, then
Either
, which means
or
, which means that
.
Note that the two middle terms do no appear to match, but if you follow the logical development in each term, you will see that there is a matching additive inverse for each term on both sides.
Use the same method as iv, expand the expression and cancel.
implies that
and thus
. Step 4 requires division by
and thus is an invalid step.
All values of x satisfy the inequality, since it can be rewritten as
, and
for all x.
If
, then
.
Thus,
, or
.
cannot be factored in its current form, so we first turn a part of the expression into a perfect square:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aec07/aec07cb0e7a1f6394c49d7ec6a6544afe7eb9d3c" alt="{\displaystyle (x^{2}-2x+1)+1>0\,}"
We then complete the square on
, so now we have the expression:
, which is positive for all values of x.
If
, then
.
Thus
, or
.
Complete the square:
Thus,
.
Solve for
first, then consider the third factor
for both cases, giving us
, or
, or
If
, then taking the base 2 logarithm on both sides:
NOTE: The answer in the 3rd Edition provides
or
. Plugging in values
, e.g. 10, gives us
, so I think this is a misprint or an incorrect answer.
If
, then
, which is only positive when
since
.
, which is true since
, therefore
.
, therefore
.
, therefore
.
If
or
are 0, then by definition
.
Otherwise, we have already proved that
for
, therefore if
,
is true.
If
, then
since
.
If
, then
. Since
, we have
.