In the last two chapters, we have studied test function spaces and distributions. In this chapter we will demonstrate a method to obtain solutions to linear partial differential equations which uses test function spaces and distributions.
In the last chapter, we had defined multiplication of a distribution with a smooth function and derivatives of distributions. Therefore, for a distribution
, we are able to calculate such expressions as

for a smooth function
and a
-dimensional multiindex
. We therefore observe that in a linear partial differential equation of the form

we could insert any distribution
instead of
in the left hand side. However, equality would not hold in this case, because on the right hand side we have a function, but the left hand side would give us a distribution (as finite sums of distributions are distributions again due to exercise 4.1; remember that only finitely many
are allowed to be nonzero, see definition 1.2). If we however replace the right hand side by
(the regular distribution corresponding to
), then there might be distributions
which satisfy the equation. In this case, we speak of a distributional solution. Let's summarise this definition in a box.
Definition 5.2:
Let
be open and let

be a linear partial differential equation. If
has the two properties
is continuous and
,
we call
a fundamental solution for that partial differential equation.
For the definition of
see exercise 4.5.
Proof:
Let
be the support of
. For
, let us denote the supremum norm of the function
by
.
For
or
,
is identically zero and hence a distribution. Hence, we only need to treat the case where both
and
.
For each
,
is a compact set since it is bounded and closed. Therefore, we may cover
by finitely many pairwise disjoint sets
with diameter at most
(for convenience, we choose these sets to be subsets of
). Furthermore, we choose
.
For each
, we define

, which is a finite linear combination of distributions and therefore a distribution (see exercise 4.1).
Let now
and
be arbitrary. We choose
such that for all
.
This we may do because continuous functions are uniformly continuous on compact sets. Further, we choose
such that
.
This we may do due to dominated convergence. Since for
,
. Thus, the claim follows from theorem AI.33.
Theorem 5.4:
Let
be open, let

be a linear partial differential equation such that
is integrable and has compact support. Let
be a fundamental solution of the PDE. Then

is a distribution which is a distributional solution for the partial differential equation.
Proof: Since by the definition of fundamental solutions the function
is continuous for all
, lemma 5.3 implies that
is a distribution.
Further, by definitions 4.16,
.
Lemma 5.5:
Let
,
,
and
. Then
.
Proof:
By theorem 4.21 2., for all
.
Proof:
By lemma 5.5, we have
.
In this section you will get to know a very important tool in mathematics, namely partitions of unity. We will use it in this chapter and also later in the book. In order to prove the existence of partitions of unity (we will soon define what this is), we need a few definitions first.
We also need definition 3.13 in the proof, which is why we restate it now:
Definition 3.13:
For
, we define
.
Proof: We will prove this by explicitly constructing such a sequence of functions.
1. First, we construct a sequence of open balls
with the properties


.
In order to do this, we first start with the definition of a sequence compact sets; for each
, we define
.
This sequence has the properties

.
We now construct
such that
and

for some
. We do this in the following way: To meet the first condition, we first cover
with balls by choosing for every
a ball
such that
for an
. Since these balls cover
, and
is compact, we may choose a finite subcover
.
To meet the second condition, we proceed analogously, noting that for all
is compact and
is open.
This sequence of open balls has the properties which we wished for.
2. We choose the respective functions. Since each
,
is an open ball, it has the form

where
and
.
It is easy to prove that the function defined by

satisfies
if and only if
. Hence, also
. We define

and, for each
,
.
Then, since
is never zero, the sequence
is a sequence of
functions and further, it has the properties 1. - 4., as can be easily checked.
Definition 5.9:
Let

be a linear partial differential equation. A function
such that for all
is well-defined and

is a fundamental solution of that partial differential equation is called a Green's function of that partial differential equation.
Definition 5.10:
Let

be a linear partial differential equation. A function
such that the function

is a Greens function for that partial differential equation is called a Green's kernel of that partial differential equation.
Theorem 5.11:
Let

be a linear partial differential equation (in the following, we will sometimes abbreviate PDE for partial differential equation) such that
, and let
be a Green's kernel for that PDE. If

exists and
exists and is continuous, then
solves the partial differential equation.
Proof:
We choose
to be a partition of unity of
, where the open cover of
shall consist only of the set
. Then by definition of partitions of unity
.
For each
, we define

and
.
By Fubini's theorem, for all
and
.
Hence,
as given in theorem 4.11 is a well-defined distribution.
Theorem 5.4 implies that
is a distributional solution to the PDE
.
Thus, for all
we have, using theorem 4.19,
.
Since
and
are both continuous, they must be equal due to theorem 3.17. Summing both sides of the equation over
yields the theorem.
Proof:
If
, then

for sufficiently large
, where the maximum in the last expression converges to
as
, since the support of
is compact and therefore
is uniformly continuous by the Heine–Cantor theorem.
The last theorem shows that if we have found a locally integrable function
such that
,
we have found a Green's kernel
for the respective PDEs. We will rely on this theorem in our procedure to get solutions to the heat equation and Poisson's equation.