, then
Either , which means or , which means that .
Note that the two middle terms do no appear to match, but if you follow the logical development in each term, you will see that there is a matching additive inverse for each term on both sides.
Use the same method as iv, expand the expression and cancel.
implies that and thus . Step 4 requires division by and thus is an invalid step.
All values of x satisfy the inequality, since it can be rewritten as , and for all x.
If , then .
Thus, , or .
cannot be factored in its current form, so we first turn a part of the expression into a perfect square:
We then complete the square on , so now we have the expression:
- , which is positive for all values of x.
If , then .
Thus , or .
Complete the square:
Thus, .
Solve for first, then consider the third factor for both cases, giving us , or
, or
If , then taking the base 2 logarithm on both sides:
NOTE: The answer in the 3rd Edition provides or . Plugging in values , e.g. 10, gives us , so I think this is a misprint or an incorrect answer.
If , then , which is only positive when since .
, which is true since
, therefore .
, therefore .
, therefore .
If or are 0, then by definition .
Otherwise, we have already proved that for , therefore if , is true.
If , then since .
If , then . Since , we have .