Jump to content

Fukushima Aftermath/Public health impacts of nuclear power plants

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world

Relative human exposure from nuclear vs. fossil fuels

[edit | edit source]

Relative radiation exposures

  • Nuclear .004
  • Natural terrestrial radiation 240
  • Naturally occurring in human body (bones, etc.) 40

Japan and the Future of Nuclear Energy [1]

Public health impacts

[edit | edit source]

The public health effects of a nuclear power plant are far less than that of coal, lignite, oil, gas and even photovoltaic. [2][3][4] Only wind power weighs in with lower numbers in terms of the parameters of

  • years of life lost
  • respiratory hospital admissions
  • cerbrovascular hospital admissions (stroke)
  • congestive heart failure
  • and others.

In terms of lost activity days, the comparisons were stark:

  • 1303 for coal
  • 12,248 for oil
  • 1446 for gas
  • 1977 for photovoltaic
  • 314 nuclear.

Similar results obtained for years of life lost

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. Burton Richter director emeritus SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (April 11, 2011). Japan and the Future of Nuclear Energy (video conference). Stanford University. {{cite book}}: |format= requires |url= (help)
  2. Kerwitt; et al. Public Health Impacts per TWh. Germany. {{cite book}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  3. "Risk Analysis". 18 (4). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. Burton Richter director emeritus SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (April 11, 2011). Japan and the Future of Nuclear Energy (video conference). Stanford University. {{cite book}}: |format= requires |url= (help)