In the same year that Erwin Schrödinger published the equation that now bears his name, the nonrelativistic theory was completed by Max Born's insight that the Schrödinger wave function
is actually nothing but a tool for calculating probabilities, and that the probability of detecting a particle "described by"
in a region of space
is given by the volume integral
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27dac/27dac09f36d2508f201511364849cbac90cc4388" alt="{\displaystyle \int _{R}|\psi (t,\mathbf {r} )|^{2}\,d^{3}r=\int _{R}\psi ^{*}\psi \,d^{3}r}"
— provided that the appropriate measurement is made, in this case a test for the particle's presence in
. Since the probability of finding the particle somewhere (no matter where) has to be 1, only a square integrable function can "describe" a particle. This rules out
which is not square integrable. In other words, no particle can have a momentum so sharp as to be given by
times a wave vector
, rather than by a genuine probability distribution over different momenta.
Given a probability density function
, we can define the expected value
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/562b3/562b3179d4db5ce3699913901c602798a5ace142" alt="{\displaystyle \langle x\rangle =\int |\psi (x)|^{2}\,x\,dx=\int \psi ^{*}\,x\,\psi \,dx}"
and the standard deviation
as well as higher moments of
. By the same token,
and data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdce3/bdce3bc515eb2d9eb371339bb4b1471f5cf72762" alt="{\displaystyle \Delta k={\sqrt {\int |{\overline {\psi }}|^{2}(k-\langle k\rangle )^{2}}}.}"
Here is another expression for
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/476c0/476c04356a756b8624ee94be5b1224ce8e1c454f" alt="{\displaystyle \langle k\rangle =\int \psi ^{*}(x)\left(-i{\frac {d}{dx}}\right)\psi (x)\,dx.}"
To check that the two expressions are in fact equal, we plug
into the latter expression:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b4fa/3b4fa54a445e2a87ea5622bb1647f5c9fc92ab0b" alt="{\displaystyle \langle k\rangle ={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\pi }}}\int \psi ^{*}(x)\left(-i{\frac {d}{dx}}\right)\int {\overline {\psi }}(k)\,e^{ikx}dk\,dx={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\pi }}}\int \psi ^{*}(x)\int {\overline {\psi }}(k)\,k\,e^{ikx}dk\,dx.}"
Next we replace
by
and shuffle the integrals with the mathematical nonchalance that is common in physics:
![{\displaystyle \langle k\rangle =\int \!\int {\overline {\psi }}\,^{*}(k')\,k\,{\overline {\psi }}(k)\left[{\frac {1}{2\pi }}\int e^{i(k-k')x}dx\right]dk\,dk'.}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/eeb26219d324cc48516a301db11ad6b4a291924a)
The expression in square brackets is a representation of Dirac's delta distribution
the defining characteristic of which is
for any continuous function
(In case you didn't notice, this proves what was to be proved.)
In the same annus mirabilis of quantum mechanics, 1926, Werner Heisenberg proved the so-called "uncertainty" relation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/066cb/066cb832bfd14c54f6e870d1dd6a7578d6e73448" alt="{\displaystyle \Delta x\,\Delta p\geq \hbar /2.}"
Heisenberg spoke of Unschärfe, the literal translation of which is "fuzziness" rather than "uncertainty". Since the relation
is a consequence of the fact that
and
are related to each other via a Fourier transformation, we leave the proof to the mathematicians. The fuzziness relation for position and momentum follows via
. It says that the fuzziness of a position (as measured by
) and the fuzziness of the corresponding momentum (as measured by
) must be such that their product equals at least