This chapter is about the heat equation, which looks like this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8941/b894111b3268e1da9a86d483c1df54f9f944d491" alt="{\displaystyle \forall (t,x)\in \mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R} ^{d}:\partial _{t}u(t,x)-\Delta _{x}u(t,x)=f(t,x)}"
for some
. Using distribution theory, we will prove an explicit solution formula (if
is often enough differentiable), and we even prove a solution formula for the initial value problem.
Lemma 6.1:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1caca/1cacac8c9df3569f74319e451bf1990632e20a9f" alt="{\displaystyle \int _{\mathbb {R} }e^{-x^{2}}dx={\sqrt {\pi }}}"
Proof:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb866/bb866e85b0f48681bdd186eeca9c10d1d93a917e" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\left(\int _{\mathbb {R} }e^{-x^{2}}\right)^{2}&=\left(\int _{\mathbb {R} }e^{-x^{2}}\right)\cdot \left(\int _{\mathbb {R} }e^{-y^{2}}\right)&\\&=\int _{\mathbb {R} }\int _{\mathbb {R} }e^{-(x^{2}+y^{2})}dxdy&\\&=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{2}}e^{-\|(x,y)\|^{2}}d(x,y)&{\text{Fubini}}\\&=\int _{0}^{\infty }\int _{0}^{2\pi }re^{-r^{2}}d\varphi dr&{\text{ integration by substitution using spherical coordinates}}\\&=2\pi \int _{0}^{\infty }re^{-r^{2}}dr&\\&=2\pi \int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{2{\sqrt {r}}}}{\sqrt {r}}e^{-r}dr&{\text{integration by substitution using }}r\mapsto {\sqrt {r}}\\&=\pi &\end{aligned}}}"
Taking the square root on both sides finishes the proof.
Lemma 6.2:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e00a5/e00a588b73a6c37d1dac465f0297b50bb3abb50d" alt="{\displaystyle \int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}e^{-\|x\|^{2}/2}dx={\sqrt {2\pi }}^{d}}"
Proof:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad695/ad695c3f0bb5ef082dd8d7c5bfbb3d3f033a8a29" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}e^{-{\frac {\|x\|^{2}}{2}}}dx&=\overbrace {\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\cdots \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }} ^{d{\text{ times}}}e^{-{\frac {x_{1}^{2}+\cdots +x_{d}^{2}}{2}}}dx_{1}\cdots dx_{d}&{\text{Fubini's theorem}}\\&=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }e^{-{\frac {x_{d}^{2}}{2}}}\cdots \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }e^{-{\frac {x_{1}^{2}}{2}}}dx_{1}\,\cdots dx_{d}&{\text{pulling the constants out of the integrals}}\end{aligned}}}"
By lemma 6.1,
.
If we apply to this integration by substitution (theorem 5.5) with the diffeomorphism
, we obtain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/574be/574bef252236bb42967230c1f3574ce0f4a4a3b9" alt="{\displaystyle {\sqrt {\pi }}=\int _{\mathbb {R} }{\frac {1}{\sqrt {2}}}e^{-{\frac {x^{2}}{2}}}dx}"
and multiplying with
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f36dc/f36dcb4f2dd0631720e2ec27dc20557cab782181" alt="{\displaystyle {\sqrt {2\pi }}=\int _{\mathbb {R} }e^{-{\frac {x^{2}}{2}}}dx}"
Therefore, calculating the innermost integrals first and then pulling out the resulting constants,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61735/61735230a3d58aea38784fd8f734261183034b50" alt="{\displaystyle \overbrace {\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }e^{-{\frac {x_{d}^{2}}{2}}}\cdots \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }e^{-{\frac {x_{1}^{2}}{2}}}} ^{d{\text{ times}}}dx_{1}\cdots dx_{d}={\sqrt {2\pi }}^{d}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/141be/141be0114e59beaa670b6a3b7cf9a627d9317d31" alt="{\displaystyle \Box }"
Theorem 6.3:
The function
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be728/be7286cddbb033a22cd4abfea2cb9cce3bf24d99" alt="{\displaystyle E:\mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R} ^{d}\to \mathbb {R} ,E(t,x)={\begin{cases}{\sqrt {4\pi t}}^{-d}e^{-{\frac {\|x\|^{2}}{4t}}}&t>0\\0&t\leq 0\end{cases}}}"
is a Green's kernel for the heat equation.
Proof:
1.
We show that
is locally integrable.
