How to Ace FYLSE/Torts MCQ
Appearance
Products Liability
[edit | edit source]Egg skull P was injured by D’s product sold by S. The warning on the label was inadequate.
In Negligence P v. D, D wins under if:
- (A) P didn’t read the label.
- (B) The injury was not reasonably foreseeable by D.
- (C) 3rd P made the product.
- (D) D didn’t know P was egg skull
Products Liability
[edit | edit source]Egg skull P was injured by D’s product sold by S. The warning on the product label was inadequate.
In SL P v. D, P wins if:
- (A) D is negligent.
- (B) possibility of Injury well known (I)
- (C) consumer expectation test is met.
- (D) possibility of Injury well known (II)
Products Liability
[edit | edit source]Egg skull P was injured by D’s product sold by S. The product label said safe for normal person.
In P v. S, P wins if:
- (A) manufacturer’s negligence equals commercial supplier’s.
- (B) defective
- (C) breached express warranty.
- (D) breached a duty
Negligence
[edit | edit source]P was at D's house and C injured P.
In negligence P v. D, P wins if:
- (A) D knew it's unsafe.
- (B) P knew it's unsafe.
- (C) P was invitee of D
- (D) A crime occurred recently.
Misrepresentation
[edit | edit source]D hide a fact to P.
In misrepresentation P v. D, who wins?
- (A) D, b/c P thought it was.
- (B) D, b/c P permitted.
- (C) P, b/c P breached the duty to disclose.
- (D) P, if D had a duty to disclose.