theorem 8.4 (Euler product):
Let be a strongly multiplicative function, and let such that the corresponding Dirichlet series converges absolutely. Then for that series we have the formula
- .
Proof:
This follows directly from theorem 2.11 and the fact that strongly multiplicative strongly multiplicative.