Let us now define what complex differentiability is.
- Example 2.3.2
The function
is nowhere complex differentiable.
- Proof
Let be arbitrary. Assume that is complex differentiable at , i.e. that
exists.
We choose
Due to lemma 2.2.3, which is applicable since of course is open, we have:
But
a contradiction.
We can define a natural bijective function from to as follows:
In fact, is a vector space isomorphism between and .
The inverse of is given by
Theorem and definitions 2.3.3:
Let be open, let be a function and let . If is complex differentiable at , then the functions
are well-defined, differentiable at and satisfy the equations
These equations are called the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
- Proof
1. We prove well-definedness of .
Let . We apply the inverse function on both sides to obtain:
where the last equality holds since is bijective (for any bijective we have if ; see exercise 1).
3. We prove differentiability of and and the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
We define
Then we have:
From these equations follows the existence of , since for example
exists due to lemma 2.2.3.
The proof for
and the existence of we leave for exercise 2.
- Let be sets such that , and let be a bijective function. Prove that .
- Let be open, let be a function and let . Prove that if is complex differentiable at , then and exist and satisfy the equation .
Next