Let
a compact set, and let
such that
. We first show that the integral
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a64fb/a64fb7033601cf229fac0d9ceef03b64d76ddf1d" alt="{\displaystyle \int _{(-T,T)\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(s,y)d(s,y)}"
exists:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53485/534853096a7b448eea854309680da82fdba00d75" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\int _{(-T,T)\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(s,y)d(s,y)&=\int _{(0,T)\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(s,y)d(s,y)&\forall s\leq 0:E(s,y)=0\\&=\int _{0}^{T}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}{\frac {1}{{\sqrt {4\pi s}}^{d}}}e^{-{\frac {\|y\|^{2}}{4s}}}dyds&{\text{Fubini's theorem}}\end{aligned}}}"
By transformation of variables in the inner integral using the diffeomorphism
, and lemma 6.2, we obtain:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52119/52119eb6837563d9c9ca4b222e3f1df0bf2798d7" alt="{\displaystyle =\int _{0}^{T}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}{\frac {{\sqrt {2s}}^{d}}{{\sqrt {4\pi s}}^{d}}}e^{-{\frac {\|y\|^{2}}{2}}}dyds=\int _{0}^{T}1ds=T}"
Therefore the integral
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a64fb/a64fb7033601cf229fac0d9ceef03b64d76ddf1d" alt="{\displaystyle \int _{(-T,T)\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(s,y)d(s,y)}"
exists. But since
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b631/2b631571a91d9b90e1696c6209a7e6d851806e28" alt="{\displaystyle \forall (s,y)\in \mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R} ^{d}:|\chi _{K}(s,y)E(s,y)|\leq |E(s,y)|}"
, where
is the characteristic function of
, the integral
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a88fe/a88fe0eecefd1e15a0d1b17a4fe643b137589b56" alt="{\displaystyle \int _{(-T,T)\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}}\chi _{K}(s,y)E(s,y)d(s,y)=\int _{K}E(s,y)d(s,y)}"
exists. Since
was an arbitrary compact set, we thus have local integrability.
2.
We calculate
and
(see exercise 1).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b5d6/8b5d66acf24c0b21c868c12ac92b8287fd0d1338" alt="{\displaystyle \partial _{t}E(t,x)=\left({\frac {\|x\|^{2}}{4t^{2}}}-{\frac {d}{4t}}\right)E(t,x)}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/126ba/126ba34f81e5a68c0a37b7f6450a79aa9a3eeecc" alt="{\displaystyle \Delta _{x}E(t,x)=\left({\frac {\|x\|^{2}}{4t^{2}}}-{\frac {d}{4t}}\right)E(t,x)}"
3.
We show that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8915/f8915483614c535e6604a1eefff1fcec7a4a94af" alt="{\displaystyle \forall \varphi \in {\mathcal {D}}(\mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R} ^{d}),(t,x)\in \mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R} ^{d}:(\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})T_{E(\cdot -(t,x))}(\varphi )=\delta _{(t,x)}(\varphi )}"
Let
be arbitrary.
In this last step of the proof, we will only manipulate the term
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f7fb/4f7fb56cc13696e0a7364679528f812f7c5450bb" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}(\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})T_{E(\cdot -(t,x))}(\varphi )&=T_{E(\cdot -(t,x))}((-\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})\varphi )&{\text{by definition of distribution derivation}}\\&=\int _{\mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R} ^{d}}(-\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)d(s,y)&\\&=\int _{(t,\infty )\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}}(-\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)d(s,y)&\forall t\leq 0:E(t,x)=0\\\end{aligned}}}"
If we choose
and
such that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13022/13022fe45bb889d3ab738b27bc7d77263ca9249b" alt="{\displaystyle {\text{supp }}\varphi \subset (-\infty ,t+T)\times B_{R}(x)}"
, we have even
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66857/668570bf44c34561dbbcd75a90ede13420fe78f4" alt="{\displaystyle (\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})T_{E(\cdot -(t,x))}(\varphi )=\int _{(t,t+T)\times B_{R}(x)}(-\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)d(s,y)}"
Using the dominated convergence theorem (theorem 5.1), we can rewrite the term again:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}(\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})T_{E(\cdot -(t,x))}(\varphi )&=\int _{(t,t+T)\times B_{R}(x)}(-\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)d(s,y)\\&=\lim _{\epsilon \downarrow 0}\int _{(t,t+T)\times B_{R}(x)}(-\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)(1-\chi _{[t,t+\epsilon ]}(s))d(s,y)\\&=\lim _{\epsilon \downarrow 0}\int _{(t+\epsilon ,t+T)\times B_{R}(x)}(-\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)d(s,y)\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/e913301ee6126b390a02d6c41e7ad31a5f5c6014)
, where
is the characteristic function of
.
We split the limit term in half to manipulate each summand separately:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12c75/12c7573cbb478e69658503bd060b6cf218bd4f77" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\int _{(t+\epsilon ,t+T)\times B_{R}(x)}(-\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)d(s,y)\\=-\int _{(t+\epsilon ,t+T)\times B_{R}(x)}\Delta _{x}\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)d(s,y)\\-\int _{(t+\epsilon ,t+T)\times B_{R}(x)}\partial _{t}\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)d(s,y)\\\end{aligned}}}"
The last integrals are taken over
for
. In this area and its boundary,
is differentiable. Therefore, we are allowed to integrate by parts.
In the last two manipulations, we used integration by parts where
and
exchanged the role of the function in theorem 5.4, and
and
exchanged the role of the vector field. In the latter manipulation, we did not apply theorem 5.4 directly, but instead with subtracted boundary term on both sides.
Let's also integrate the other integral by parts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51da0/51da0d4b8a29bd31d3c167ba758ceedf32b1b3ae" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\int _{(t+\epsilon ,t+T)\times B_{R}(x)}\partial _{t}\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)d(s,y)&=\int _{B_{R}(x)}\int _{t+\epsilon }^{t+T}\partial _{t}\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x)dsdy&{\text{Fubini}}\\=\int _{B_{R}(x)}\underbrace {\varphi (s,y)E(s-t,y-x){\big |}_{s=t+\epsilon }^{s=t+T}} _{=-\varphi (t+\epsilon ,y)E(\epsilon ,y-x)}dy&-\int _{B_{R}(x)}\int _{t+\epsilon }^{t+T}\varphi (s,y)\partial _{t}E(s-t,y-x)dsdy&{\text{integration by parts in }}s\end{aligned}}}"
Now we add the two terms back together and see that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c55d0/c55d0f7e02e41f4e7acef788aebdcb7bac091e10" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}(\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})T_{E(\cdot -(t,x))}(\varphi )&=\lim _{\epsilon \downarrow 0}-\int _{B_{R}(x)}-\varphi (t+\epsilon ,y)E(\epsilon ,y-x)dy\\+\int _{B_{R}(x)}\int _{t+\epsilon }^{t+T}\varphi (s,y)\partial _{t}E(s-t,y-x)dsdy&-\int _{t+\epsilon }^{t+T}\int _{B_{R}(x)}\varphi (s,y)\Delta _{x}E(s-t,y-x)dyds\end{aligned}}}"
The derivative calculations from above show that
, which is why the last two integrals cancel and therefore
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d2d3/5d2d31d1850f081afd08eaa78d2a0bb322e3a173" alt="{\displaystyle (\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})T_{E(\cdot -(t,x))}(\varphi )=\lim _{\epsilon \downarrow 0}\int _{B_{R}(x)}\varphi (t+\epsilon ,y)E(\epsilon ,y-x)dy}"
Using that
and with multi-dimensional integration by substitution with the diffeomorphism
we obtain:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abdc9/abdc98d7d7f0b0f12906863501e694aa5083e280" alt="{\displaystyle =\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}\varphi (t+\epsilon ,x+{\sqrt {2\epsilon }}y){\frac {{\sqrt {2\epsilon }}^{d}}{{\sqrt {4\pi \epsilon }}^{d}}}e^{-{\frac {\|y\|^{2}}{2}}}dy={\frac {1}{{\sqrt {2\pi }}^{d}}}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}\varphi (t+\epsilon ,x+{\sqrt {2\epsilon }}y)e^{-{\frac {\|y\|^{2}}{2}}}dy}"
Since
is continuous (even smooth), we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81462/81462ea319e6a7ec1ef81f64b2d417e94664a54a" alt="{\displaystyle \forall x\in \mathbb {R} ^{d}:\lim _{\epsilon \to 0}\varphi (t+\epsilon ,x+{\sqrt {2\epsilon }}y)=\varphi (t,x)}"
Therefore
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3503/a3503fecc9ff36e2d4b9d648875220eb023cffcd" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}(\partial _{t}-\Delta _{x})T_{E(\cdot -(t,x))}(\varphi )&=\lim _{\epsilon \downarrow 0}{\frac {1}{{\sqrt {2\pi }}^{d}}}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}\varphi (t+\epsilon ,x+{\sqrt {2\epsilon }}y)e^{-{\frac {\|y\|^{2}}{2}}}dy&\\&={\frac {1}{{\sqrt {2\pi }}^{d}}}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}\varphi (t,x)e^{-{\frac {\|y\|^{2}}{2}}}dy&{\text{dominated convergence}}\\&=\varphi (t,x)&{\text{lemma 6.2}}\\&=\delta _{(t,x)}(\varphi )&\end{aligned}}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/141be/141be0114e59beaa670b6a3b7cf9a627d9317d31" alt="{\displaystyle \Box }"
Theorem 6.4:
If
is bounded, once continuously differentiable in the
-variable and twice continuously differentiable in the
-variable, then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/948fd/948fd3bf1f09a750e8d90f45b14bd268c73b27c9" alt="{\displaystyle u(t,x):=(E*f)(t,x)}"
solves the heat equation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8941/b894111b3268e1da9a86d483c1df54f9f944d491" alt="{\displaystyle \forall (t,x)\in \mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R} ^{d}:\partial _{t}u(t,x)-\Delta _{x}u(t,x)=f(t,x)}"
Proof:
1.
We show that
is sufficiently often differentiable such that the equations are satisfied.
2.
We invoke theorem 5.?, which states exactly that a convolution with a Green's kernel is a solution, provided that the convolution is sufficiently often differentiable (which we showed in part 1 of the proof).
Theorem and definition 6.6:
Let
be bounded, once continuously differentiable in the
-variable and twice continuously differentiable in the
-variable, and let
be continuous and bounded. If we define
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1629/d1629cd076646b22d4c9bb03e45caac53514fdd0" alt="{\displaystyle {\tilde {f}}:\mathbb {R} \times \mathbb {R} ^{d}\to \mathbb {R} ,{\tilde {f}}(t,x)={\begin{cases}f(t,x)&t\geq 0\\0&t<0\end{cases}}}"
, then the function
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0954/c095453748d8f570d18c350e28fadd58b034fdf1" alt="{\displaystyle u:[0,\infty )\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}\to \mathbb {R} ,u(t,x)={\begin{cases}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)+({\tilde {f}}*E)(t,x)&t>0\\g(x)&t=0\end{cases}}}"
is a continuous solution of the initial value problem for the heat equation, that is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b40a8/b40a80a6f4801b5ad255590be47234b698ae3081" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{cases}\forall (t,x)\in (0,\infty )\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}:&\partial _{t}u(t,x)-\Delta _{x}u(t,x)=f(t,x)\\\forall x\in \mathbb {R} ^{d}:&u(0,x)=g(x)\end{cases}}}"
Note that if we do not require the solution to be continuous, we may just take any solution and just set it to
at
.
Proof:
1.
We show
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dfab/8dfaba65217748490038c362b2d2c28ee0afcd22" alt="{\displaystyle \forall (t,x)\in (0,\infty )\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}:\partial _{t}u(t,x)-\Delta _{x}u(t,x)=f(t,x)~~~~~(*)}"
From theorem 7.4, we already know that
solves
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bb8b/8bb8b291481e75ff8c39de40c2c24b2079733291" alt="{\displaystyle \forall (t,x)\in (0,\infty )\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}:\partial _{t}({\tilde {f}}*E)(t,x)-\Delta _{x}({\tilde {f}}*E)(t,x)={\tilde {f}}(t,x){\overset {t>0}{=}}f(t,x)}"
Therefore, we have for
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d61e9/d61e93e05d1cae2b86a0fb9df40ed7f4f7282b00" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\partial _{t}u(t,x)-\Delta _{x}u(t,x)=&\partial _{t}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)+\partial _{t}({\tilde {f}}*E)(t,x)\\&-\Delta _{x}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)-\Delta _{x}({\tilde {f}}*E)(t,x)\\=&f(t,x)+\partial _{t}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)-\Delta _{x}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)\end{aligned}}}"
which is why
would follow if
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46753/46753efd56ffbed32a346f8126d36539fbe90ff0" alt="{\displaystyle \forall (t,x)\in (0,\infty )\times \mathbb {R} ^{d}:\partial _{t}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)-\Delta _{x}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)=0}"
This we shall now check.
By definition of the spatial convolution, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dff6/0dff645b84aeb9452f44f45e4208196493f589a2" alt="{\displaystyle \partial _{t}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)=\partial _{t}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(t,x-y)g(y)dy}"
and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d0ab/2d0aba965753c2ce358a2956eadee1bf07f7dc83" alt="{\displaystyle \Delta _{x}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)=\Delta _{x}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(t,x-y)g(y)dy}"
By applying Leibniz' integral rule (see exercise 2) we find that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe1b8/fe1b863ef91856240c16fbfe5941bd1f8547155c" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\partial _{t}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)-\Delta _{x}(E*_{x}g)(t,x)&=\partial _{t}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(t,x-y)g(y)dy-\Delta _{x}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(t,x-y)g(y)dy&\\&=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}\partial _{t}E(t,x-y)g(y)dy-\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}\Delta _{x}E(t,x-y)g(y)dy&{\text{ Leibniz' integral rule}}\\&=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}\left(\partial _{t}E(t,x-y)-\Delta _{x}E(t,x-y)\right)g(y)dy&{\text{ linearity of the integral}}\\&=0&{\text{ exercise 1}}\end{aligned}}}"
for all
.
2.
We show that
is continuous.
It is clear that
is continuous on
, since all the first-order partial derivatives exist and are continuous (see exercise 2). It remains to be shown that
is continuous on
.
To do so, we first note that for all
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16b7d/16b7d1e00efd5efe6654cc84c5d24af1334497cf" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(t,x-y)dy&=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(t,y)dy&{\text{ integration by substitution using }}y\mapsto x-y\\&=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}{\sqrt {4\pi t}}^{-d}e^{\frac {\|y\|^{2}}{4t}}dy&\\&=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}{\sqrt {2\pi }}^{-d}e^{\frac {\|y\|^{2}}{2}}dy&{\text{ integration by substitution using }}y\mapsto {\sqrt {2t}}y\\&=1&{\text{ lemma 6.2}}\end{aligned}}}"
Furthermore, due to the continuity of
, we may choose for arbitrary
and any
a
such that
.
From these last two observations, we may conclude:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60117/601170b105a0fdcf684a4625cc9c57b19baa16a3" alt="{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}|g(x)-(E*_{x}g)(t,x)|&=\left|1\cdot g(x)-\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(t,x-y)g(x)dy\right|&\\&=\left|\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(t,x-y)g(x)dy-\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}E(t,x-y)g(x)dy\right|\\&=\left|\int _{B_{\delta }(x)}E(t,x-y)(g(y)-g(x))dy+\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}\setminus B_{\delta }(x)}E(t,x-y)(g(y)-g(x))dy\right|&\\&\leq \left|\int _{B_{\delta }(x)}E(t,x-y)(g(y)-g(x))dy\right|+\left|\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}\setminus B_{\delta }(x)}E(t,x-y)(g(y)-g(x))dy\right|&{\text{triangle ineq. in }}\mathbb {R} \\&\leq \int _{B_{\delta }(x)}|E(t,x-y)|\underbrace {|g(y)-g(x)|} _{<\epsilon }dy+\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}\setminus B_{\delta }(x)}|E(t,x-y)(g(y)-g(x))|dy&{\text{ triangle ineq. for }}\int \\&<\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}}|E(t,x-y)|\epsilon dy+\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}\setminus B_{\delta }(x)}|E(t,x-y)|\underbrace {(|g(y)|+|g(x)|)} _{\leq 2\|g\|_{\infty }}dy&{\text{ monotony of the }}\int \\&=\epsilon +2\|g\|_{\infty }\left|\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}\setminus B_{\delta }(x)}E(t,x-y)dy\right|\end{aligned}}}"
But due to integration by substitution using the diffeomorphism
, we obtain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a61/a3a61aec76d8036a385b77b3fe09045e67b00d1f" alt="{\displaystyle \int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}\setminus B_{\delta }(x)}E(t,x-y)dy=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}\setminus B_{\delta }(0)}E(t,x)dy=\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{d}\setminus B_{\frac {\delta }{\sqrt {2t}}}(0)}{\frac {1}{{\sqrt {2\pi }}^{d}}}e^{-{\frac {\|x\|^{2}}{2}}}dy\to 0,t\to 0}"
which is why
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1b16/d1b16f4c1c75497fb54802186ee0d8f13127653c" alt="{\displaystyle \lim _{t\to 0}|g(x)-(E*_{x}g)(t,x)|<\epsilon }"
Since
was arbitrary, continuity is proven.