Proof: Assume that not
for all
. Then there exists a least
(call it
) such that
. Consider the function
,
which is defined on at least
. Since
for
, the power series
starts at
. Therefore,

is a well-defined function on
which is also continuous due to the continuity of power series. Moreover,
,
and by continuity of
, there exists a
such that
for all
. But by definition,
,
so that we have for
that
and consequently
, and hence
. But this contradicts the assumption that
was an accumulation point of
.
Example (falsity of the identity theorem for multi-dimensional power series):
For multi-dimensional power series, that is power series of the type
for a
,
the set
may have
as an accumulation point even when
does not vanish. An easy example (which works in any dimension
) is
and
.
Theorem (Abel's theorem):
Let

be a real or complex power series of convergence radius
, and suppose that
.
Then
.
{{proof|By Abelian partial summation, we have

for
and
, where we denote as usual
.
Substituting
, we get
.
We then put