We know that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25b39/25b3915522535aa80f794c98f8fb78a5376201e2" alt="{\displaystyle \sin ^{2}\theta =1-\cos ^{2}\theta \,}"
So do we really need the
function?
Or put another way, could we have worked out all our interesting formulas for things like
in terms just of
and then derived every formula that has a
in it from that?
The answer is yes.
We don't need to have one geometric argument for
and then do another geometric argument for
. We could get our formulas for
directly from formulas for
To find a formula for
in terms of
and
: construct two different right angle triangles each drawn with side
having the same length of one, but with
, and therefore angle
. Scale up triangle two so that side
is the same length as side
. Place the triangles so that side
is coincidental with side
, and the angles
and
are juxtaposed to form angle
at the origin. The circumference of the circle within which triangle two is embedded (circle 2) crosses side
at point
, allowing a third right angle to be drawn from angle
to point
. Now reset the scale of the entire figure so that side
is considered to be of length 1. Side
coincidental with side
will then be of length
, and so side
will be of length
in which length lies point
. Draw a line parallel to line
through the right angle of triangle two to produce a fourth right angle triangle, this one embedded in triangle two. Triangle 4 is a scaled copy of triangle 1, because:
(1) it is right angled, and
(2)
.
The length of side
is
as
. Thus point
is located at length:
where
giving us the "Cosine Angle Sum Formula".
We can apply this formula immediately to sum two equal angles:
(I)
where
From the theorem of Pythagoras we know that:
in this case:
where
Substituting into (I) gives:
where
which is identical to the "Cosine Double Angle Sum Formula":
Armed with this definition of the
function, we can restate the Theorem of Pythagoras for a right angled triangle with side c of length one, from:
where
to:
We can also restate the "Cosine Angle Sum Formula" from:
where
to:
The price we have to pay for the notational convenience of this new function
is that we now have to answer questions like: Is there a "Sine Angle Sum Formula". Such questions can always be answered by taking the
form and selectively replacing
by
and then using algebra to simplify the resulting equation. Applying this technique to the "Cosine Angle Sum Formula" produces:
-- Pythagoras on left, multiply out right hand side
-- Carefully selected Pythagoras again on the left hand side
-- Multiplied out
-- Carefully selected Pythagoras
-- Algebraic simplification
taking the square root of both sides produces the "Sine Angle Sum Formula"
We can use a similar technique to find the "Sine Half Angle Formula" from the "Cosine Half Angle Formula":
We know that
, so squaring both sides of the "Cosine Half Angle Formula" and subtracting from one:
So far so good, but we still have a
to get rid of. Use Pythagoras again to get the "Sine Half Angle Formula":
or perhaps a little more legibly as: