Jump to content

C# Programming/Print version

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world

Introduction

[edit | edit source]

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a multi-purpose computer programming language suitable for all development needs.

Introduction

[edit | edit source]

Although C# is derived from the C programming language, it has features such as garbage collection that allow beginners to become proficient in C# more quickly than in C or C++. Similar to Java, it is object-oriented, comes with an extensive class library, and supports exception handling, multiple types of polymorphism, and separation of interfaces from implementations. Those features, combined with its powerful development tools, multi-platform support, and generics, make C# a good choice for many types of software development projects: rapid application development projects, projects implemented by individuals or large or small teams, Internet applications, and projects with strict reliability requirements. Testing frameworks such as NUnit make C# amenable to test-driven development and thus a good language for use with Extreme Programming (XP). Its strong typing helps to prevent many programming errors that are common in weakly typed languages. Because of these similarities to other languages, it is possible to introduce C# as a language with features of C++ in addition to having the programming style of Java and the rapid application model of BASIC.[1]

A large part of the power of C# (as with other .NET languages), comes with the common .NET Framework API, which provides a large set of classes, including ones for encryption, TCP/IP socket programming, and graphics. Developers can thus write part of an application in C# and another part in another .NET language (e.g. VB.NET), keeping the tools, library, and object-oriented development model while only having to learn the new language syntax.

Because of the similarities between C# and the C family of languages, as well as Java, a developer with a background in object-oriented languages like C++ may find C# structure and syntax intuitive.

Standard

[edit | edit source]

Microsoft, with Anders Hejlsberg as Chief Engineer, created C# as part of their .NET initiative and subsequently opened its specification via the ECMA. Thus, the language is open to implementation by other parties. Other implementations include Mono and DotGNU.

C# and other .NET languages rely on an implementation of the virtual machine specified in the Common Language Infrastructure, like Microsoft's Common Language Runtime (CLR). CLR, for example, manages memory, handles object references, and performs Just-In-Time (JIT) compiling of Common Intermediate Language code. The virtual machine makes C# programs safer than those that must manage their own memory and is one of the reasons .NET language code is referred to as managed code. More like Java than C and C++, C# discourages explicit use of pointers, which could otherwise allow software bugs to corrupt system memory and force the operating system to halt the program forcibly with nondescript error messages.

History

[edit | edit source]

Microsoft's original plan was to create a rival to Java, named J++, but this was abandoned to create C#, codenamed "Cool".

Microsoft submitted C# to the ECMA standards group mid-2000.

C# 2.0 was released in late-2005 as part of Microsoft's development suite, Visual Studio 2005. The 2.0 version of C# includes such new features as generics, partial classes, and iterators.[2] [3]

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. Aisha Ikram (2003-06-17). "Quick C#". http://www.codeproject.com/: The Code Project. Retrieved 2012-04-12. C# is a language with the features of C++, programming style like Java and rapid application model of BASIC. {{cite web}}: External link in |location= (help)
  2. Allen Smithee (2005-07-15). "The Father of C# on the Past, Present and Future of Programming". http://www.microsoft-watch.com/: Microsoft Watch. Retrieved 2012-10-21. Originally code-named "Cool," C# was designed to be Microsoft's Java killer. {{cite web}}: External link in |location= (help)
  3. "C# Programming". http://www.hitmill.com/: Hitmill. 2009-05-30. Retrieved 2012-10-21. C#, a Java-like programming language, was submitted by Microsoft to the ECMA standards group in mid-2000. {{cite web}}: External link in |location= (help)

To compile your first C# application, you will need a copy of a .NET Framework SDK installed on your PC.

There are two .NET frameworks available: Microsoft's and Mono's.

Microsoft .NET

[edit | edit source]

For Windows, the .NET Framework SDK can be downloaded from Microsoft's .NET Framework Developer Center. If the default Windows directory (the directory where Windows or WinNT is installed) is C:\WINDOWS, the .Net Framework SDK installation places the Visual C# .NET compiler (csc) in the

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.0.3705 directory for version 1.0, the

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322 directory for version 1.1, the

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727 directory for version 2.0, the

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.0 directory for version 3.0, the

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5 directory for version 3.5, or the

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319 directory for version 4.0.

For Windows, Linux, or other Operating Systems, an installer can be downloaded from the Mono website. The Mono C# compiler is called mcs.

Linux

[edit | edit source]

In Linux you can use the MonoDevelop IDE, and either download from their website at: MonoDevelop Downloads, or install via apt-get or your distro's installer.

  • Debian-based distros:
sudo apt-get install monodevelop
  • Arch Linux:
sudo pacman -S mono monodevelop

Windows

[edit | edit source]

You can download MonoDevelop from their website at: Mono website. Click the Windows icon, and follow the installation instructions.

If you are working on Windows it is a good idea to add the path to the folders that contain cs.exe or mcs.exe to the Path environment variable so that you do not need to type the full path each time you want to compile.

For writing C#.NET code, there are plenty of editors that are available. It's entirely possible to write C#.NET programs with a simple text editor, but it should be noted that this requires you to compile the code yourself. Microsoft offers a wide range of code editing programs under the Visual Studio line that offer syntax highlighting as well as compiling and debugging capabilities. Currently C#.NET can be compiled in Visual Studio 2002 and 2003 (only supports the .NET Framework version 1.0 and 1.1) and Visual Studio 2005 (supports the .NET Framework 2.0 and earlier versions with some tweaking). Microsoft offers five Visual Studio editions, four of which are sold commercially. The Visual Studio C# Express Edition can be downloaded and used for free from Microsoft's website.

Hello, World!

[edit | edit source]

The code below will demonstrate a C# program written in a simple text editor. Start by saving the following code to a text file called hello.cs:

using System;

namespace MyConsoleApplication
{
	class MyFirstClass
	{
		static void Main(string[] args)
		{
         //No need to use "System" but you can use it if you want but you already have "using System;" 
			System.Console.WriteLine("Hello,");
			Console.WriteLine("World!");
			Console.ReadLine();
		}
	}
}

To compile hello.cs, run the following from the command line:

  • For standard Microsoft installations of .NET 2.0,first cd into the directory with your source file then run C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\csc.exe hello.cs
  • For Mono run mcs hello.cs.
  • For users of cscc, compile with cscc hello.cs -o hello.exe.

Doing so will produce hello.exe. The following command will run hello.exe:

  • On Windows, use hello.exe.
  • On Linux, use mono hello.exe or ilrun hello.exe.

Alternatively, in Visual C# express, you could just hit F5 or the green play button to run the code. If you want to run without debugging, press CTRL-F5.

Running hello.exe will produce the following output:

Hello,
World!

The program will then wait for you to strike 'enter' before returning to the command prompt.

Note that the example above includes the System namespace via the using keyword. That inclusion allows direct references to any member of the System namespace without specifying its fully qualified name.

The first call to the WriteLine method of the Console class uses a fully qualified reference.

System.Console.WriteLine("Hello,");

The second call to that method shortens the reference to the Console class by taking advantage of the fact that the System namespace is included (with using System).

Console.WriteLine("World!");

C# is a fully object-oriented language. The following sections explain the syntax of the C# language as a beginner's course for programming in the language. Note that much of the power of the language comes from the classes provided with the .NET framework, which are not part of the C# language syntax per se.

Language Basics

[edit | edit source]

This section will define the naming conventions that are generally accepted by the C# development community. Some companies may define naming conventions that differ from this, but that is done on an individual basis and is generally discouraged. Some of the objects discussed in this section may be beyond the reader's knowledge at this point, but this section can be referred back to later.

Reasoning

[edit | edit source]

Much of the naming standards are derived from Microsoft's .NET Framework libraries. These standards have proven to make names readable and understandable "at a glance". By using the correct conventions when naming objects, you ensure that other C# programmers who read your code will easily understand what objects are without having to search your code for their definition.

Conventions

[edit | edit source]

Namespace

[edit | edit source]

Namespaces are named using Pascal Case (also called UpperCamelCase) with no underscores. This means the first letter of every word in the name is capitalized. For example: MyNewNamespace. Pascal Case also means that acronyms of three or more letters should only have the first letter capitalized (MyXmlNamespace instead of MyXMLNamespace).

Assemblies

[edit | edit source]

If an assembly contains only one namespace, the assembly and the namespace should use the same name. Otherwise, assemblies should follow the normal Pascal Case format.

Classes and Structures

[edit | edit source]

Pascal Case, no underscores or leading C, cls, or I. Classes should not have the same name as the namespace in which they reside. Any acronyms of three or more letters should be Pascal Case, not all caps. Try to avoid abbreviations, and try to always use nouns.

Exception Classes

[edit | edit source]

Follow class naming conventions, but add Exception to the end of the name. In .Net 2.0, all classes should inherit from the System.Exception base class, and not inherit from the System.ApplicationException.

Interfaces

[edit | edit source]

Follow class naming conventions, but start the name with I and capitalize the letter following the I. Example: IFoo The I prefix helps to differentiate between Interfaces and classes and also to avoid name collisions.

Functions

[edit | edit source]

Pascal Case, no underscores except in the event handlers. Try to avoid abbreviations. Many programmers have a nasty habit of overly abbreviating everything. This should be discouraged.

Properties and Public Member Variables

[edit | edit source]

Pascal Case, no underscores. Try to avoid abbreviations.

Parameters and Procedure-level Variables

[edit | edit source]

Camel Case (or lowerCamelCase). Try to avoid abbreviations. Camel Case is the same as Pascal case, but the first letter of the first word is lowercased.

Class-level Private and Protected Variables

[edit | edit source]

Camel Case with a leading underscore. Always indicate protected or private in the declaration. The leading underscore is the only controversial thing in this document. The leading character helps to prevent name collisions in constructors (a parameter and a private variable having the same name).

Controls on Forms

[edit | edit source]

Pascal Case with a prefix that identifies it as being part of the UI instead of a purely coded control (example a temporary variable). Many developers use ui as the prefix followed by a descriptive name such as txtUserName or lblUserNickName ("txt" stands for TextBox control and "lbl" for Label control)

This is in effect Camel Case; furthermore, this naming convention is known as Hungarian naming convention and is typically discouraged in modern programming. Variables in this style have names like lblSurname or tbSurname, rather than surnameLabel or surnameTextBox. This has the added advantage that similar UI elements are listed alphabetically contiguously in IntelliSense.

Some samples are below for ASP.Net web form controls:

Control Prefix Example
Label lbl lblSurname
TextBox(ASP.Net) tb tbSurname
TextBox(WinForms) txt txtUserName
DataGrid dg dgResults
GridView gv gvResults2
Button btn btnSave
ImageButton iBtn iBtnSave
Hyperlink lnk lnkHomePage
ComboBox cmb cmbYear
DropDownList ddl ddlCompany
ListBox lst lstCompany
DataList dLst dLstAddress
DataSet ds dsInvoices
DataTable dt dtClients
DataRow dr drUser
Repeater rep repSection
Checkbox chk chkMailList
CheckBoxList chk chkAddress
RadioButton rBtn rBtnGender
RadioButtonList rBtn rBtnAgeGroup
Image img imgLogo
Panel pnl pnlSevtion
PlaceHolder plh plhHeader
Calendar cal calMyDate
AdRotator adr adrBanner
Table tbl tblResults
[All] Validators val (N/A) valCreditCardNumber
ValidationSummary vals (N/A) valsErrors

Constants

[edit | edit source]

Pascal Case. The use of SCREAMING_CAPS is discouraged. This is a large change from earlier conventions. Most developers now realize that in using SCREAMING_CAPS they betray more implementation than is necessary. A large portion of the .NET Framework Design Guidelines is dedicated to this discussion.

Example

[edit | edit source]

Here is an example of a class that uses all of these naming conventions combined.

using System;

namespace MyExampleNamespace
{
    public class Customer : IDisposable
    {
        private string _customerName;
        public string CustomerName 
        { 
            get 
            { 
                return _customerName; 
            }
            set
            {
                _customerName = value;
                _lastUpdated = DateTime.Now;
            }
        }

        private DateTime _lastUpdated;

        public DateTime LastUpdated
        {
            get
            {
                return _lastUpdated;
            }
            private set
            {
                _lastUpdated = value;
            }
        }

        public void UpdateCustomer(string newName)
        {
            if (!newName.Equals(CustomerName))
            {
                CustomerName = newName;
            }
        }

        public void Dispose()
        {
            //Do nothing
        }
    }
}


C# syntax looks quite similar to the syntax of Java because both inherit much of their syntax from C and C++. The object-oriented nature of C# requires the high-level structure of a C# program to be defined in terms of classes, whose detailed behaviors are defined by their statements.

Statements

[edit | edit source]

The basic unit of execution in a C# program is the statement. A statement can declare a variable, define an expression, perform a simple action by calling a method, control the flow of execution of other statements, create an object, or assign a value to a variable, property, or field. Statements are usually terminated by a semicolon.

Statements can follow in sequence or be grouped in brace-enclosed statement blocks.

Examples:

int sampleVariable;                           // declaring a variable
sampleVariable = 5;                           // assigning a value
Method();                                     // calling an instance method
SampleClass sampleObject = new SampleClass(); // creating a new instance of a class
sampleObject.ObjectMethod();                  // calling a member function of an object

// executing a "for" loop with an embedded "if" statement 
for (int i = 0; i < upperLimit; i++)
{
    if (SampleClass.SampleStaticMethodReturningBoolean(i))
    {
        sum += sampleObject.SampleMethodReturningInteger(i);
    }
}

Statement blocks

[edit | edit source]

A series of statements surrounded by curly braces form a block of code. Among other purposes, code blocks serve to limit scope, or the range in which a variable can be used. A variable is only accessible in the block in which it is defined. Code blocks can be nested and often appear as the bodies of methods.

private void MyMethod(int integerValue)
{  // This block of code is the body of "MyMethod()"

   // The 'integerValue' integer parameter is accessible to everything in the method

   int methodLevelVariable; // This variable is accessible to everything in the method

   if (integerValue == 2)
   {
      // methodLevelVariable is still accessible here     
  
      int limitedVariable; // This variable is only accessible to code in the, if block

      DoSomeWork(limitedVariable);
   }
   
   // limitedVariable is no longer accessible here
    
}  // Here ends the code block for the body of "MyMethod()".

Comments

[edit | edit source]

Comments allow inline documentation of source code. The C# compiler ignores comments. These styles of comments are allowed in C#:

Single-line comments
The // character sequence marks the following text as a single-line comment. Single-line comments, as one would expect, end at the first end-of-line following the // comment marker.
Multiple-line comments
Comments can span multiple lines by using the multiple-line comment style. Such comments start with /* and end with */. The text between those multi-line comment markers is the comment.
// This style of a comment is restricted to one line.
/* 
   This is another style of a comment.
   It allows multiple lines.
*/
XML Documentation-line comments
These comments are used to generate XML documentation. Single-line and multiple-line styles can be used. The single-line style, where each line of the comment begins with ///, is more common than the multiple-line style delimited by /** and */.
/// <summary> documentation here </summary>
/// <remarks>
///     This uses single-line style XML Documentation comments.
/// </remarks>


/** 
 * <summary> documentation here </summary>
 * <remarks>
 *     This uses multiple-line style XML Documentation comments.
 * </remarks>
 */

Case sensitivity

[edit | edit source]

C# is case-sensitive, including its variable and method names.

The variables myInteger and MyInteger of type int below are distinct because C# is case-sensitive:

 int myInteger = 3;
 int MyInteger = 5;

For example, C# defines a class Console to handle most operations with the console window. Writing the following code would result in a compiler error unless an object named console had been previously defined.

 // Compiler error!
 console.writeline("Hello");

The following corrected code compiles as expected because it uses the correct case:

 Console.WriteLine("Hello");


Variables are used to store values. More technically, a variable binds an object (in the general sense of the term, i.e. a specific value) to an identifier (the variable's name) so that the object can be accessed later. Variables can, for example, store a value for later use:

string name = "Dr. Jones";
Console.WriteLine("Good morning " + name);

In this example "name" is the identifier and "Dr. Jones" is the value that we bound to it. Also, each variable is declared with an explicit type. Only values whose types are compatible with the variable's declared type can be bound to (stored in) the variable. In the above example we stored "Dr. Jones" into a variable of the type string. This is a legal statement. However, if we had said int name = "Dr. Jones", the compiler would have thrown an error telling us that you cannot implicitly convert between int and string. There are methods for doing this, but we will talk about them later.

Fields, local variables, and parameters

[edit | edit source]

C# supports several program elements corresponding to the general programming concept of variable: fields, parameters, and local variables.

Fields

[edit | edit source]

Fields, sometimes called class-level variables, are variables associated with classes or structures. An instance variable is a field associated with an instance of the class or structure, while a static variable, declared with the static keyword, is a field associated with the type itself. Fields can also be associated with their class by making them constants (const), which requires a declaration assignment of a constant value and prevents subsequent changes to the field.

Each field has a visibility of public, protected, internal, protected internal, or private (from most visible to least visible).

Local variables

[edit | edit source]

Like fields, local variables can optionally be constant (const). Constant local variables are stored in the assembly data region, while non-constant local variables are stored on (or referenced from) the stack. They thus have both a scope and an extent of the method or statement block that declares them.

Parameter

[edit | edit source]

Parameters are variables associated with a method.

An in parameter may either have its value passed in from the caller to the method's environment, so that changes to the parameter by the method do not affect the value of the caller's variable, or passed in by reference, so that changes to the variables will affect the value of the caller's variable. Value types (int, double, string) are passed in "by value" while reference types (objects) are passed in "by reference." Since this is the default for the C# compiler, it is not necessary to use '&', as in C or C++.

An out parameter does not have its value copied, thus changes to the variable's value within the method's environment directly affect the value from the caller's environment. Such a variable is considered by the compiler to be unbound upon method entry, thus it is illegal to reference an out parameter before assigning it a value. It also must be assigned by the method in each valid (non-exceptional) code path through the method in order for the method to compile.

A reference parameter is similar to an out parameter, except that it is bound before the method call and it need not be assigned by the method.

A params parameter represents a variable number of parameters. If a method signature includes one, the params argument must be the last argument in the signature.

// Each pair of lines is what the definition of a method and a call of a 
//   method with each of the parameters types would look like.
// In param:
void MethodOne(int param1)    // definition
MethodOne(variable);          // call

// Out param:
void MethodTwo(out string message)  // definition
MethodTwo(out variable);            // call

// Reference param;
void MethodThree(ref int someFlag)  // definition
MethodThree(ref theFlag)            // call

// Params
void MethodFour(params string[] names)           // definition
MethodFour("Matthew", "Mark", "Luke", "John");   // call

Types

[edit | edit source]

Each type in C# is either a value type or a reference type. C# has several predefined ("built-in") types and allows for declaration of custom value types and reference types.

There is a fundamental difference between value types and reference types: Value types are allocated on the stack, whereas reference types are allocated on the heap.

Value types

[edit | edit source]

The value types in the .NET framework are usually small, frequently used types. The benefit of using them is that the type requires very little resources to get up and running by the CLR. Value types do not require memory to be allocated on the heap and therefore will not cause garbage collection. However, in order to be useful, the value types (or types derived from it) should remain small - ideally below 16 bytes of data. If you choose to make your value type bigger, it is recommended that you do not pass it to methods (which can require a copy of all its fields), or return it from methods.

Although this sounds like a useful type to have, it does have some flaws, which need to be understood when using it.

  • Value types are always copied (intrinsically) before being passed to a method. Changes to this new object will not be reflected back in the original object passed into the method.
  • Value types do not /need/ you to call their constructor. They are automatically initialized.
  • Value types always initialize their fields to 0 or null.
  • Value types can NEVER be assigned a value of null (but can using Nullable types)
  • Value types sometimes need to be boxed (wrapped inside an object), allowing their values to be used like objects.

Reference types

[edit | edit source]

Reference types are managed very differently by the CLR. All reference types consist of two parts: A pointer to the heap (which contains the object), and the object itself. Reference types are slightly heavier weight because of the management behind the scenes needed to keep track of them. However, this is a minor price to pay for the flexibility and speed gains from passing a pointer around, rather than copying values to/from methods.

When an object is initialized, by use of the constructor, and is of a reference type, the CLR must perform four operations:

  1. The CLR calculates the amount of memory required to hold the object on the heap.
  2. The CLR inserts the data into the newly created memory space.
  3. The CLR marks where the end of the space lies, so that the next object can be placed there.
  4. The CLR returns a reference to the newly created space.

This occurs every single time an object is created. However the assumption is that there is infinite memory, therefore some maintenance needs to take place - and that's where the garbage collector comes in.

Integral types

[edit | edit source]

Because the type system in C# is unified with other languages that are CLI-compliant, each integral C# type is actually an alias for a corresponding type in the .NET framework. Although the names of the aliases vary between .NET languages, the underlying types in the .NET framework remain the same. Thus, objects created in assemblies written in other languages of the .NET Framework can be bound to C# variables of any type to which the value can be converted, per the conversion rules below. The following illustrates the cross-language compatibility of types by comparing C# code with the equivalent Visual Basic .NET code:

// C#
public void UsingCSharpTypeAlias()
{
  int i = 42;
}

public void EquivalentCodeWithoutAlias()
{
  System.Int32 i = 42;
}
 ' Visual Basic .NET
 Public Sub UsingVisualBasicTypeAlias()
   Dim i As Integer = 42
 End Sub

 Public Sub EquivalentCodeWithoutAlias()
   Dim i As System.Int32 = 42
 End Sub

Using the language-specific type aliases is often considered more readable than using the fully-qualified .NET Framework type names.

The fact that each C# type corresponds to a type in the unified type system gives each value type a consistent size across platforms and compilers. That consistency is an important distinction from other languages such as C, where, e.g. a long is only guaranteed to be at least as large as an int, and is implemented with different sizes by different compilers. As reference types, variables of types derived from object (i.e. any class) are exempt from the consistent size requirement. That is, the size of reference types like System.IntPtr, as opposed to value types like System.Int32, may vary by platform. Fortunately, there is rarely a need to know the actual size of a reference type.

There are two predefined reference types: object, an alias for the System.Object class, from which all other reference types derive; and string, an alias for the System.String class. C# likewise has several integral value types, each an alias to a corresponding value type in the System namespace of the .NET Framework. The predefined C# type aliases expose the methods of the underlying .NET Framework types. For example, since the .NET Framework's System.Int32 type implements a ToString() method to convert the value of an integer to its string representation, C#'s int type exposes that method:

int i = 97;
string s = i.ToString();  // The value of s is now the string "97".

Likewise, the System.Int32 type implements the Parse() method, which can therefore be accessed via C#'s int type:

string s = "97";
int i = int.Parse(s); // The value of i is now the integer 97.

The unified type system is enhanced by the ability to convert value types to reference types (boxing) and likewise to convert certain reference types to their corresponding value types (unboxing). This is also known as casting.

object boxedInteger = 97;
int unboxedInteger = (int) boxedInteger;

Boxing and casting are, however, not type-safe: the compiler won't generate an error if the programmer mixes up the types. In the following short example the mistake is quite obvious, but in complex programs it may be very difficult to spot. Avoid boxing, if possible.

object getInteger = "97";
int anInteger = (int) getInteger; // No compile-time error. The program will crash, however.

The built-in C# type aliases and their equivalent .NET Framework types follow:

Integers

[edit | edit source]
C# Alias .NET Type Size (bits) Range
sbyte System.SByte 8 -128 to 127
byte System.Byte 8 0 to 255
short System.Int16 16 -32,768 to 32,767
ushort System.UInt16 16 0 to 65,535
char System.Char 16 A unicode character of code 0 to 65,535
int System.Int32 32 -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647
uint System.UInt32 32 0 to 4,294,967,295
long System.Int64 64 -9,223,372,036,854,775,808 to 9,223,372,036,854,775,807
ulong System.UInt64 64 0 to 18,446,744,073,709,551,615

Floating-point

[edit | edit source]
C# Alias .NET Type Size (bits) Precision Range
float System.Single 32 7 digits 1.5 x 10-45 to 3.4 x 1038
double System.Double 64 15-16 digits 5.0 x 10-324 to 1.7 x 10308
decimal System.Decimal 128 28-29 decimal places 1.0 x 10-28 to 7.9 x 1028

Other predefined types

[edit | edit source]
C# Alias .NET Type Size (bits) Range
bool System.Boolean 32 true or false, which aren't related to any integer in C#.
object System.Object 32/64 Platform dependent (a pointer to an object).
string System.String 16*length A unicode string with no special upper bound.

Custom types

[edit | edit source]

The predefined types can be aggregated and extended into custom types.

Custom value types are declared with the struct or enum keyword. Likewise, custom reference types are declared with the class keyword.

Arrays

[edit | edit source]

Although the number of dimensions is included in array declarations, the size of each dimension is not:

string[] a_str;

Assignments to an array variable (prior to the variable's usage), however, specify the size of each dimension:

a_str = new string[5];

As with other variable types, the declaration and the initialization can be combined:

string[] a_str = new string[5];

It is also important to note that like in Java, arrays are passed by reference, and not passed by value. For example, the following code snippet successfully swaps two elements in an integer array:

static void swap (int[] a_iArray, int iI, int iJ)
{
    int iTemp = a_iArray[iI];

    a_iArray[iI] = a_iArray[iJ];
    a_iArray[iJ] = iTemp;
}

It is possible to determine the array size during runtime. The following example assigns the loop counter to the unsigned short array elements:

    ushort[] a_usNumbers = new ushort[234];
    [...]
    for (ushort us = 0; us < a_usNumbers.Length; us++)
    {
        a_usNumbers[us] = us;
    }

Since C# 2.0, it is possible to have arrays also inside of structures.

Text & variable example

[edit | edit source]
using System;

namespace Login
{
  class Username_Password
  {
    public static void Main()
    {
      string username,password;
      Console.Write("Enter username: ");
      username = Console.ReadLine();
      Console.Write("Enter password: ");
      password = Console.ReadLine();

      if (username == "SomePerson" && password == "SomePassword")
      {
      	Console.WriteLine("Access Granted.");
      }
      else if (username != "SomePerson" && password == "SomePassword")
      {
      	Console.WriteLine("The username is wrong.");
      }
      else if (username == "SomePerson" && password != "SomePassword")
      {
      	Console.WriteLine("The password is wrong.");
      }
      else
      {
      	Console.WriteLine("Access Denied.");
      }
    }
  }
}

Conversion

[edit | edit source]

Values of a given type may or may not be explicitly or implicitly convertible to other types depending on predefined conversion rules, inheritance structure, and explicit cast definitions.

Predefined conversions

[edit | edit source]

Many predefined value types have predefined conversions to other predefined value types. If the type conversion is guaranteed not to lose information, the conversion can be implicit (i.e. an explicit cast is not required).

Inheritance polymorphism

[edit | edit source]

A value can be implicitly converted to any class from which it inherits or interface that it implements. To convert a base class to a class that inherits from it, the conversion must be explicit in order for the conversion statement to compile. Similarly, to convert an interface instance to a class that implements it, the conversion must be explicit in order for the conversion statement to compile. In either case, the runtime environment throws a conversion exception if the value to convert is not an instance of the target type or any of its derived types.

Scope and extent

[edit | edit source]

The scope and extent of variables is based on their declaration. The scope of parameters and local variables corresponds to the declaring method or statement block, while the scope of fields is associated with the instance or class and is potentially further restricted by the field's access modifiers.

The extent of variables is determined by the runtime environment using implicit reference counting and a complex garbage collection algorithm.

C# operators and their precedence closely resemble the operators in other languages of the C family.

Similar to C++, classes can overload most operators, defining or redefining the behavior of the operators in contexts where the first argument of that operator is an instance of that class, but doing so is often discouraged for clarity.

Operators can be grouped by their arity as nullary, unary, binary, ternary, n-ary.

Following are the built-in behaviors of C# operators.

Arithmetic

[edit | edit source]

The following arithmetic operators operate on numeric operands (arguments a and b in the "expression" below).

Expression Read Arity Explanation
a + b a plus b binary + returns the sum of its arguments.
a - b a minus b binary - returns the difference between its arguments.
a*b a times b binary * returns the multiplicative product of its arguments.
a/b a divided by b binary / returns the quotient of its arguments. If both of its operators are integers, it obtains that quotient using integer division (i.e. it drops any resulting remainder).
a%b a mod b binary % operates only on integer arguments. It returns the remainder of integer division of those arguments. (See modular arithmetic.)
a++ a plus plus or Postincrement a unary ++ operates only on arguments that have an l-value. When placed after its argument, it increments that argument by 1 and returns the value of that argument before it was incremented.
++a plus plus a or Preincrement a unary ++ operates only on arguments that have an l-value. When placed before its argument, it increments that argument by 1 and returns the resulting value.
a-- a minus minus or Postdecrement a unary -- operates only on arguments that have an l-value. When placed after its argument, it decrements that argument by 1 and returns the value of that argument before it was decremented.
--a minus minus a or Predecrement a unary -- operates only on arguments that have an l-value. When placed before its argument, it decrements that argument by 1 and returns the resulting value.

Logical

[edit | edit source]

The following logical operators operate on boolean or integral operands, as noted.

Expression Read Arity Explanation
a&b a bitwise and b binary & evaluates both of its operands and returns the logical conjunction ("AND") of their results. If the operands are integral, the logical conjunction is performed bitwise.
a&&b a and b binary && operates on boolean operands only. It evaluates its first operand. If the result is false, it returns false. Otherwise, it evaluates and returns the results of the second operand. Note that, if evaluating the second operand would hypothetically have no side effects, the results are identical to the logical conjunction performed by the & operator. This is an example of Short Circuit Evaluation.
a | b a bitwise or b binary | evaluates both of its operands and returns the logical disjunction ("OR") of their results. If the operands are integral, the logical disjunction is performed bitwise.
a || b a or b binary || operates on boolean operands only. It evaluates the first operand. If the result is true, it returns true. Otherwise, it evaluates and returns the results of the second operand. Note that, if evaluating the second operand would hypothetically have no side effects, the results are identical to the logical disjunction performed by the | operator. This is an example of Short Circuit Evaluation.
a ^ b a x-or b binary ^ returns the exclusive or ("XOR") of their results. If the operands are integral, the exclusive or is performed bitwise.
!a not a unary ! operates on a boolean operand only. It evaluates its operand and returns the negation ("NOT") of the result. That is, it returns true if a evaluates to false and it returns false if a evaluates to true.
~a bitwise not a unary ~ operates on integral operands only. It evaluates its operand and returns the bitwise negation of the result. That is, ~a returns a value where each bit is the negation of the corresponding bit in the result of evaluating a.

Bitwise shifting

[edit | edit source]
Expression Read Arity Explanation
a << b a left shift b binary << evaluates its operands and returns the resulting first argument left-shifted by the number of bits specified by the second argument. It discards high-order bits that shift beyond the size of its first argument and sets new low-order bits to zero.
a >> b a right shift b binary >> evaluates its operands and returns the resulting first argument right-shifted by the number of bits specified by the second argument. It discards low-order bits that are shifted beyond the size of its first argument and sets new high-order bits to the sign bit of the first argument, or to zero if the first argument is unsigned.

Relational

[edit | edit source]

The binary relational operators ==, !=, <, >, <=, and >= are used for relational operations and for type comparisons.

Expression Read Arity Explanation
a == b a is equal to b binary For arguments of value type, the operator == returns true, if its operands have the same value, false otherwise. For the string type, it returns true, if the strings' character sequences match. For other reference types (types derived from System.Object), however, a == b returns true only if a and b reference the same object.
a != b a is not equal to b binary The operator != returns the logical negation of the operator ==. Thus, it returns true, if a is not equal to b, and false, if they are equal.
a < b a is less than b binary The operator < operates on integral types. It returns true, if a is less than b, false otherwise.
a > b a is greater than b binary The operator > operates on integral types. It returns true, if a is greater than b, false otherwise.
a <= b a is less than or equal to b binary The operator <= operates on integral types. It returns true, if a is less than or equal to b, false otherwise.
a >= b a is greater than or equal to b binary The operator >= operates on integral types. It returns true, if a is greater than or equal to b, false otherwise.

Assignment

[edit | edit source]

The most basic is the operator =. Not surprisingly, it assigns the value (or reference) of its second argument to its first argument. As such, the assignment operator is binary, but has an n-ary form.

(More technically, the operator = requires for its first (left) argument an expression to which a value can be assigned (an l-value) and for its second (right) argument an expression that can be evaluated (an r-value). That requirement of an assignable expression to its left and a bound expression to its right is the origin of the terms l-value and r-value.)

The first argument of the assignment operator (=) is typically a variable. When that argument has a value type, the assignment operation changes the argument's underlying value. When the first argument is a reference type, the assignment operation changes the reference, so the first argument typically just refers to a different object, but the object that it originally referenced does not change (except that it may no longer be referenced and may thus be a candidate for garbage collection).

Expression Read Arity Explanation
a = b a equals (or set to) b binary The operator = evaluates its second argument and then assigns the results to (the l-value indicated by) its first argument.
a = b = c b set to c, and then a set to b n-ary Equivalent to a = (b = c). When there are consecutive assignments, the right-most assignment is evaluated first, proceeding from right to left. In this example, both variables a and b have the value of c. This may be continued ad infinitum to assign the same r-value to multiple l-values (e.g., a = b = c = d = 0; is equivalent to a = 0; b = 0; c = 0; d = 0;).

Short-hand Assignment

[edit | edit source]

The short-hand assignment operators shortens the common assignment operation of a = a operator b into a operator= b, resulting in less typing and neater syntax.

Expression Read Arity Explanation
a += b a plus equals (or increment by) b binary Equivalent to a = a + b.
a -= b a minus equals (or decrement by) b binary Equivalent to a = a - b.
a *= b a multiply equals (or multiplied by) b binary Equivalent to a = a*b.
a /= b a divide equals (or divided by) b binary Equivalent to a = a/b.
a %= b a mod equals b binary Equivalent to a = a%b.
a &= b a and equals b binary Equivalent to a = a&b.
a |= b a or equals b binary Equivalent to a = a|b.
a ^= b a xor equals b binary Equivalent to a = a^b.
a <<= b a left-shift equals b binary Equivalent to a = a << b.
a >>= b a right-shift equals b binary Equivalent to a = a >> b.

Type information

[edit | edit source]
Expression Read Arity Explanation
x is T is x of type T binary returns true, if the variable x of base class type stores an object of derived class type T, or, if x is of type T. Else returns false.
x as T cast x to T binary returns (T)x (x cast to T), if the variable x of base class type stores an object of derived class type T, or, if x is of type T. Else returns null. Equivalent to x is T ? (T)x : null
sizeof(x) size of x unary returns the size of the value type x. Remarks: The sizeof operator can be applied only to value types, not reference types..
typeof(T) type of T unary returns a System.Type object describing the type. T must be the name of the type, and not a variable. Use the GetType method to retrieve run-time type information of variables.

Pointer manipulation

[edit | edit source]

NOTE: Most C# developers agree that direct manipulation and use of pointers is not recommended in C#. The language has many built-in classes to allow you to do almost any operation you want. C# was built with memory-management in mind and the creation and use of pointers is greatly disruptive to this end. This speaks to the declaration of pointers and the use of pointer notation, not arrays. In fact, a program may only be compiled in "unsafe mode", if it uses pointers.

Expression Read Arity Explanation
*a object at a unary Indirection operator. Allows access the object being pointed.
a->member member member of a binary Similar to the . operator. Allows access to members of classes and structs being pointed.
a[b] object at offset b from a binary Used to index a pointer.
&a reference to a unary References the address of the pointer.
stackalloc a allocate a on the stack binary Allocates memory on the stack, rather than the heap. See C Sharp Programming/Keywords/stackalloc.
fixed a prevent a from being relocated binary Temporarily fixes a variable in order that its address may be found. See C Sharp Programming/Keywords/fixed.

Overflow exception control

[edit | edit source]
Expression Read Arity Explanation
checked(a) evaluate a and check for overflow unary uses overflow checking on value a. See C Sharp Programming/Keywords/checked.
unchecked(a) evaluate a without checking for overflow unary avoids overflow checking on value a. See C Sharp Programming/Keywords/unchecked.

Others

[edit | edit source]
Expression Read Arity Explanation
a.b member b of a binary Accesses member b of type or namespace a. If b is a field, it calls the get function for that field.
a[b] item b in a binary Returns the value of index b in a. Arrays use 0-origin indexing.
(a)b cast b to type a binary Explicitly casts the value b to type a. Type b must have a cast function that casts directly to a or to another type that has a cast function to a.
new a create a new a n-ary Creates an object of type a and calls its default constructor. Type a may include constructors with arguments, in which case it takes the form new a(type1 arg1, type2 arg2, ...). See C Sharp Programming/Keywords/new.
a + b concatenate string b to the end of string a binary If a and b are strings, concatenates a and b. If any addend is null, the empty string ("") is used instead. If one addend is a string and the other one is a non-string object, ToString() is called on that object before concatenation.
a + b concatenate delegate b to delegate a binary If a and b are delegates, performs delegate concatenation.
a ? b : c if a then b else c ternary If a is true, evaluates and returns the value of b, otherwise it evaluates and returns c. Only one of b and c will be evaluated.
a ?? b if a is null then b else a binary If a is null, evaluates and returns the value of b, otherwise evaluates and returns a. If a is non-null, b will not be evaluated.
a?.b if a is not null then evaluate b binary This determines if an object is null before attempting to reference a member field or method. Ternary use in conjunction with ?? to provide an alternative (e.g. a?.b()??c). Can be used in n-ary form with ?[] for continual null-checks (e.g., a?.b()?[c]). (Available since C# 6)
a?[b] if a is not null then get b binary This determines if an array or other structure is null before attempting to reference an item (numeric or identifier). Ternary use in conjunction with ?? to provide an alternative (e.g. a?[b]??c). Can be used in n-ary form with ?. for continual null-checks (e.g., a?.b()?[c]). (Available since C# 6)
@"a" verbatim "a" nullary String constant of verbatim text, i.e., escape characters are ignored.
$"{b}" insert b into the string literal n-ary $ begins a string interpolation statement, which inserts substring(s) into the string literal, useful for quick string-building. A symbol name enclosed in {} will be evaluated to the string value, using ToString() where necessary. (Available since C# 6)
$@"{b}" insert b into the verbatim string literal n-ary Combines the functionality of @ and $. Brace literals can be designated by {{ and }} (Available since C# 6. NOTE: In C# 8 and beyond, the operators may be in either order.)

There are various ways of grouping sets of data together in C#.

Enumerations

[edit | edit source]

An enumeration is a data type that enumerates a set of items by assigning to each of them an identifier (a name), while exposing an underlying base type for ordering the elements of the enumeration. The underlying type is int by default, but can be any one of the integral types except for char.

Enumerations are declared as follows:

 enum Weekday { Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday };

The elements in the above enumeration are then available as constants:

 Weekday day = Weekday.Monday;

 if (day == Weekday.Tuesday)
 {
     Console.WriteLine("Time sure flies by when you program in C#!");
 }

If no explicit values are assigned to the enumerated items as the example above, the first element has the value 0, and the successive values are assigned to each subsequent element. However, specific values from the underlying integral type can be assigned to any of the enumerated elements (note that the variable must be type cast in order to access the base type):

 enum Age { Infant = 0, Teenager = 13, Adult = 18 };
 
 Age myAge = Age.Teenager;
 Console.WriteLine("You become a teenager at an age of {0}.", (int)myAge);

The underlying values of enumerated elements may go unused when the purpose of an enumeration is simply to group a set of items together, e.g., to represent a nation, state, or geographical territory in a more meaningful way than an integer could. Rather than define a group of logically related constants, it is often more readable to use an enumeration.

It may be desirable to create an enumeration with a base type other than int. To do so, specify any integral type besides char as with base class extension syntax after the name of the enumeration, as follows:

 enum CardSuit : byte { Hearts, Diamonds, Spades, Clubs };

The enumeration type is also helpful, if you need to output the value. By calling the .ToString() method on the enumeration, will output the enumerations name (e.g. CardSuit.Hearts.ToString() will output "Hearts").

Structs

[edit | edit source]

Structures (keyword struct) are light-weight objects. They are mostly used when only a data container is required for a collection of value type variables. Structs are similar to classes in that they can have constructors, methods, and even implement interfaces, but there are important differences.

  • Structs are value types while classes are reference types, which means they behave differently when passed into methods as parameters.
  • Structs cannot support inheritance. While structs may appear to be limited with their use, they require less memory and can be less expensive, if used in the proper way.
  • Structs always have a default constructor, even if you don't want one. Classes allow you to hide the constructor away by using the "private" modifier, whereas structures must have one.

A struct can, for example, be declared like this:

 struct Person
 {
     public string name;
     public System.DateTime birthDate;
     public int heightInCm;
     public int weightInKg;
 }

The Person struct can then be used like this:

 Person dana = new Person();
 dana.name = "Dana Developer";
 dana.birthDate = new DateTime(1974, 7, 18);
 dana.heightInCm = 178;
 dana.weightInKg = 50;
 
 if (dana.birthDate < DateTime.Now)
 {
     Console.WriteLine("Thank goodness! Dana Developer isn't from the future!");
 }

It is also possible to provide constructors to structs to make it easier to initialize them:

 using System;
 struct Person
 {
     string name;
     DateTime birthDate;
     int heightInCm;
     int weightInKg;
 
     public Person(string name, DateTime birthDate, int heightInCm, int weightInKg)
     {
         this.name = name;
         this.birthDate = birthDate;
         this.heightInCm = heightInCm;
         this.weightInKg = weightInKg;
     }
 }
 
 public class StructWikiBookSample
 {
     public static void Main()
     {
         Person dana = new Person("Dana Developer", new DateTime(1974, 7, 18), 178, 50);
     }
 }

There is also an alternative syntax for initializing structs:

struct Person
{
    public string Name;
    public int Height;
    public string Occupation;
}

public class StructWikiBookSample2
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Person john = new Person { Name = "John", Height = 182, Occupation = "Programmer" };
    }
}

Structs are really only used for performance reasons or, if you intend to reference it by value. Structs work best when holding a total equal to or less than 16 bytes of data. If in doubt, use classes.

Arrays

[edit | edit source]

Arrays represent a set of items all belonging to the same type. The declaration itself may use a variable or a constant to define the length of the array. However, an array has a set length and it cannot be changed after declaration.

// an array whose length is defined with a constant
int[] integers = new int[20];

int length = 0;
System.Console.Write("How long should the array be? ");
length = int.Parse(System.Console.ReadLine());
// an array whose length is defined with a variable
// this array still can't change length after declaration
double[] doubles = new double[length];

Conditional, iteration, jump, and exception handling statements control a program's flow of execution.

A conditional statement can decide something using keywords such as if, switch.

An iteration statement can create a loop using keywords such as do, while, for, foreach, and in.

A jump statement can be used to transfer program control using keywords such as break, continue, return, and yield.

Conditional statements

[edit | edit source]

A conditional statement decides whether to execute code based on conditions. The if statement and the switch statement are the two types of conditional statements in C#.

if statement

[edit | edit source]

As with most of C#, the if statement has the same syntax as in C, C++, and Java. Thus, it is written in the following form:

if (condition)
{
  // Do something
} 
else
{
  // Do something else
}

The if statement evaluates its condition expression to determine whether to execute the if-body. Optionally, an else clause can immediately follow the if body, providing code to execute when the condition is false. Making the else-body another if statement creates the common cascade of if, else if, else if, else if, else statements:

using System;

public class IfStatementSample
{
    public void IfMyNumberIs()
    {
        int myNumber = 5;

        if ( myNumber == 4 )
            Console.WriteLine("This will not be shown because myNumber is not 4.");
        else if( myNumber < 0 )
        {
            Console.WriteLine("This will not be shown because myNumber is not negative.");
        }
        else if( myNumber % 2 == 0 )
            Console.WriteLine("This will not be shown because myNumber is not even.");
        else
        {
            Console.WriteLine("myNumber does not match the coded conditions, so this sentence will be shown!");
        }
    }
}

switch statement

[edit | edit source]

The switch statement is similar to the statement from C, C++ and Java.

Unlike C, each case statement must finish with a jump statement (that can be break or goto or return). In other words, C# does not support "fall through" from one case statement to the next (thereby eliminating a common source of unexpected behaviour in C programs). However "stacking" of cases is allowed, as in the example below. If goto is used, it may refer to a case label or the default case (e.g. goto case 0 or goto default).

The default label is optional. If no default case is defined, then the default behaviour is to do nothing.

A simple example:

switch (nCPU)
{
    case 0:
        Console.WriteLine("You don't have a CPU! :-)");
        break;
    case 1:
        Console.WriteLine("Single processor computer");
        break;
    case 2:
        Console.WriteLine("Dual processor computer");
        break;
        // Stacked cases
    case 3:
        // falls through
    case 4:
        // falls through
    case 5:
        // falls through
    case 6:
        // falls through
    case 7:
        // falls through
    case 8:
        Console.WriteLine("A multi processor computer");
        break;
    default:
        Console.WriteLine("A seriously parallel computer");
        break;
}

A nice improvement over the C switch statement is that the switch variable can be a string. For example:

switch (aircraftIdent)
{
    case "C-FESO":
        Console.WriteLine("Rans S6S Coyote");
        break;
    case "C-GJIS":
        Console.WriteLine("Rans S12XL Airaile");
        break;
    default:
        Console.WriteLine("Unknown aircraft");
        break;
}

Iteration statements

[edit | edit source]

An iteration statement creates a loop of code to execute a variable number of times. The for loop, the do loop, the while loop, and the foreach loop are the iteration statements in C#.

do ... while loop

[edit | edit source]

The do...while loop likewise has the same syntax as in other languages derived from C. It is written in the following form:

do...while-loop ::= "do" body "while" "(" condition ")"
condition ::= boolean-expression
body ::= statement-or-statement-block

The do...while loop always runs its body once. After its first run, it evaluates its condition to determine whether to run its body again. If the condition is true, the body executes. If the condition evaluates to true again after the body has run, the body executes again. When the condition evaluates to false, the do...while loop ends.

using System;

public class DoWhileLoopSample
{
    public void PrintValuesFromZeroToTen()
    {
        int number = 0;

        do
        {
            Console.WriteLine(number++.ToString());
        } while(number <= 10);
    }
}

The above code writes the integers from 0 to 10 to the console.

for loop

[edit | edit source]

The for loop likewise has the same syntax as in other languages derived from C. It is written in the following form:

for-loop ::= "for" "(" initialization ";" condition ";" iteration ")" body
initialization ::= variable-declaration | list-of-statements
condition ::= boolean-expression
iteration ::= list-of-statements
body ::= statement-or-statement-block

The initialization variable declaration or statements are executed the first time through the for loop, typically to declare and initialize an index variable. The condition expression is evaluated before each pass through the body to determine whether to execute the body. It is often used to test an index variable against some limit. If the condition evaluates to true, the body is executed. The iteration statements are executed after each pass through the body, typically to increment or decrement an index variable.

public class ForLoopSample
{
    public void ForFirst100NaturalNumbers()
    {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
        {
            System.Console.WriteLine(i.ToString());
        }
    }
}

The above code writes the integers from 0 to 99 to the console.

foreach loop

[edit | edit source]

The foreach statement is similar to the for statement in that both allow code to iterate over the items of collections, but the foreach statement lacks an iteration index, so it works even with collections that lack indices altogether. It is written in the following form:

foreach-loop ::= "foreach" "(" variable-declaration "in" enumerable-expression ")" body
body ::= statement-or-statement-block

The enumerable-expression is an expression of a type that implements '''IEnumerable''', so it can be an array or a collection. The variable-declaration declares a variable that will be set to the successive elements of the enumerable-expression for each pass through the body. The foreach loop exits when there are no more elements of the enumerable-expression to assign to the variable of the variable-declaration.

public class ForEachSample
{
    public void DoSomethingForEachItem()
    {
        string[] itemsToWrite = {"Alpha", "Bravo", "Charlie"};

        foreach (string item in itemsToWrite)
        System.Console.WriteLine(item);
    }
}

In the above code, the foreach statement iterates over the elements of the string array to write "Alpha", "Bravo", and "Charlie" to the console.

while loop

[edit | edit source]

The while loop has the same syntax as in other languages derived from C. It is written in the following form:

while-loop ::= "while" "(" condition ")" body
condition ::= boolean-expression
body ::= statement-or-statement-block

The while loop evaluates its condition to determine whether to run its body. If the condition is true, the body executes. If the condition then evaluates to true again, the body executes again. When the condition evaluates to false, the while loop ends.

using System;

public class WhileLoopSample
{
    public void RunForAWhile()
    {
        TimeSpan durationToRun = new TimeSpan(0, 0, 30);
        DateTime start = DateTime.Now;

        while (DateTime.Now - start < durationToRun)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("not finished yet");
        }
        Console.WriteLine("finished");
    }
}

Jump statements

[edit | edit source]

A jump statement can be used to transfer program control using keywords such as break, continue, return, yield, and throw.

break

[edit | edit source]

A break statement is used to exit from a case in a switch statement and also used to exit from for, foreach, while, do .. while loops that will switch the control to the statement immediately after the end of the loop.

using System;

namespace JumpSample
{
    public class Entry
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int i;
 
            for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) // see the comparison, i < 10
            {
                if (i >= 3)
                {
                    break; 
                    // Not run over the code, and get out of loop.
                    // Note: The rest of code will not be executed,
                    //       & it leaves the loop instantly
                }
            }
            // Here check the value of i, it will be 3, not 10.
            Console.WriteLine("The value of OneExternCounter: {0}", i);
        }
    }
}

continue

[edit | edit source]

The continue keyword transfers program control just before the end of a loop. The condition for the loop is then checked, and if it is met, the loop performs another iteration.

using System;

namespace JumpSample
{
    public class Entry
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int OneExternCounter = 0;

            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
            {
                if (i >= 5)
                {
                    continue;   // Not run over the code, and return to the beginning 
                                // of the scope as if it had completed the loop
                }
                OneExternCounter += 1;
            }
            // Here check the value of OneExternCounter, it will be 5, not 10.
            Console.WriteLine("The value of OneExternCounter: {0}", OneExternCounter);
        }
    }
}

return

[edit | edit source]

The return keyword identifies the return value for the function or method (if any), and transfers control to the end of the function.

namespace JumpSample
{
    public class Entry
    {
        static int Fun()
        {
            int a = 3;
            return a; // the code terminates here from this function
            a = 9;    // here is a block that will not be executed
        }

        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int OnNumber = Fun();
            // the value of OnNumber is 3, not 9...
        }
    }
}

yield

[edit | edit source]

The yield keyword is used to define an iterator block that produces values for an enumerator. It is typically used within a method implementation of the IEnumerable interface as an easy way to create an iterator. It is written in the following forms:

yield ::= "yield" "return" expression
yield ::= "yield" "break"

The following example shows the usage of the yield keyword inside the method MyCounter. This method defines an iterator block, and will return an enumerator object that generates the value of a counter from zero to stop, incrementing by step for each value generated.

using System;
using System.Collections;

public class YieldSample
{
    public static IEnumerable MyCounter(int stop, int step)
    {
        int i;

        for (i = 0; i < stop; i += step)
        {
            yield return i;
        }
    }

    static void Main()
    {
        foreach (int j in MyCounter(10, 2))
        {
            Console.WriteLine("{0} ", j);
        }
        // Will display 0 2 4 6 8
    }
}

throw

[edit | edit source]

The throw keyword throws an exception. If it is located within a try block, it will transfer the control to a catch block that matches the exception - otherwise, it will check if any calling functions are contained within the matching catch block and transfer execution there. If no functions contain a catch block, the program may terminate because of an unhandled exception.

namespace ExceptionSample
{
    public class Warrior
    {
        private string Name { get; set; }

        public Warrior(string name)
        {
            if (name == "Piccolo")
            {
                throw new Exception("Piccolo can't battle!");
            }
        }
    }

    public class Entry
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            try
            {
                Warrior a = new Warrior("Goku");
                Warrior b = new Warrior("Vegeta");
                Warrior c = new Warrior("Piccolo"); // exception here!
            }
            catch(Exception e)
            {
                Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
            }
        }
    }
}

Exceptions and the throw statement are described in greater detail in the Exceptions chapter.

Introduction

[edit | edit source]

Software Programmers write code to perform some desired actions. But every software may fail to perform its desired actions for internal or external reasons. The exception handling system in the C# language allows the programmer to handle errors or anomalous situations in a structured manner that allows the programmer to separate the normal flow of the code from error-handling logic.

An exception can represent a variety of abnormal conditions that arise during the execution of the software. Such conditions can be internal or externally caused. External conditions of execution failures include, for example, network failures in connecting to a remote component, inadequate rights in using a file/system resource, out of memory exceptions or exceptions thrown by a web service etc. These are mainly due to failures thrown by environment components on which our application depends, e.g. the operating system, the .NET runtime or external applications or components. Internal failures may be due to software defects, designed functional failures (failures required as per business rules), propagated external failures, e.g. a null object reference detected by the runtime system, an invalid input string entered by a user and detected by application code, or a user requesting to withdraw a larger amount than the account balance (business rule).

Code that detects an error condition is said to throw an exception and code that handles the error is said to catch the exception. An exception in C# is an object that encapsulates various pieces of information about the error that occurred, such as the stack trace at the point of the exception and a descriptive error message. All exception objects are instantiations of the System.Exception class or a child class of it. There are many exception classes defined in the .NET Framework used for various purposes. Programmers may also define their own class inheriting from System.Exception or some other appropriate exception class from the .NET Framework.

Microsoft recommendations prior to version 2.0 recommended that a developer's exception classes should inherit from the ApplicationException exception class. After 2.0 was released, this recommendation was made obsolete and users' exception classes should now inherit from the Exception class[1].

Overview

[edit | edit source]

There are three code definitions for exception handling. These are:

  • try/catch - Do something and catch an error, if it should occur.
  • try/catch/finally - Do something and catch an error if it should occur, but always do the finally.
  • try/finally - Do something, but always do the finally. Any exception that occurs, will be thrown after finally.

Exceptions are caught in the order from most specific to least specific. So for example, if you try and access a file that does not exist, the CLR would look for exception handlers in the following order:

  • FileNotFoundException
  • IOException (base class of FileNotFoundException)
  • SystemException (base class of IOException)
  • Exception (base class of SystemException)

If the exception being thrown does not derive from or is not in the list of exceptions to catch, it is thrown up the call stack.

Below are some examples of the different types of exceptions

Examples

[edit | edit source]

try/catch

[edit | edit source]

The try/catch performs an operation and should an error occur, will transfer control to the catch block, should there be a valid section to be caught by:

class ExceptionTest
{
     public static void Main(string[] args)
     {
          try
          {
               Console.WriteLine(args[0]);
               Console.WriteLine(args[1]);
               Console.WriteLine(args[2]);
               Console.WriteLine(args[3]);
               Console.WriteLine(args[4]);
          }
          catch (ArgumentOutOfRangeException e)
          {
               Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
          }
     }
}

Here is an example with multiple catches:

class ExceptionTest
{
     public static void Main(string[] args)
     {
          try
          {
               string fileContents = new StreamReader(@"C:\log.txt").ReadToEnd();
          }
          catch (UnauthorizedAccessException e) // Access problems
          {
               Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
          }
          catch (FileNotFoundException e)       // File does not exist
          {
               Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
          }
          catch (IOException e)                // Some other IO problem.
          {
               Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
          }
     }
}

In all catch statements you may omit the type of exception and the exception variable name:

try
{
    int number = 1/0;
}
catch (DivideByZeroException)
{
    // DivideByZeroException
}
catch
{
    // some other exception
}

try/catch/finally

[edit | edit source]

Catching the problem is a good idea, but it can sometimes leave your program in an invalid state. For example, if you open a connection to a database, an error occurs and you throw an exception. Where would you close the connection? In both the try AND exception blocks? Well, problems may occur before the close is carried out.

Therefore, the finally statement allows you to cater for the "in all cases do this" circumstance. See the example below:

using System;
class ExceptionTest
{
     public static void Main(string[] args)
     {
          SqlConnection sqlConn = null;

          try
          {
              sqlConn = new SqlConnection ( /*Connection here*/ );
              sqlConn.Open();
 
              // Various DB things
        
              // Notice you do not need to explicitly close the connection, as .Dispose() does this for you.
          }
          catch (SqlException e)
          {
               Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
          }
          finally
          {
               if (sqlConn != null && sqlConn.State != ConnectionState.Closed)
               {
                   sqlConn.Dispose();
               }
          }
     }
}

Second Example

using System;
public class excepation
{
	public double num1, num2,result;
			
	public void add()
	{
		try
		{
			Console.WriteLine("enter your number");
			num1 = Convert.ToInt32(Console.ReadLine());
			num2 = Convert.ToInt32(Console.ReadLine());
			result = num1/num2;
		}
		catch(DivideByZeroException  e) //FormatException
		{
			Console.WriteLine("{0}",e.Message);
		}
		catch(FormatException ex)
		{
			Console.WriteLine("{0}",ex.Message);
		}
		finally
		{
			Console.WriteLine("turn over");
		}
	}
	public void display()
	{
		Console.WriteLine("The Result is: {0}",result);
	}
	public static void Main()
	{
		excepation ex = new excepation();
		ex.add();
		ex.display();
	}	
}

Notice that the SqlConnection object is declared outside of the try/catch/finally. The reason is that anything declared in the try/catch cannot be seen by the finally. By declaring it in the previous scope, the finally block is able to access it.

try/finally

[edit | edit source]

The try/finally block allows you to do the same as above, but instead errors that are thrown are dealt with by the catch (if possible) and then thrown up the call stack.

class ExceptionTest
{
     public static void Main(string[] args)
     {
          SqlConnection sqlConn = null;

          try
          {
              SqlConnection sqlConn = new SqlConnection ( /*Connection here*/ );
              sqlConn.Open();
 
              // Various DB bits
          }
          finally
          {
               if (sqlConn != null && sqlConn.State != ConnectionState.Closed)
               {
                   sqlConn.Dispose();
               }
          }
     }
}

Re-throwing exceptions

[edit | edit source]

Sometimes it is better to throw the error up the call stack for two reasons.

  1. It is not something you would expect to happen.
  2. You are placing extra information into the exception, to help diagnosis.


How not to throw exceptions

[edit | edit source]

Some developers write empty try/catch statements like this:

try
{
      // Do something
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
      // Ignore this here
}

This approach is not recommended. You are swallowing the error and continuing on. If this exception was an OutOfMemoryException or a NullReferenceException, it would not be wise to continue. Therefore you should always catch what you would expect to occur, and throw everything else.

Below is another example of how exceptions are caught incorrectly

/* Read the config file, and return the integer value. If it does not exist, then this is a problem! */

try
{
     string value = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Timeout"];

     if (value == null)
         throw new ConfigurationErrorsException("Timeout value is not in the configuration file.");
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
     // Do nothing!
}

As you can see, the ConfigurationErrorsException will be caught by the catch (Exception) block, but it is being ignored completely! This is bad programming as you are ignoring the error.

The following is also bad practice:

try
{
   ..
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
     throw ex;
}

The CLR will now think the throw ex; statement is the source of the problem, when the problem is actually in the try section. Therefore never re-throw in this way.

How to catch exceptions

[edit | edit source]

A better approach would be:

/* Read the config file, and return the integer value. If it does not exist, then this is a problem! */

try
{
     string value = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Timeout"];

     if (value == null)
         throw new ConfigurationErrorsException("Timeout value is not in the configuration file.");
}
catch (Exception ex )
{
     throw; // <-- Throw the existing problem!
}

The throw; keyword means preserve the exception information and throw it up the call stack.

Extra information within exceptions

[edit | edit source]

An alternative is to give extra information (maybe local variable information) in addition to the exception. In this case, you wrap the exception within another. You usually use an exception that is as specific to the problem as possible, or create your own, if you cannot find out that is not specific enough (or if there is extra information you would wish to include).

public OrderItem LoadItem(string itemNumber)
{
    DataTable dt = null;

    try
    {
         if (itemNumber == null)
              throw new ArgumentNullException("Item Number cannot be null","itemNumber");

         DataTable dt = DataAccess.OrderItem.Load(itemNumber);
  
         if (dt.Rows == 0)
              return null;
         else if (dt.Rows > 1)
              throw new DuplicateDataException( "Multiple items map to this item.",itemNumber, dt);

         OrderItem item = OrderItem.CreateInstanceFromDataRow(dt.Rows[0]);

         if (item == null)
              throw new ErrorLoadingException("Error loading Item " + itemNumber, itemNumber, dt.Rows[0]);
    }
    catch (DuplicateDataException dde)
    {
         throw new ErrorLoadingException("OrderItem.LoadItem failed with Item " + 
                                                            itemNumber, dde); // <-- Include dde (as the InnerException) parameter
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
         throw; // <-- We aren't expecting any other problems, so throw them if they occur.
    }
}

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. [ApplicationException made obsolete]

Classes

[edit | edit source]

Namespaces are used to provide a "named space" in which your application resides. They're used especially to provide the C# compiler a context for all the named information in your program, such as variable names. Without namespaces, for example, you wouldn't be able to make a class named Console, as .NET already uses one in its System namespace. The purpose of namespaces is to solve this problem, and release thousands of names defined in the .NET Framework for your applications to use, along with making it so your application doesn't occupy names for other applications, if your application is intended to be used in conjunction with another. So namespaces exist to resolve ambiguities a compiler wouldn't otherwise be able to do.

Namespaces are easily defined in this way:

 namespace MyApplication
 {
     // The content to reside in the MyApplication namespace is placed here.
 }

There is an entire hierarchy of namespaces provided to you by the .NET Framework, with the System namespace usually being by far the most commonly seen one. Data in a namespace is referred to by using the . operator, such as:

 System.Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!");

This will call the WriteLine method that is a member of the Console class within the System namespace.

By using the using keyword, you explicitly tell the compiler that you'll be using a certain namespace in your program. Since the compiler would then know that, it no longer requires you to type the namespace name(s) for such declared namespaces, as you told it which namespaces it should look in, if it couldn't find the data in your application.

So one can then type like this:

 using System;
 
 namespace MyApplication
 {
   class MyClass
   {
     void ShowGreeting()
     {
         Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!"); // note how System is now not required
     }
   }
 }

Namespaces are global, so a namespace in one C# source file, and another with the same name in another source file, will cause the compiler to treat the different named information in these two source files as residing in the same namespace.

Nested namespaces

[edit | edit source]

Normally, your entire application resides under its own special namespace, often named after your application or project name. Sometimes, companies with an entire product series decide to use nested namespaces though, where the "root" namespace can share the name of the company, and the nested namespaces the respective project names. This can be especially convenient, if you're a developer who has made a library with some usual functionality that can be shared across programs. If both the library and your program shared a parent namespace, that one would then not have to be explicitly declared with the using keyword, and still not have to be completely typed out. If your code was open for others to use, third party developers that may use your code would additionally then see that the same company had developed the library and the program. The developer of the library and program would finally also separate all the named information in their product source codes, for fewer headaches especially, if common names are used.

To make your application reside in a nested namespace, you can show this in two ways. Either like this:

 namespace CodeWorks
 {
     namespace MyApplication
     {
         // Do stuff
     }
 }

... or like this:

 namespace CodeWorks.MyApplication
 {
     // Do stuff
 }

Both methods are accepted, and are identical in what they do.


As in other object-oriented programming languages, the functionality of a C# program is implemented in one or more classes. The methods and properties of a class contain the code that defines how the class behaves.

C# classes support information hiding by encapsulating functionality in properties and methods and by enabling several types of polymorphism, including subtyping polymorphism via inheritance and parametric polymorphism via generics.

Several types of C# classes can be defined, including instance classes (standard classes that can be instantiated), static classes, and structures.

Classes are defined using the keyword class followed by an identifier to name the class. Instances of the class can then be created with the new keyword followed by the name of the class.

The code below defines a class called Employee with properties Name and Age and with empty methods GetPayCheck() and Work(). It also defines a Sample class that instantiates and uses the Employee class:

public class Employee
{
    private int _Age;
    private string _Name;

    public int Age
    {
        get { return _Age; }
        set { _Age = value; }
    }

    public string Name
    {
        get { return _Name; }
        set { _Name = value; }
    }

    public void GetPayCheck()
    {
    }

    public void Work()
    {
    }
}

public class Sample
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Employee marissa = new Employee();

        marissa.Work();
        marissa.GetPayCheck();
    }
}

Methods

[edit | edit source]

C# methods are class members containing code. They may have a return value and a list of parameters, as well as a generic type declaration. Like fields, methods can be static (associated with and accessed through the class) or instance (associated with and accessed through an object instance of the class methods as well as a generic type declaration.

From C# 4.0 onwards, it is possible for a method to have optional parameters with default values, as users of C++ already know. For example, the method

void Increment(ref int x, int dx = 1)

can be called with one parameter only, as the second parameter, dx, is initialised to a default value.[1]

Constructors of classes

[edit | edit source]

A class's constructors control its initialization. A constructor's code executes to initialize an instance of the class when a program requests a new object of the class's type. Constructors often set properties of their classes, but they are not restricted to doing so.

Like other methods, a constructor can have parameters. To create an object using a constructor with parameters, the new command accepts parameters. The code below defines and then instantiates multiple objects of the Employee class, once using the constructor without parameters and once using the version with a parameter:

public class Employee
{
    public Employee()
    {
        System.Console.WriteLine("Constructed without parameters");
    }

    public Employee(string strText)
    {
        System.Console.WriteLine(strText);
    }
}

public class Sample
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        System.Console.WriteLine("Start");
        Employee Alfred = new Employee();
        Employee Billy  = new Employee("Parameter for construction");
        System.Console.WriteLine("End");
    }

Output:

Start
Constructed without parameters
Parameter for construction
End

Constructors can call each other:

public class Employee
{
    public Employee(string strText, int iNumber)
    {
        ...
    }
    
    public Employee(string strText)
        : this(strText, 1234) // calls the above constructor with user-specified text and the default number
    { }
    
    public Employee()
        : this("default text") // calls the above constructor with the default text
    { }
}

Finalizers (Destructors)

[edit | edit source]

The opposite of constructors, finalizers define the final behavior of an object and execute when the object is no longer in use. Although they are often used in C++ to free resources reserved by an object, they are less frequently used in C# due to the .NET Framework Garbage Collector. An object's finalizer, which takes no parameters, is called sometime after an object is no longer referenced, but the complexities of garbage collection make the specific timing of finalizers uncertain.

public class Employee
{
    public Employee(string strText)
    {
        System.Console.WriteLine(strText);
    }

    ~Employee()
    {
        System.Console.WriteLine("Finalized!");
    }

    public static void Main()
    {
        Employee marissa = new Employee("Constructed!");

        marissa = null;
    }
}

Output:

Constructed!
Finalized!

Properties

[edit | edit source]

C# properties are class members that expose functionality of methods using the syntax of fields. They simplify the syntax of calling traditional get and set methods (a.k.a. accessor methods). Like methods, they can be static or instance.

Properties are defined in the following way:

public class MyClass
{
    private int m_iField = 3; // Sets integerField with a default value of 3

    public int IntegerField
    {
        get
        {
            return m_iField;  // get returns the field you specify when this property is assigned
        }
        set
        {
            m_iField = value; // set assigns the value assigned to the property of the field you specify
        }
    }
}

An even shorter way for getter/setter methods are accessors that do both in one line:

class Culture
{
    public int TalkedCountries { get; set; }
    public string Language { get; set; }
}

class InterculturalDialogue
{
    Culture culture;

    culture.Language = "Italian";  // ==> culture.SetLanguage("Italian");

    string strThisLanguage = culture.Language; // ==> ... = culture.GetLanguage();
}

The code is equivalent to a GetLanguage and SetLanguage method definition, but without having to define these methods. The user can directly access the member, if it is not private, of course.

The C# keyword value contains the value assigned to the property. After a property is defined it can be used like a variable. If you were to write some additional code in the get and set portions of the property it would work like a method and allow you to manipulate the data before it is read or written to the variable.

public class MyProgram
{
    MyClass myClass = new MyClass;

    Console.WriteLine(myClass.IntegerField); // Writes 3 to the command line.
    myClass.IntegerField = 7; // Indirectly assigns 7 to the field myClass.m_iField     
}

Using properties in this way provides a clean, easy to use mechanism for protecting data.

Indexers

[edit | edit source]

C# indexers are class members that define the behavior of the array access operation (e.g. list[0] to access the first element of list even when list is not an array).

To create an indexer, use the this keyword as in the following example:

public string this[string strKey]
{
    get { return coll[strKey]; }
    set { coll[strKey] = value; }
}

This code will create a string indexer that returns a string value. For example, if the class was EmployeeCollection, you could write code similar to the following:

EmployeeCollection e = new EmployeeCollection();
.
.
.
string s = e["Jones"];
e["Smith"] = "xxx";

Events

[edit | edit source]

C# events are class members that expose notifications to clients of the class. Events are only fired and never assigned.

using System;

// Note: You need to know some about delegate, properties and methods to understand this sample
namespace EventSample
{
    /// <summary>
    /// This delegate defines the signature of the appropriate method
    /// </summary>
    public delegate void ContractHandler(Employee sender);

    /// <summary>
    ///     Employee class
    /// </summary>
    public class Employee
    {
        /// <summary>
        ///     Field for the info whether or not the Employee is engaged
        /// </summary>
        private bool bIsEngaged = false;
        /// <summary>
        ///     Age of the employee
        /// </summary>
        private int iAge = -1;
        /// <summary>
        ///     Name of the employee
        /// </summary>
        private String strName = null;

        /// <summary>
        /// *** The our event *** 
        /// Is a collection of methods that will be called when it fires
        /// </summary>
        public event ContractHandler Engaged;

        /// <summary>
        ///     Standard constructor
        /// </summary>
        public Employee()
        {
            // Here, we are adding a new method with appropriate signature (defined by delegate)
            // note: when an event has no method and it was fired, it causes an exception!
            //       for all effects when programming with events, assign one private method to event
            //       or simply do a verification before firing it! --> if (event != null)
            this.Engaged += new ContractHandler(this.OnEngaged);
        }

        /// <summary>
        ///     Event handler for the "engaged" event
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="sender">
        ///     Sender object
        /// </param>
        private void OnEngaged(Employee sender)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("private void OnEngaged was called! this employee is engaged now!");
        }

        /// <summary>
        ///     Accessor for the employee name
        /// </summary>
        public string Name
        {
            get
            {
                return strName;
            }

            set
            {
                strName = value;
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        ///     Accessor for the employee age
        /// </summary>
        public int Age
        {
            get
            {
                return m_iAge;
            }

            set
            {
                m_iAge = value;
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        ///     Accessor for the information about employee engagement
        /// </summary>
        public bool IsEngaged
        {
            get
            {
                return bIsEngaged;
            }

            set
            {
                if (bIsEngaged == false && value == true)
                {
                    // here we fires event (call all the methods that it have)
                    // all times when IsEngaged is false and set to true;
                    Engaged(this);
                }

                bIsEngaged = value;
            }
        }
    }

    /// <summary>
    ///     Class for the entry point
    /// </summary>
    public class EntryPointClass
    {
        static void Main(string[] a_strArgs)
        {
            Employee simpleEmployee = new Employee();

            simpleEmployee.Age = 18;
            simpleEmployee.Name = "Samanta Rock";
            
            // Here...
            // This is saying when the event fires, the method added to event are called too.
            // note that we cannot use =
            // is only += to add methods to event or -= do retire an event
            simpleEmployee.Engaged += new ContractHandler(SimpleEmployee_Engaged);
        
            // make attention here...
            // when I assign true to this property, 
            // the event Engaged will be called
            // when event is called, all method that it have, are called!
            simpleEmployee.IsEngaged = true;

            Console.ReadLine();

            return;
        }

        /// <summary>
        ///     Event handler for the registered "engaged" event
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="sender">
        ///     Event sender
        /// </param>
        static void SimpleEmployee_Engaged(Employee sender)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("The employee {0} is happy!", sender.Name);
        }
    }
}

See also here for details.

Operator overloading

[edit | edit source]

C# operator definitions are class members that define or redefine the behavior of basic C# operators (called implicitly or explicitly) on instances of the class:

public class Complex
{
    private double m_dReal, m_dImaginary;
    
    public double Real
    {
        get { return m_dReal; }
        set { m_dReal = value; }
    }
    
    public double Imaginary
    {
        get { return m_dImaginary; }
        set { m_dImaginary = value; }
    }
    
    // binary operator overloading
    public static Complex operator +(Complex c1, Complex c2)
    {
        return new Complex() { Real = c1.Real + c2.Real, Imaginary = c1.Imaginary + c2.Imaginary };
    }
    
    // unary operator overloading
    public static Complex operator -(Complex c)
    {
        return new Complex() { Real = -c.Real, Imaginary = -c.Imaginary };
    }
    
    // cast operator overloading (both implicit and explicit)
    public static implicit operator double(Complex c)
    {
        // return the modulus - sqrt(x^2 + y^2)
        return Math.Sqrt(Math.Pow(c.Real, 2) + Math.Pow(c.Imaginary, 2));
    }
    
    public static explicit operator string(Complex c)
    {
        // we should be overloading the ToString() method, but this is just a demonstration
        return c.Real.ToString() + " + " + c.Imaginary.ToString() + "i";
    }
}

public class StaticDemo
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Complex number1 = new Complex() { Real = 1, Imaginary = 2 };
        Complex number2 = new Complex() { Real = 4, Imaginary = 10 };
        Complex number3 = number1 + number2; // number3 now has Real = 5, Imaginary = 12
        
        number3 = -number3; // number3 now has Real = -5, Imaginary = -12
        double testNumber = number3; // testNumber will be set to the absolute value of number3
        Console.WriteLine((string)number3); // This will print "-5 + -12i".
        // The cast to string was needed because that was an explicit cast operator.
    }
}

Structures

[edit | edit source]

Structures, or structs, are defined with the struct keyword followed by an identifier to name the structure. They are similar to classes, but have subtle differences. Structs are used as lightweight versions of classes that can help reduce memory management efforts when working with small data structures. In most situations, however, using a standard class is a better choice.

The principal difference between structs and classes is that instances of structs are values whereas instances of classes are references. Thus when you pass a struct to a function by value you get a copy of the object so changes to it are not reflected in the original because there are now two distinct objects but if you pass an instance of a class by reference then there is only one instance.

The Employee structure below declares a public and a private field. Access to the private field is granted through the public property Name:

struct Employee
{
    public int m_iAge;
    private string m_strName;

    public string Name
    {
        get { return m_strName; }
        set { m_strName = value; }
    }
}

Since C# 2.0, is possible to have arrays inside structures, but only in unsafe contexts:

struct data
{
    int header;
    fixed int values[10];
}

The array is accessed using pointer arithmetic. Values are treat arrayed values as if they were C-style arrays using indexing, etc.

Structure constructors

[edit | edit source]

Structures need constructors - or better to say initialisers, as they do not construct but just initialise the memory[2] - so that their contents are not left uninitialised. Therefore, constructors without parametres are not allowed.

Structure variables can be assigned one to another if and only if the structure variable on the right side of the assignment are all initialised.[3]

struct Timestamp
{
    private ushort m_usYear;
    private ushort m_usMonth;
    private ushort m_usDayOfMonth;
    private ushort m_usHour;
    private ushort m_usMinute;
    private ushort m_usSecond;

    public Timestamp(ushort usYear,
        ushort usMonth,
        ushort usDay,
        ushort usHour,
        ushort usMinute,
        ushort usSecond)
    {
        m_usYear = usYear - 1900;
        m_usMonth = usMonth;
        m_usDay = usDay;
        m_usHour = usHour;
        m_usMinute = usMinute;
        m_usSecond = usSecond;
    }
}

Static classes

[edit | edit source]

Static classes are commonly used to implement a Singleton Pattern. All of the methods, properties, and fields of a static class are also static (like the WriteLine() method of the System.Console class) and can thus be used without instantiating the static class:

public static class Writer
{
    public static void Write()
    {
        System.Console.WriteLine("Text");
    }
}

public class Sample
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Writer.Write();
    }
}

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. [[[w:C_Sharp_syntax#Optional_parameters|Optional parameters]] "Optional parameters"]. Retrieved 2018-02-01. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  2. Greg Beech (2008-06-16). "Structure constructors". http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/: MSDN. Retrieved 2012-04-12. Because structures are simply an inline area of memory, they cannot be null, and so the CLR has to be able to ensure that the area of memory is totally initialized rather than being partly garbage. For this reason, you'll often hear the 'constructors' on structures called (arguably more correctly) 'initializers' because the don't construct an object they just initialize an area of memory. {{cite web}}: External link in |location= (help)
  3. John Sharp. "Microsoft® Visual C#® 2005 Step by Step / Copying Structure Variables". http://books.google.at/: Google Books. Retrieved 2012-04-12. You're allowed to initialize or assign one struct variable to another struct variable, but only if the struct variable on the right side is completely initialized (that is, if all its fields are initialized). {{cite web}}: External link in |location= (help)


Introduction

[edit | edit source]

The .NET framework consists of several languages, all which follow the "object orientated programming" (OOP) approach to software development. This standard defines that all objects support

  • Inheritance - the ability to inherit and extend existing functionality.
  • Encapsulation - the ability to allow the user to only see specific parts, and to interact with it in specific ways.
  • Polymorphism - the ability for an object to be assigned dynamically, but with some predictability as to what can be done with the object.

Objects are synonymous with objects in the real world. Think of any object and think of how it looks and how it is measured and interacted with. When creating OOP languages, the reasoning was that if it mimics the thought process of humans, it would simplify the coding experience.

For example, let's consider a chair, and its dimensions, weight, colour and what is it made out of. In .NET, these values are called "Properties". These are values that define the object's state. Be careful, as there are two ways to expose values: Fields and Properties. The recommended approach is expose Properties and not fields.

So we have a real-world idea of the concept of an object. In terms of practicality for a computer to pass information about, passing around an object within a program would consume a lot of resources. Think of a car, how many properties that has - 100's, 1000's. A computer passing this information about all the time will waste memory, processing time and therefore a bad idea to use. So objects come in two flavours:

  • Reference types
  • Value types

Reference and Value Types

[edit | edit source]

A reference type is like a pointer to the value. Think of it like a piece of paper with a street address on it, and the address leads to your house - your object with hundreds of properties. If you want to find it, go to where the address says! This is exactly what happens inside the computer. The reference is stored as a number, corresponding to somewhere in memory where the object exists. So instead of moving an object around - like building a replica house every time you want to look at it - you just look at the original.

A value type is the exact value itself. Values are great for storing small amounts of information: numbers, dates etc.

There are differences in the way they are processed, so we will leave that until a little later in the article.

As well as querying values, we need a way to interact with the object so that some operation can be performed. Think of files - it's all well and good knowing the length of the file, but how about Read()'ing it? Therefore, we can use something called methods as a way of performing actions on an object.

An example would be a rectangle. The properties of a rectangle are:

  • Length
  • Width

The "functions" (or methods in .NET) would be:

  • Area (= Length*Width)
  • Perimeter (= 2*Length + 2*Width)

Methods vary from Properties because they require some transformation of data to achieve a result. Methods can either return a result (such as Area) or not. Like above with the chair, if you Sit() on the chair, there is no expected reaction, the chair just ... works!

System.Object

[edit | edit source]

To support the first rule of OOP - Inheritance, we define something that all objects will derive from - this is System.Object, also known as Object or object. This object defines some methods that all objects can use should they need to. These methods include:

  • GetHashCode() - retrieve a number unique to that object.
  • GetType() - retrieves information about the object like method names, the objects name etc.
  • ToString() - convert the object to a textual representation - usually for outputting to the screen or file.

Since all objects derive from this class (whether you define it or not), any class will have these three methods ready to use. Since we always inherit from System.Object, or a class that itself inherits from System.Object, we therefore enhance and/or extend its functionality. Like in the real world that humans, cats, dogs, birds, fish are all an improved and specialised version of an "organism".

Object basics

[edit | edit source]

All objects by default are reference types. To support value types, objects must instead inherit from the System.ValueType abstract class, rather than System.Object.

Constructors

[edit | edit source]

When objects are created, they are initialized by the "constructor". The constructor sets up the object, ready for use. Because objects need to be created before being used, the constructor is created implicitly, unless it is defined differently by the developer. There are 3 types of constructor:

  • Copy Constructor
  • Static Constructor
  • Default constructor - takes no parameters.
  • Overloaded constructor - takes parameters.

Overloaded constructors automatically remove the implicit default constructor, so a developer must explicitly define the default constructor, if they want to use it.

A constructor is a special type of method in C# that allows an object to initialize itself when it is created. If a constructor method is used, there is no need to write a separate method to assign initial values to the data members of an object.

Important characteristics of a constructor method:

  1. A constructor method has the same name as the class itself.
  2. A constructor method is usually declared as public.
  3. Constructor method is declared as public because it is used to create objects from outside the class in which it is declared. We can also declare a constructor method as private, but then such a constructor cannot be used to create objects.
  4. Constructor methods do not have a return type (not even void).
  5. C# provides a default constructor to every class. This default constructor initializes the data members to zero. But if we write our own constructor method, then the default constructor is not used.
  6. A constructor method is used to assign initial values to the member variables.
  7. The constructor is called by the new keyword when an object is created.
  8. We can define more than one constructor in a class. This is known as constructor overloading. All the constructor methods have the same name, but their signatures are different, i.e., number and type of parameters are different.
  9. If a constructor is declared, no default constructor is generated.

Copy Constructor

[edit | edit source]

A copy constructor creates an object by copying variables from another object. The copy constructor is called by creating an object of the required type and passing it the object to be copied.

In the following example, we pass a Rectangle object to the Rectangle constructor so that the new object has the same values as the old object.

using System;

namespace CopyConstructor
{
    class Rectangle
    {
        public int length;
        public int breadth;

        public Rectangle(int x, int y)         // constructor fn
        {
            length = x;
            breadth = y;
        }

        public Rectangle(Rectangle r)
        {
            length = r.length;
            breadth = r.breadth;
        }

        public void display()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Length = " + length);
            Console.WriteLine("Breadth = " + breadth);
        }
    }   // end of class Rectangle

    class Program
    {
        public static void Main()
        {
            Rectangle r1 = new Rectangle(5, 10);
            Console.WriteLine("Values of first object");
            r1.display();

            Rectangle r2 = new Rectangle(r1);
            Console.WriteLine("Values of second object");
            r2.display();

            Console.ReadLine();
        }
    }
}

Static Constructor

[edit | edit source]

A static constructor is first called when the runtime first accesses the class. Static variables are accessible at all times, so the runtime must initialize it on its first access. The example below, when stepping through in a debugger, will show that static MyClass() is only accessed when the MyClass.Number variable is accessed.

C# supports two types of constructors: static constructor and instance constructor. Whereas an instance constructor is called every time an object of that class is created, the static constructor is called only once. A static constructor is called before any object of the class is created, and is usually used to initialize any static data members of a class.

A static constructor is declared by using the keyword static in the constructor definition. This constructor cannot have any parameters or access modifiers. In addition, a class can only have one static constructor. For example:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;

namespace StaticConstructors
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int i = 0;
            int j = 0;
            Console.WriteLine("Static Number = " + MyClass.Number);
        }
    }

    class MyClass
    {
        private static int _number;
        public static int Number { get { return _number; } }
        static MyClass()
        {
            Random r = new Random();
            _number = r.Next();
        }
    }
}

Default Constructor

[edit | edit source]

The default constructor takes no parameters and is implicitly defined, if no other constructors exist. The code sample below show the before, and after result of creating a class.

// Created by the developer
class MyClass
{
}

// Created by the compiler
class MyClass : System.Object
{
     public MyClass() : base()
     {
     }
}

Overloaded Constructors

[edit | edit source]

To initialize objects in various forms, the constructors allow customization of the object by passing in parameters.

 class MyClass
    {
        private int _number;
        public int Number { get { return _number; } }
        
        public MyClass()
        {
            Random randomNumber = new Random();
            _number = randomNumber.Next();
        }
  
        public MyClass(int seed)
        {
            Random randomNumber = new Random(seed);
            _number = randomNumber.Next();
        }
   }

Calling other constructors

[edit | edit source]

To minimise code, if another constructor implements the functionality better, you can instruct the constructor to call an overloaded (or default) constructor with specific parameters.

 class MyClass
    {
        private int _number;
        public int Number { get { return _number; } }
        
        public MyClass() : 
             this ( DateTime.Now.Milliseconds ) // Call the other constructor passing in a value.
        {
            
        }
  
        public MyClass(int seed)
        {
            Random r = new Random(seed);
            _number = r.Next();
        }
   }

Base classes constructors can also be called instead of constructors in the current instance

 class MyException : Exception
    {
        private int _number;
        public int Number { get { return _number; } }
        
        public MyException ( int errorNumber, string message, Exception innerException)
                 : base( message, innerException )
        {
             _number = errorNumber;
        }
   }

Destructors

[edit | edit source]

As well as being "constructed", objects can also perform cleanup when they are cleared up by the garbage collector. As with constructors, the destructor also uses the same name as the class, but is preceded by the tilde (~) sign. However, the garbage collector only runs when either directly invoked, or has reason to reclaim memory, therefore the destructor may not get the chance to clean up resources for a long time. In this case, look into use of the Dispose() method, from the IDisposable interface.

Destructors are recognised via the use of the ~ symbol in front of a constructor with no access modifier. For example:

 class MyException : Exception
    {
        private int _number;
        public int Number { get { return _number; } }
        
        public MyException ( int errorNumber, string message, Exception innerException)
                : base( message, innerException )
        {
             _number = errorNumber;
        }

        ~MyException()
        {
        }
   }



Encapsulation is depriving the user of a class of information the user does not need, and preventing the user from manipulating objects in ways not intended by the designer.

A class element having public protection level is accessible to all code anywhere in the program. These methods and properties represent the operations allowed on the class to outside users.

Methods, data members (and other elements) with private protection level represent the internal state of the class (for variables), and operations that are not allowed to outside users. The private protection level is default for all class and struct members. This means that if you do not specify the protection modifier of a method or variable, it is considered as private by the compiler.

For example:

public class Frog
{
    private int _height = 0;

    // Methods
    public void JumpLow() { Jump(1); }
    public void JumpHigh() { Jump(10); }

    void Jump(int height) { _height += height; }
}

In this example, the public method the Frog class exposes are JumpLow and JumpHigh. Internally, they are implemented using the private Jump function that can jump to any height. This operation is not visible to an outside user, so they cannot make the frog jump 100 meters, only 10 or 1. The Jump private method is implemented by changing the value of a private data member _height, which is also not visible to an outside user. Some private data members are made visible by Properties.

Protection Levels

[edit | edit source]

Private

[edit | edit source]

Private members are only accessible within the class itself. A method in another class, even a class derived from the class with private members cannot access the members. If no protection level is specified, class members will default to private.

namespace PrivateSample
{
    public class Person
    {
        private string _name;

        // Methods
        public Person(string name)
        {
            // Private members can only be modified by the internal methods or constructors of class
            this._name = name; 
        }
    }

    public class Entry
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Person OnePerson = new Person("Samanta");
            //OnePerson._name = "Sam"; // This causes a error of access level
        }
    }
}

Protected

[edit | edit source]

Protected members can be accessed by the class itself and by any class derived from that class.

namespace ProtectedSample
{
    public class Person
    {
        protected string _name;
    }
    /// <summary>
    /// When a class inherits from other class, it can access your protected and public members
    /// above your created members
    /// </summary>
    public class Warrior : Person
    {
        public void SetName(string name)
        {
            // Protected members can be accessed by internal methods or constructors of class
            // so, it can be accessed by inherit class too
            base._name = name;
        }
    }

    public class Entry
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Warrior OnePerson = new Warrior();
            OnePerson.SetName("Glades"); // OK
            // OnePerson._name = "Sam"; // This causes a error of access level too
            // protected members can not be accessed by external scopes
        }
    }
}

Public

[edit | edit source]

Public members can be accessed by any method in any class.

namespace PublicSample
{
    public class Person
    {
        public string Name;
    }

    public class Entry
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Person BeautifulPerson = new Person();
            BeautifulPerson.Name = "Debora"; // OK, public member can be accessed by other scopes
        }
    }
}

It is good programming practice not to expose member variables to the outside, unless it is necessary. This is true especially for fields that should only be accessible over accessor and mutator methods (getters and setters). Exceptions are member variables that are constant.

Internal

[edit | edit source]

Internal members are accessible only in the same assembly and invisible outside it. If no protection level is specified for top level classes, they are treated as internal, and can only be accessed within the assembly.

namespace InternalSample
{
    public class Person
    {
        internal string Name;
    }

    public class Entry
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Person BeautifulPerson = new Person();
            BeautifulPerson.Name = "Debora"; // OK, internal member can be accessed by other 
            // scopes in same assembly supposing that Person is in another assembly, by example a 
            // library, the name cannot be accessed. In another assembly source, this causes an error:
            // BeautifulPerson.Name = "Debora"; // Cannot access internal member
        }
    }
}

Protected Internal

[edit | edit source]

Protected internal members are accessible from any class derived from that class, or any class within the same assembly. So, it means protected or internal.[1]

Here, an example:

namespace InternalSample
{
    public class Person
    {
        protected internal string Name;
    }

    public class Entry
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Person BeautifulPerson = new Person();
            BeautifulPerson.Name = "Debora"; // As above...
        }
    }
}

public class Book : InternalSample.Person
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        InternalSample.Person BeautifulPerson = new InternalSample.Person();
        string aName = BeautifulPerson.Name; // Can be accessed, as Book is derived from Person
    }
}

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. Joe Mayo (2007-04-27). "Type Member Access Modifiers". http://www.csharp-station.com/: C# STATION. Retrieved 2011-08-12. Either code from derived type or code in the same assembly. Combination of protected OR internal. {{cite web}}: External link in |location= (help)

Advanced Concepts

[edit | edit source]

Explanation By Analogy

[edit | edit source]

What is the benefit of inheritance?

  1. It saves you a lot of typing
  2. It saves you from repeating yourself.

Inheritance explained by analogy

Suppose you want to create an Eagle, a Falcon and a vulture. In order to create these flying creatures you notice that each of these creatures:

  1. Fly
  2. Breed
  3. Eat

Let us assume for the sake of argument that all three types of birds: fly, breed and eat in exactly the same way.

Without inheritance, you would be forced to copy code. i.e. the same code which causes an eagle to fly would also be copied to make the vulture fly. And it is axiomatic to programmers - who are a lazy bunch, not wanting to repeat themselves - that repetition is almost always a bad thing.

Note the eagle, falcon and vultures are all in fact birds. Accordingly, you could say that a bird, generally speaking, always has the characteristics of eating, breeding and flying. So using "inheritance" you could create generic 'bird' prototype, which eats, breeds and flies, and then once that is defined, you can have all other specific breeds of birds inherit those characteristics. In other words, using the prototype, you can design other specific birds off that prototyped design.

This means that the falcon automatically knows how to fly because it inherits that behaviour from the general Bird class. You basically don't have to repeat yourself.

Inheritance

[edit | edit source]

Inheritance is the ability to create a class from another class, the "parent" class, extending the functionality and state of the parent in the derived, or "child" class. It allows derived classes to overload methods from their parent class.

Inheritance is one of the pillars of object-orientation. It is the mechanism of designing one class from another and is one of the ideas for code reusability, supporting the concept of hierarchical classification. C# programs consist of classes, where new classes can either be created from scratch or by using some or all properties of an existing class.

Another feature related to inheritance and reusability of code is polymorphism, which permits the same method name to be used for different operations on different data types. Thus, C# supports code reusability by both features.

Important characteristics of inheritance include:

  1. A derived class extends its base class. That is, it contains the methods and data of its parent class, and it can also contain its own data members and methods.
  2. The derived class cannot change the definition of an inherited member.
  3. Constructors and destructors are not inherited. All other members of the base class are inherited.
  4. The accessibility of a member in the derived class depends upon its declared accessibility in the base class.
  5. A derived class can override an inherited member.

An example of inheritance:

using System;
using System.Text;

namespace ContainmentInheritance
{
    class Room
    {
        public int length;
        public int width;
        public int height;

        public Room(int l, int w, int h)
        {
            length = l;
            width = w;
            height = h;
        }
    }

    class Home
    {
        int numberOfRooms;
        int plotSize;
        string locality;
        string name;

        // create an object of class Room inside class Home
        Room studyRoom = new Room(10, 12, 12);

        public Home()
        {
            numberOfRooms = 1;
            plotSize = 1000;
            locality = "Versova";
            name = "study room";
        }

        public void Display()
        {
            Console.WriteLine("MyHome has {0} rooms", numberOfRooms);
            Console.WriteLine("Plot size is {0}", plotSize);
            Console.WriteLine("Locality is {0}", locality);

            int area = studyRoom.length*studyRoom.width;
            Console.WriteLine("Area of the {0} room is {1}", name, area);
        }
    }
    
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Home myhome = new Home();
            myhome.Display();

            Console.ReadLine();
        }
    }
}

Subtyping Inheritance

[edit | edit source]

The code sample below shows two classes, Employee and Executive. Employee has the methods GetPayCheck and Work.

We want the Executive class to have the same methods, but differently implemented and one extra method, AdministerEmployee.

Below is the creation of the first class to be derived from.

public class Employee
{
    // We declare one method virtual so that the Executive class can
    // override it.
    public virtual void GetPayCheck()
    {
        // Get paycheck logic here.
    }

    //Employee's and Executives both work, so no virtual here needed.
    public void Work()
    {
        // Do work logic here.
    }
}

Now, we create an Executive class that will override the GetPayCheck method:

public class Executive : Employee
{
    // The override keyword indicates we want new logic behind the GetPayCheck method.
    public override void GetPayCheck()
    {
        // New getpaycheck logic here.
    }

    // The extra method is implemented.
    public void AdministerEmployee()
    {
        // Manage employee logic here
    }
}

You'll notice that there is no Work method in the Executive class, as it is inherited from Employee.

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    Employee emp = new Employee();
    Executive exec = new Executive();

    emp.Work();
    exec.Work();
    emp.GetPayCheck();
    exec.GetPayCheck();
    exec.AdministerEmployee();
}

Virtual Methods

[edit | edit source]

If a base class contains a virtual method that it calls elsewhere and a derived class overrides that virtual method, the base class will actually call the derived class' method:

public class Resource : IDisposable
{
    private bool _isClosed = false;    // good programming practice initialise, although default
    
    protected virtual void Close()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Base resource closer called!");
    }
    
    ~Resource()
    {
        Dispose();
    }
    
    public void Dispose()
    {
        if (!_isClosed)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Disposing resource and calling the Close() method...");
            _isClosed = true;
            Close();
        }
    }
}

public class AnotherTypeOfResource : Resource
{
    protected override void Close()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Another type of resource closer called!");
    }
}

public class VirtualMethodDemo
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Resource res = new Resource();
        AnotherTypeOfResource res2 = new AnotherTypeOfResource();
        
        res.Dispose();  // Resource.Close() will be called.
        res2.Dispose(); // Even though Dispose() is part of the Resource class, 
                        // the Resource class will call AnotherTypeOfResource.Close()!
    }
}

Constructors

[edit | edit source]

A derived class does not automatically inherit the base class' constructors, and it cannot be instantiated unless it provides its own. A derived class must call one of its base class' constructors by using the base keyword:

public class MyBaseClass
{
    public MyBaseClass(string text)
    {
        console.WriteLine(text);
    }
}

public class MyDerivedClass : MyBaseClass
{
    public MyDerivedClass(int number)
        : base(number.ToString())
    { }
    
    public MyDerivedClass(string text) // even though this is exactly the same as MyBaseClass'  
    // only constructor, this is still necessary as constructors are not inherited.
        : base(text)
    { }
}

Inheritance keywords

[edit | edit source]

The way C# inherits from another class syntactically is by using the : operator.

Example:

public class Executive : Employee

To indicate a method that can be overridden, you mark the method with virtual.

public virtual void Write(string text)
{
    System.Console.WriteLine("Text:{0}", text);
}

To override a method, use the override keyword:

public override void Write(string  text)
{
    System.Console.WriteLine(text);
}

A missing new or override keyword for a derived method may result in errors or warnings during compilation.:[1] Here an example:

abstract class ShapesA
{
    abstract public int Area(); // abstract!
}

class Square : ShapesA
{
    int x, y;

    public int Area() // Error: missing 'override' or 'new'
    {
        return x * y;
    }
} 

class Shapes
{
    virtual public int Area() { return 0; } // it is virtual now!
}

class Square : Shapes
{
    int x, y;

    public int Area() // no explicit 'override' or 'new' required
    { return x * y; }
}

The Square class method Area() will result in a compilation error, if it is derived from the ShapesA class:

error CS0534: 'ConsoleApplication3.Square' does not implement inherited abstract member
'ConsoleApplication3.Shapes.Area()'

The same method will result in a compilation warning, if derived from the normal Shapes class:

warning CS0114: 'ConsoleApplication3.Square.Area()' hides inherited member 'ConsoleApplication3.Shapes.Area()'.
To make the current member override that implementation, add the override keyword. Otherwise add the new
keyword.

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. Greg Beech (2010-03-09). "C# design: Why is new/override required on abstract methods but not on virtual methods? / Answer". http://efreedom.com/: eFreedom. Retrieved 2011-08-11. Using either the C# 3.0 compiler as shipped in .NET 3.5 SP1, or the C# 4.0 compiler as shipped in .NET 4.0, I get the following error for your first example: [...] And the following warning for the second one: [...] In the first case it's an error because you aren't actually overriding the base method, which means there is no implementation for the abstract method in a concrete class. In the second case it's a warning because the code is technically correct, but the compiler suspects that it isn't what you meant. This is one of the reasons it's generally a good idea to enable the "treat warnings as errors" compilation setting. {{cite web}}: External link in |location= (help)



An INTERFACE in C# is a type definition similar to a class, except that it purely represents a contract between an object and its user. It can neither be directly instantiated as an object, nor can data members be defined. So, an interface is nothing but a collection of method and property declarations. The following defines a simple interface:

interface IShape
{
    double X { get; set; }
    double Y { get; set; }
    void Draw();
}

A CONVENTION used in the .NET Framework (and likewise by many C# programmers) is to place an "I" at the beginning of an interface name to distinguish it from a class name. Another common interface naming convention is used when an interface declares only one key method, such as Draw() in the above example. The interface name is then formed as an adjective by adding the "...able" suffix. So, the interface name above could also be IDrawable. This convention is used throughout the .NET Framework.

Implementing an interface is simply done by inheriting off it and defining all the methods and properties declared by the interface after that. For instance,

class Square : IShape
{
    private double _mX, _mY;

    public void Draw() { ... }

    public double X 
    { 
        set { _mX = value; }
        get { return _mX; }  
    }

    public double Y 
    {
        set { _mY = value; }
        get { return _mY; }
    }
}

Although a class can inherit from one class only, it can inherit from any number of interfaces. This is a simplified form of multiple inheritance supported by C#. When inheriting from a class and one or more interfaces, the base class should be provided first in the inheritance list, followed by any interfaces to be implemented. For example:

class MyClass : Class1, Interface1, Interface2 { ... }

Object references can be declared using an interface type. For instance, using the previous examples,

class MyClass 
{
    static void Main()
    {
        IShape shape = new Square();
        shape.Draw();
    }
}

Interfaces can inherit off of any number of other interfaces, but cannot inherit from classes. For example:

interface IRotateable
{
    void Rotate(double theta);
}

interface IDrawable : IRotateable
{
    void Draw();
}

Additional details

[edit | edit source]

Access specifiers (i.e. private, internal, etc.) cannot be provided for interface members, as all members are public by default. A class implementing an interface must define all the members declared by the interface. The implementing class has the option of making an implemented method virtual, if it is expected to be overridden in a child class.

There are no static methods within an interface, but any static methods can be implemented in a class that manages objects using it.

In addition to methods and properties, interfaces can declare events and indexers as well.

For those familiar with Java, C#'s interfaces are extremely similar to Java's.

Introduction

[edit | edit source]

Delegates and events are fundamental to any Windows or Web Application, allowing the developer to "subscribe" to particular actions carried out by the user. Therefore, instead of expecting everything and filtering out what you want, you choose what you want to be notified of and react to that action.

A delegate is a way of telling C# which method to call when an event is triggered. For example, if you click a Button on a form, the program would call a specific method. It is this pointer that is a delegate. Delegates are good, as you can notify several methods that an event has occurred, if you wish so.

An event is a notification by the .NET framework that an action has occurred. Each event contains information about the specific event, e.g., a mouse click would say which mouse button was clicked where on the form.

Let's say you write a program reacting only to a Button click. Here is the sequence of events that occurs:

  • User presses the mouse button down over a button
    • The .NET framework raises a MouseDown event
  • User releases the mouse button
    • The .NET framework raises a MouseUp event
    • The .NET framework raises a MouseClick event
    • The .NET framework raises a Clicked event on the Button

Since the button's click event has been subscribed, the rest of the events are ignored by the program and your delegate tells the .NET framework which method to call, now that the event has been raised.

Delegates

[edit | edit source]

Delegates form the basis of event handling in C#. They are a construct for abstracting and creating objects that reference methods and can be used to call those methods. A delegate declaration specifies a particular method signature. References to one or more methods can be added to a delegate instance. The delegate instance can then be "called", which effectively calls all the methods that have been added to the delegate instance. A simple example:

using System;
delegate void Procedure();

class DelegateDemo
{
    public static void Method1()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Method 1");
    }

    public static void Method2()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Method 2");
    }

    public void Method3()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Method 3");
    }

    static void Main()
    {
        Procedure someProcs = null;

        someProcs += new Procedure(DelegateDemo.Method1);
        someProcs += new Procedure(Method2);  // Example with omitted class name

        DelegateDemo demo = new DelegateDemo();

        someProcs += new Procedure(demo.Method3);
        someProcs();
    }
}

In this example, the delegate is declared by the line delegate voidProcedure(). This statement is a complete abstraction. It does not result in executable code that does any work, but merely declares a delegate type called Procedure that takes no arguments and returns nothing. Next, in the Main() method, the statement Procedure someProcs = null; instantiates a delegate. The assignment means that the delegate is not initially referencing any methods. The statements someProcs += newProcedure(DelegateDemo.Method1) and someProcs += newProcedure(Method2) add two static methods to the delegate instance. Note that the class name can also be left off, as the statement is occurring inside DelegateDemo. The statement someProcs += newProcedure(demo.Method3) adds a non-static method to the delegate instance. For a non-static method, the method name is preceded by an object reference. When the delegate instance is called, Method3() is called on the object that was supplied when the method was added to the delegate instance. Finally, the statement someProcs() calls the delegate instance. All the methods that were added to the delegate instance are now called in the order that they were added.

Methods that have been added to a delegate instance can be removed with the -= operator:

someProcs -= new Procedure(DelegateDemo.Method1);

In C# 2.0, adding or removing a method reference to a delegate instance can be shortened as follows:

someProcs += DelegateDemo.Method1;
someProcs -= DelegateDemo.Method1;

Invoking a delegate instance that presently contains no method references results in a NullReferenceException.

Note that, if a delegate declaration specifies a return type and multiple methods are added to a delegate instance, an invocation of the delegate instance returns the return value of the last method referenced. The return values of the other methods cannot be retrieved (unless explicitly stored somewhere in addition to being returned).

Anonymous delegates

[edit | edit source]

Anonymous delegates are a short way to write delegate code, specified using the delegate keyword. The delegate code can also reference local variables of the function in which they are declared. Anonymous delegates are automatically converted into methods by the compiler. For example:

using System;
delegate void Procedure();

class DelegateDemo2
{
    static Procedure someProcs = null;

    private static void AddProc()
    {
        int variable = 100;
 
        someProcs += new Procedure(delegate
            {
                Console.WriteLine(variable);
            });
    }

    static void Main()
    {
        someProcs += new Procedure(delegate { Console.WriteLine("test"); });
        AddProc();
        someProcs();
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

They can accept arguments just as normal methods can:

using System;
delegate void Procedure(string text);

class DelegateDemo3
{
    static Procedure someProcs = null;
    
    private static void AddProc()
    {
        int variable = 100;
 
        someProcs += new Procedure(delegate(string text)
            {
                Console.WriteLine(text + ", " + variable.ToString());
            });
    }
    
    static void Main()
    {
        someProcs += new Procedure(delegate(string text) { Console.WriteLine(text); });
        AddProc();
        someProcs("testing");
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

The output is:

testing
testing, 100

Lambda expressions

[edit | edit source]

Lambda expressions are a clearer way to achieve the same thing as an anonymous delegate. Its form is:

(type1 arg1, type2 arg2, ...) => expression

This is equivalent to:

delegate(type1 arg1, type2 arg2, ...)
{
    return expression;
}

If there is only one argument, the parentheses can be omitted. The type names can also be omitted to let the compiler infer the types from the context. In the following example, str is a string, and the return type is an int:

Func<string, int> myFunc = str => int.Parse(str);

This is equivalent to:

Func<string, int> myFunc = delegate(string str)
{
    return int.Parse(str);
};

Events

[edit | edit source]

An event is a special kind of delegate that facilitates event-driven programming. Events are class members that cannot be called outside of the class regardless of its access specifier. So, for example, an event declared to be public would allow other classes the use of += and -= on the event, but firing the event (i.e. invoking the delegate) is only allowed in the class containing the event. A simple example:

public delegate void ButtonClickedHandler();
class Button
{
    public event ButtonClickedHandler ButtonClicked;
    ButtonClicked += ()=>{Console.WriteLine("click simulation !");};    
    public void SimulateClick()
    {
        if (ButtonClicked != null)
        {
            ButtonClicked();
        }
    }
    ...
}

A method in another class can then subscribe to the event by adding one of its methods to the event delegate:

Button b = new Button();
b.ButtonClicked += ButtonClickHandler;

private void ButtonClickHandler()
{
    //Handle the event
}

Even though the event is declared public, it cannot be directly fired anywhere except in the class containing it.


In general terms, an interface is the set of public members of a component. Of course, this is also true for C# interface. A C# class also defines an interface, as it has a set of public members. A non-abstract C# class defines the implementation of each member.

In C#, it is possible to have a type that is intermediate between a pure interface that does not define any implementation, and a type that defines a complete implementation. This is called an abstract class and is defined by including the abstract keyword in the class definition.

An abstract class is somewhere between a C# interface and a non-abstract class. Of the public members defined by an abstract class, any number of those members may include an implementation.

For example, an abstract class might provide an implementation for none of its members.

public abstract class AbstractShape
{
    public abstract void Draw(Graphics g);
    public abstract double X {get; set;}
    public abstract double Y {get; set;}
}

This class is equivalent to an interface in many respects. (One difference is that a class that derives from this class cannot derive from any other class.)

An abstract class may also define all of its members.

public abstract class AbstractShape
{
    private double _x;
    private double _y;
    //
    // ... (other members)
    //
    public void Draw(Graphics g) {g.DrawRectangle(Pens.Black, g_rect);}
    public double X {get{return _x;}}
    public double Y {get{return _y;}}
}

And an abstract class may define some of its members, but leave others undefined.

public abstract class AbstractShape
{
    private double _x;
    private double _y;
    //
    // ... (other members)
    //
    public abstract void Draw(Graphics g);
    public double X {get{return _x;}}
    public double Y {get{return _y;}}
}

Although an abstract class is similar to a non-abstract class, some important differences exist. For one thing, you cannot create an instance of an abstract class with the new keyword. For example, the following statement will raise a compiler error:

AbstractShape shape = new AbstractShape();

Of course, assuming the concrete class Square derives from AbstractShape, the following would be correct:

AbstractShape shape = new Square();

A second difference is that an abstract class may have abstract members. As was shown above, this is not a must. To create a class with at least one abstract member, the abstract keyword must be added before the class keyword.

The third difference is that a class cannot be both abstract and sealed.

Implementing methods

[edit | edit source]

As with virtual methods, you can implement abstract methods or properties with the override keyword:

public class Rectangle : AbstractShape
{
    private double _x;
    private double _y;
    // ...
    public override void Draw(Graphics g)
    {
        g.DrawRectangle(Pens.Black, g_rect);
    }

    public override double X {
        get { return _x; }
        set { _x = value; }
    }

    public override double Y {
        get { return _y; }
        set { _y = value; }
    }
}

Overriding an abstract method is effectively the same as overriding a virtual method - you cannot change the access specifiers (i.e. you can't convert a protected abstract method into public), and you cannot add a missing get or set to an abstract property. The only difference is that "forgetting" the new or override keyword results in an error, if the class this method is belonging to was derived from an abstract class, and it will result in a warning, if the class tries to override a virtual method.

Partial Classes

[edit | edit source]

As the name indicates, partial class definitions can be split up across multiple physical files. To the compiler, this does not make a difference, as all the fragments of the partial class are grouped and the compiler treats it as a single class. One common usage of partial classes is the separation of automatically-generated code from programmer-written code.

Below is an example of a partial class.

Listing 1: Entire class definition in one file (file1.cs)

public class Node
{
    public bool Delete()
    {
    }

    public bool Create()
    {
    }
}

Listing 2: Class split across multiple files

(file1.cs)

public partial class Node
{
    public bool Delete()
    {
    }
}

(file2.cs)

public partial class Node
{
    public bool Create()
    {
    }
}

Generics are a new feature available since version 2.0 of the C# language and the common language runtime (CLR). Generics introduce to the .NET Framework the concept of type parameters, which make it possible to design classes and methods that defer the specification of one or more types until the class or method is declared and instantiated by client code. The most common use of generics is to create collection classes. Generic types were introduced to maximize code reuse, maximizing type safety, and performance.[1]

Generic classes

[edit | edit source]

There are cases when you need to create a class to manage objects of some type, without modifying them. Without generics, the usual approach (highly simplified) to make such class would be like this:

public class SomeObjectContainer
{
    private object _obj;

    public SomeObjectContainer(object obj)
    {
        this._obj = obj;
    }

    public object GetObject()
    {
        return this._obj;
    }
}

And its usage would be:

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        SomeObjectContainer container = new SomeObjectContainer(25);
        SomeObjectContainer container2 = new SomeObjectContainer(5);

        Console.WriteLine((int) container.GetObject() + (int) container2.GetObject());
        Console.ReadKey(); // wait for user to press any key, so we could see results
    }
}

Note that we have to cast back to original data type we have chosen (in this case - int) every time we want to get an object from such a container. In such small programs like this, everything is clear. But in more complicated cases with more containers in different parts of the program, we would have to take care that the container is supposed to have int type in it and no other data type, as in such a case, a InvalidCastException is thrown.

Additionally, if the original data type we have chosen is a value type, such as int, we will incur a performance penalty every time we access the elements of the collection due to the autoboxing feature of C#.

However, we could surround every unsafe area with a try - catch block, or we could create a separate "container" for every data type we need just to avoid casting. While both ways could work (and worked for many years), it is unnecessary now, because generics offers a much more elegant solution.

To make our "container" class to support any object and avoid casting, we replace every previous object type with some new name, in this case T, and add <T> mark immediately after the class name to indicate that this T type is generic/any type.

Note: You can choose any name and use more than one generic type for class, i.e <genKey, genVal>.
public class GenericObjectContainer<T>
{
    private T _obj;

    public GenericObjectContainer(T obj)
    {
        this._obj = obj;
    }

    public T getObject()
    {
        return this._obj;
    }
}

Not a big difference, which results in simple and safe usage:

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        GenericObjectContainer<int> container = new GenericObjectContainer<int>(25);
        GenericObjectContainer<int> container2 = new GenericObjectContainer<int>(5);
        Console.WriteLine(container.getObject() + container2.getObject());

        Console.ReadKey(); // wait for user to press any key, so we could see results
    }
}

Generics ensures that you specify the type for a "container" once, avoiding previously mentioned problems and autoboxing for structs.

While this example is far from practical, it does illustrate some situations where generics are useful:

  • You need to keep objects of a single type in a class
  • You do not need to modify objects
  • You need to manipulate objects in some way
  • You wish to store a "value type" (such as int, short, string, or any custom struct) in a collection class without incurring the performance penalty of autoboxing every time you manipulate the stored elements.

Generic interfaces

[edit | edit source]

A generic interface accepts one or more type parameters, similar to a generic class:

public interface IContainer<T>
{
    T GetObject();
    void SetObject(T value);
}

public class StringContainer : IContainer<string>
{
    private string _str;
    
    public string GetObject()
    {
        return _str;
    }
    
    public void SetObject(string value)
    {
        _str = value;
    }
}

public class FileWithString : IContainer<string>
{
    ...
}

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        IContainer<string> container = new StringContainer();
        
        container.SetObject("test");

        Console.WriteLine(container.GetObject());
        container = new FileWithString();

        container.SetObject("another test");

        Console.WriteLine(container.GetObject());
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

Generic interfaces are useful when multiple implementations of a particular class are possible. For example, both the List<T> class (discussed below) and the LinkedList<T> class, both from the System.Collections.Generic namespace, implement the IEnumerable<T> interface. List<T> has a constructor that creates a new list based on an existing object that implements IEnumerable<T>, and so we can write the following:

LinkedList<int> linkedList = new LinkedList<int>();

linkedList.AddLast(1);
linkedList.AddLast(2);
linkedList.AddLast(3);
// linkedList now contains 1, 2 and 3.

List<int> list = new List<int>(linkedList);

// now list contains 1, 2 and 3 as well!

Generic methods

[edit | edit source]

Generic methods are very similar to generic classes and interfaces:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

public static bool ArrayContains<T>(T[] array, T element)
{
    foreach (T e in array)
    {
        if (e.Equals(element))
        {
            return true;
        }
    }

    return false;
}

This method can be used to search any type of array:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        string[] strArray = { "string one", "string two", "string three" };
        int[] intArray = { 123, 456, 789 };
        
        Console.WriteLine(ArrayContains<string>(strArray, "string one")); // True
        Console.WriteLine(ArrayContains<int>(intArray, 135)); // False
    }
}

Type constraints

[edit | edit source]

One may specify one or more type constraints in any generic class, interface or method using the where keyword. The following example shows all of the possible type constraints:

public class MyClass<T, U, V, W>
    where T : class,        // T should be a reference type (array, class, delegate, interface)
        new()               // T should have a public constructor with no parameters
    where U : struct        // U should be a value type (byte, double, float, int, long, struct, uint, etc.)
    where V : MyOtherClass, // V should be derived from MyOtherClass
        IEnumerable<U>      // V should implement IEnumerable<U>
    where W : T,            // W should be derived from T
        IDisposable         // W should implement IDisposable
{
    ...
}

These type constraints are often necessary to

  1. create a new instance of a generic type (the new()) constraint
  2. use foreach on a variable of a generic type (the IEnumerable<T> constraint)
  3. use using on a variable of a generic type (the IDisposable constraint)

Notes

[edit | edit source]
  1. "Generics (C# Programming Guide)". http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/: msdn. Retrieved 2011-08-09. {{cite web}}: External link in |location= (help)


Extension methods are a feature new to C# 3.0 and allow you to extend existing types with your own methods. While they are static, they are used as if they are normal methods of the class being extended. Thus, new functionality can be added to an existing class without a need to change or recompile the class itself. However, since they are not directly part of the class, extensions cannot access private or protected methods, properties, or fields.

Extension methods should be created inside a static class. They themselves should be static and should contain at least one parameter, the first preceded by the this keyword:

public static class MyExtensions
{
    public static string[] ToStringArray<T>(this List<T> list)
    {
        string[] array = new string[list.Count];

        for (int i = 0; i < list.Count; i++)
            array[i] = list[i].ToString();

        return array;
    }

    // to be continued...
}

The type of the first parameter (in this case List<T>) specifies the type with which the extension method will be available. You can now call the extension method like this:

List<int> list = new List<int>();

list.Add(1);
list.Add(2);
list.Add(3);

string[] strArray = list.ToStringArray(); // strArray will now contain "1", "2" and "3".

Here is the rest of the program:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

public static class MyExtensions
{
    ... // continued from above

    public static void WriteToConsole(this string str)
    {
        Console.WriteLine(str);
    }

    public static string Repeat(this string str, int times)
    {
        System.Text.StringBuilder sb = new System.Text.StringBuilder();

        for (int i = 0; i < times; i++)
            sb.Append(str);

        return sb.ToString();
    }
}

class ExtensionMethodsDemo
{
    static void Main()
    {
        List<int> myList = new List<int>();
        
        for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++)
            myList.Add(i);
        
        string[] myStringArray = myList.ToStringArray();
        
        foreach (string s in myStringArray)
            s.Repeat(4).WriteToConsole(); // string is extended by WriteToConsole()
        
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

Note that extension methods can take parameters simply by defining more than one parameter without the this keyword.

Introduction

[edit | edit source]

All computer programs use up memory, whether that is a variable in memory, opening a file or connecting to a database. The question is how can the runtime environment reclaim any memory when it is not being used? There are three answers to this question:

  • If you are using a managed resource, this is automatically released by the Garbage Collector
  • If you are using an unmanaged resource, you must use the IDisposable interface to assist with the cleanup
  • If you are calling the Garbage Collector directly, by using System.GC.Collect() method, it will be forced to tidy up resources immediately.

Before discussing managed and unmanaged resources, it would be interesting to know what the garbage collector actually does.

Garbage Collector

[edit | edit source]

The garbage collector is a background process running within your program. It is always present within all .NET applications. Its job is to look for objects (i.e. reference types) which are no longer being used by your program. If the object is assigned to null, or the object goes out of scope, the garbage collector will mark the object be cleaned up at some point in the future, and not necessarily have its resources released immediately!

Why? The garbage collector will have a hard time keeping up with every de-allocation you make, especially at the speed the program runs and therefore only runs when resources become limited. Therefore, the garbage collector has three "generations".

  • Generation 0 - the most recently created objects
  • Generation 1 - the mid-life objects
  • Generation 2 - the long term objects.

All reference types will exist in one of these three generations. They will firstly be allocated to Gen 0, then moved to Gen 1 and Gen 2 depending on their lifetime. The garbage collector works by removing only what is needed and so will only scan Gen 0 for a quick-fix solution. This is because most, if not all, local variables are placed in this area.

For more in-depth information, visit the MSDN Article for a better explanation.

Now you know about the garbage collector, let's discuss the resources that it is managing.

Managed Resources

[edit | edit source]

Managed resources are objects which run totally within the .NET framework. All memory is reclaimed for you automatically, all resources closed and you are in most cases guaranteed to have all the memory released after the application closes, or when the garbage collector runs.

You do not have to do anything with them with regards to closing connections or anything, it is a self-tidying object.

Unmanaged Resources

[edit | edit source]

There are circumstances where the .NET framework world will not release resources. This may be because the object references resources outside of the .NET framework, like the operating system, or internally references another unmanaged component, or that the resources accesses a component that uses COM, COM+ or DCOM.

Whatever the reason, if you are using an object that implements the IDisposable interface at a class level, then you too need to implement the IDisposable interface too.

public interface IDisposable
{
     void Dispose();
}

This interface exposes a method called Dispose(). This alone will not help tidy up resources, as it is only an interface, so the developer must use it correctly in order to ensure the resources are released. The two steps are:

  1. Always call Dispose() on any object that implements IDisposable as soon as you are finished using it. (This can be made easier with the using keyword)
  2. Use the finalizer method to call Dispose(), so that if anyone has not closed your resources, your code will do it for them.

Dispose pattern

[edit | edit source]

Often, what you want to clean up varies depending on whether your object is being finalized. For example, you would not want to clean up managed resources in a finalizer since the managed resources could have been reclaimed by the garbage collector already. The dispose pattern can help you implement resource management properly in this situation:

public class MyResource : IDisposable
{
    private IntPtr _someUnmanagedResource;
    private List<long> _someManagedResource = new List<long>();
    
    public MyResource()
    {
        _someUnmanagedResource = AllocateSomeMemory();
        
        for (long i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
            _someManagedResource.Add(i);
        ...
    }
    
    // The finalizer will call the internal dispose method, telling it not to free managed resources.
    ~MyResource()
    {
        this.Dispose(false);
    }
    
    // The internal dispose method.
    private void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if (disposing)
        {
            // Clean up managed resources
            _someManagedResource.Clear();
        }
        
        // Clean up unmanaged resources
        FreeSomeMemory(_someUnmanagedResource);
    }
    
    // The public dispose method will call the internal dispose method, telling it to free managed resources.
    public void Dispose()
    {
        this.Dispose(true);
        // Tell the garbage collector to not call the finalizer because we have already freed resources.
        GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
    }
}

Applications

[edit | edit source]

If you are coming to C# from Visual Basic Classic you will have seen code like this:

Public Function Read(ByRef FileName) As String
  
    Dim oFSO As FileSystemObject
    Set oFSO = New FileSystemObject
  
    Dim oFile As TextStream
    Set oFile = oFSO.OpenTextFile(FileName, ForReading, False)
    Read = oFile.ReadLine
    
End Function

Note that neither oFSO nor oFile are explicitly disposed of. In Visual Basic Classic this is not necessary because both objects are declared locally. This means that the reference count goes to zero as soon as the function ends which results in calls to the Terminate event handlers of both objects. Those event handlers close the file and release the associated resources.

In C# this doesn't happen because the objects are not reference counted. The finalizers will not be called until the garbage collector decides to dispose of the objects. If the program uses very little memory this could be a long time.

This causes a problem because the file is held open which might prevent other processes from accessing it.

In many languages the solution is to explicitly close the file and dispose of the objects and many C# programmers do just that. However, there is a better way: use the using statement:

public read(string fileName)
{
    using (TextReader textReader = new StreamReader(filename))
    {
        return textReader.ReadLine();
    }
}

Behind the scenes the compiler turns the using statement into try ... finally and produces this intermediate language (IL) code:

.method public hidebysig static string  Read(string FileName) cil managed
{
    // Code size       39 (0x27)
    .maxstack  5
    .locals init (class [mscorlib]System.IO.TextReader V_0, string V_1)
    IL_0000:  ldarg.0
    IL_0001:  newobj     instance void [mscorlib]System.IO.StreamReader::.ctor(string)
    IL_0006:  stloc.0
    .try
    {
        IL_0007:  ldloc.0
        IL_0008:  callvirt   instance string [mscorlib]System.IO.TextReader::ReadLine()
        IL_000d:  stloc.1
        IL_000e:  leave      IL_0025
        IL_0013:  leave      IL_0025
    }  // end .try
    finally
    {
        IL_0018:  ldloc.0
        IL_0019:  brfalse    IL_0024
        IL_001e:  ldloc.0
        IL_001f:  callvirt   instance void [mscorlib]System.IDisposable::Dispose()
        IL_0024:  endfinally
    }  // end handler
    IL_0025:  ldloc.1
    IL_0026:  ret
} // end of method Using::Read

Notice that the body of the Read function has been split into three parts: initialisation, try, and finally. The finally block includes code that was never explicitly specified in the original C# source code, namely a call to the destructor of the Streamreader instance.

See Understanding the 'using' statement in C# By TiNgZ aBrAhAm.

See the following sections for more applications of this technique.

Resource Acquisition Is Initialisation

[edit | edit source]

The application of the using statement in the introduction is an example of an idiom called Resource Acquisition Is Initialisation (RAII).

RAII is a natural technique in languages like Visual Basic Classic and C++ that have deterministic finalization, but usually requires extra work to include in programs written in garbage collected languages like C# and VB.NET. The using statement makes it just as easy. Of course you could write the try..finally code out explicitly and in some cases that will still be necessary. For a thorough discussion of the RAII technique see HackCraft: The RAII Programming Idiom. Wikipedia has a brief note on the subject as well: Resource Acquisition Is Initialization.

Work in progress: add C# versions showing incorrect and correct methods with and without using. Add notes on RAII, memoization and cacheting (see OOP wikibook).

Design Patterns are common building blocks designed to solve everyday software issues. Some basic terms and example of such patterns include what we see in everyday life. The design patterns are broadly classified into 3 types:

1. Creational: These patterns are designed for class instantiation. They can be either class-creation patterns or object-creational patterns.

2. Structural: These patterns are designed with regard to a class's structure and composition. The main goal of most of these patterns is to increase the functionality of the class(es) involved, without changing much of its composition.

3. Behavioral: These patterns are designed depending on how one class communicates with others.


Factory Pattern

[edit | edit source]

The factory pattern is a method call that uses abstract classes and its implementations, to give the developer the most appropriate class for the job.

Lets create a couple of classes first to demonstrate how this can be used. Here we take the example of a bank system.

public abstract class Transaction
{
     private string _sourceAccount;

     // May not be needed in most cases, but may on transfers, closures and corrections.
     private string _destinationAccount;
   
     private decimal _amount;
     public decimal Amount { get { return _amount; } }
   
     private DateTime _transactionDate;
     private DateTime _effectiveDate;

     public Transaction(string source, string destination, decimal amount)
     {
          _sourceAccount = source;
          _destinationAccount = destination;
          _amount = amount;
          _transactionDate = DateTime.Now;
     }

     public Transaction(string source, string destination, decimal amount, DateTime effectiveDate) : this(source, destination, amount)
     {
          _effectiveDate = effectiveDate;
     }

     protected decimal AdjustBalance(string accountNumber, decimal amount)
     {
          decimal newBalance = decimal.MinValue;

          using(Mainframe.ICOMInterface mf = new Mainframe.COMInterfaceClass())
          {
               string dateFormat = DateTime.Now.ToString("yyyyMMdd HH:mm:ss");
               mf.Credit(dateFormat, accountNumber, amount);
               newBalance = mf.GetBalance( DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(1), accountNumber);
          }
          
          return newBalance;
     }
     
     public abstract bool Complete();
}

This Transaction class is incomplete, as there are many types of transactions:

  • Opening
  • Credits
  • Withdrawals
  • Transfers
  • Penalty
  • Correction
  • Closure

For this example, we will take credit and withdrawal portions, and create classes for them.

public class Credit : Transaction
{
     // Implementations hidden for simplicity

     public override bool Complete()
     {
          this.AdjustBalance( _sourceAccount, amount);
     }
}

public class Withdrawal : Transaction
{
     // Implementations hidden for simplicity

     public override bool Complete()
     {
          this.AdjustBalance( _sourceAccount, -amount);
     }
}

The problem is that these classes do much of the same thing, so it would be helpful, if we could just give it the values, and it will work out what class type we require. Therefore, we could come up with some ways to distinguish between the different types of transactions:

  • Positive values indicate a credit.
  • Negative values indicate a withdrawal.
  • Having two account numbers and a positive value would indicate a transfer.
  • Having two account numbers and a negative value would indicate a closure.
  • etc.

So, let us write a new class with a static method that will do this logic for us, ending the name Factory:

public class TransactionFactory
{
     public static Transaction Create( string source, string destination, decimal amount )
     {
          if(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(destination) )
          {
               if(amount >= 0)
                    return new Credit( source, null, amount);
               else
                    return new Withdrawal( source, null, amount);
          }
          else
          {
               // Other implementations here
          }
     }
}

Now, you can use this class to do all of the logic and processing, and be assured that the type you are returned is correct.

public class MyProgram
{
     static void Main()
     {
          decimal randomAmount = new Random().Next()*1000000;
          Transaction t = TransactionFactory.Create("123456","",randomAmount);
          // t.Complete(); <-- This would carry out the requested transaction.
 
          Console.WriteLine("{0}: {1:C}",t.GetType().Name, t.Amount);
     }
}

Singleton

[edit | edit source]

The singleton pattern instantiates only 1 object, and reuses this object for the entire lifetime of the process. This is useful, if you wish the object to maintain state, or if it takes lots of resources to set the object up. Below is a basic implementation:

public class MySingletonExample
{
   private static object obj = new object();
   private volatile static Hashtable _sharedHt;

   public static Hashtable Singleton
   {
     get 
      {
         if(_sharedHt == null){
             lock(obj){
                  if(_sharedHt == null){
                     _sharedHt = new Hashtable();
                  }
             }
         }
         return _sharedHt;
      }
      // set { ; }
     // Not implemented for a true singleton
   }

   // Class implementation here..
}

The Singleton property will expose the same instance to all callers. Upon the first call, the object is initialised and on subsequent calls this is used.

Examples of this pattern include:

  • ConfigurationSettings (Generic settings reader)
  • HttpApplication (Application object in ASP .NET)
  • HttpCacheUtility (Cache object in ASP .NET)
  • HttpServerUtility (Server object in ASP .NET)

The .NET Framework

[edit | edit source]

.NET Framework is a common environment for building, deploying, and running Web Services, Web Applications, Windows Services and Windows Applications. The .NET Framework contains common class libraries - like ADO.NET, ASP.NET and Windows Forms - to provide advanced standard services that can be integrated into a variety of computer systems.

Introduction

[edit | edit source]

In June 2000 Microsoft released both the .NET platform and a new program language called C#. C# is a general-purpose OOP language designed to give optimum simplicity, expansiveness, and performance. Its syntax is very similar to Java, with the major difference being that all variable types are derived from a common ancestor class.

C# is a language in itself. It can perform mathematical and logical operations, variable assignment and other expected traits of a programming language. This in itself is not flexible enough for more complex applications. At some stage, the developer will want to interact with the host system whether it be reading files or downloading content from the Internet.

The .NET framework is a toolset developed for the Windows platform to allow the developer to interact with the host system or any external entity whether it be another process, or another computer. The .NET platform is a Windows platform-specific implementation. Other operating systems have their own implementations due to the differences in the operating systems I/O management, security models and interfaces.

Background

[edit | edit source]
  • Originally called NGWS (Next Generation Windows Services).
  • .NET does not run in any browser. It is a runtime language (Common Language Runtime) like the Java runtime. By contrast, Microsoft Silverlight does run in a browser.
  • .NET is based on the newest Web standards.
  • .NET is built on the following Internet standards:
    • HTTP, the communication protocol between Internet Applications
    • SOAP, the standard format for requesting Web Services
    • UDDI, the standard to search and discover Web Services
    • XML, the format for exchanging data between Internet Applications


Console Programming

[edit | edit source]

Input

[edit | edit source]

Input can be gathered in a similar method to outputting data using the Read() and ReadLine methods of that same System.Console class:

using System;
public class ExampleClass
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Greetings!  What is your name?");
        Console.Write("My name is: ");
        string name = Console.ReadLine();

        Console.WriteLine("Nice to meet you, " + name);
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

The above program requests the user's name and displays it back. The final Console.ReadKey() waits for the user to enter a key before exiting the program.

Output

[edit | edit source]

The example program below shows a couple of ways to output text:

using System;

public class HelloWorld
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Hello World!");             // relies on "using System;"
        Console.Write("This is...");
        Console.Write(" my first program!\n");
        System.Console.WriteLine("Goodbye World!");    // no "using" statement required
    }
}

The above code displays the following text:

Hello World!
This is... my first program!
Goodbye World!

That text is output using the System.Console class. The using statement at the top allows the compiler to find the Console class without specifying the System namespace each time it is used.

The middle lines use the Write() method, which does not automatically create a new line. To specify a new line, we can use the sequence backslash-n (\n). If for whatever reason we wanted to really show the \n character instead, we add a second backslash (\\n). The backslash is known as the escape character in C# because it is not treated as a normal character, but allows us to encode certain special characters (like a new line character).

Error

[edit | edit source]

The Error output is used to divert error specific messages to the console. To a novice user this may seem fairly pointless, as this achieves the same as Output (as above). If you decide to write an application that runs another application (for example a scheduler), you may wish to monitor the output of that program - more specifically, you may only wish to be notified only of the errors that occur. If you coded your program to write to the Console.Error stream whenever an error occurred, you can tell your scheduler program to monitor this stream, and feedback any information that is sent to it. Instead of the Console appearing with the Error messages, your program may wish to log these to a file.

You may wish to revisit this after studying Streams and after learning about the Process class.

Command line arguments

[edit | edit source]

Command line arguments are values that are passed to a console program before execution. For example, the Windows command prompt includes a copy command that takes two command line arguments. The first argument is the original file and the second is the location or name for the new copy. Custom console applications can have arguments as well. c sharp is object based programming language. .net framework is a Microsoft programming language is used to create web application,console application, mobile application.

using Sys
{
    public static void Main(string[] args)
    Console.WriteLine("Last Name: " + args[1]);
    Console.Read();
}

If the above code is compiled to a program called username.exe, it can be executed from the command line using two arguments, e.g. "Bill" and "Gates":

C:\>username.exe Bill Gates

Notice how the Main() method above has a string array parameter. The program assumes that there will be two arguments. That assumption makes the program unsafe. If it is run without the expected number of command line arguments, it will crash when it attempts to access the missing argument. To make the program more robust, we can check to see if the user entered all the required arguments.

using System;

public class Test
{
    public static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        if(args.Length >= 1)
        Console.WriteLine(args[0]);
        if(args.Length >= 2)
        Console.WriteLine(args[1]);
    }
}

Try running the program with only entering your first name or no name at all. The args.Length property returns the total number of arguments. If no arguments are given, it will return zero.

You are also able to group a single argument together by using the quote marks (""). This is particularly useful if you are expecting many parameters, but there is a requirement for including spaces (e.g. file locations, file names, full names etc.)

using System;

class Test
{
   public static void Main(string[] args)
   {
      for (int index = 0; index < args.Length; index++)
      {
         Console.WriteLine((index + 1) + ": " + args[index]);
      }
   }
}
C:\> Test.exe Separate words "grouped together"
1: Separate
2: words
3: grouped together

Formatted output

[edit | edit source]

Console.Write() and Console.WriteLine() allow you to output a text string, but also allows writing a string with variable substitution.

These two functions normally have a string as the first parameter. When additional objects are added, either as parameters or as an array, the function will scan the string to substitute objects in place of tokens.

For example:

{
  int i = 10;
  Console.WriteLine("i = {0}", i);
}

The {0} is identified by braces, and refers to the parameter index that needs to be substituted. You may also find a format specifier within the braces, which is preceded by a colon and the specifier in the question (e.g. {0:G}).

Rounding number example

[edit | edit source]

This is a small example that rounds a number to a string. It is an augmentation for the Math class of C#. The result of the Round method has to be rounded to a string, as significant figures may be trailing zeros that would disappear, if a number format would be used. Here is the code and its call. You are invited to write a shorter version that gives the same result, or to correct errors!

The constant class contains repeating constants that should exist only once in the code so that to avoid inadvertant changes. (If the one constant is changed inadvertantly, it is most likely to be seen, as it is used at several locations.)

using System;

namespace ConsoleApplicationCommons
{
    class Common
    {
        /// <summary>Constant of comma or decimal point in German</summary>
        public const char COMMA = ',';
        /// <summary>Dash or minus constant</summary>
        public const char DASH = '-';
        /// <summary>
        /// The exponent sign in a scientific number, or the capital letter E
        /// </summary>
        public const char EXPONENT = 'E';
        /// <summary>The full stop or period</summary>
        public const char PERIOD = '.';
        /// <summary>The zero string constant used at several places</summary>
        public const String ZERO = "0";
    } // class Common
}

The Math class is an enhancement to the <math.h> library and contains the rounding calculations.

using System;
using System.Globalization;
using System.IO;
using System.Text;

namespace ConsoleApplicationCommons
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Class for special mathematical calculations.
    /// ATTENTION: Should not depend on any other class except Java libraries!
    /// </summary>
    public class Maths
    {
        public static CultureInfo invC = CultureInfo.InvariantCulture;
        /// <summary>
        /// Value after which the language switches from scientific to double
        /// </summary>
        private const double E_TO_DOUBLE = 1E-4;
        /// <summary>
        /// Maximal digits after which Convert.ToString(…) becomes inaccurate.
        /// </summary>
        private const short MAX_CHARACTERS = 16;
        /// <summary>The string of zeros</summary>
        private static String strZeros = "000000000000000000000000000000000";

        /// <summary>
        /// Determines language-independently whether or not the character
        /// can be a decimal separator or not
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="character">Character to be checked</param>
        /// <returns>
        /// true, if it can be a decimal separator in a language, and false
        /// otherwise.
        /// </returns>
        private static bool IsDecimalSeparator(char c)
        {
            return ((c == Common.COMMA) || (c == Common.PERIOD));
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Determines how many zeros are to be appended after the decimal
        /// digits.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="separator">
        /// Language-specific decimal separator
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="d">Rounded number</param>
        /// <param name="significantsAfter">
        /// Significant digits after decimal
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>Requested value</returns>
        private static short CalculateMissingSignificantZeros(char separator,
            double d,
            short significantsAfter)
        {
            short after = FindSignificantsAfterDecimal(separator, d);

            short zeros = (short)(significantsAfter
                - ((after == 0) ? 1 : after));

            return (short)((zeros >= 0) ? zeros : 0);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Finds the decimal position language-independently.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="value">
        /// Value to be searched for the decimal separator
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>The position of the decimal separator</returns>
        private static short FindDecimalSeparatorPosition(String value)
        {
            short separatorAt = (short)value.IndexOf(Common.COMMA);

            return (separatorAt > -1)
                ? separatorAt : (short)value.IndexOf(Common.PERIOD);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Calculates the number of significant digits (without the sign and
        /// the decimal separator).
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="separator">
        /// Language-specific decimal separator
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="d">Value where the digits are to be counted</param>
        /// <param name="significantsAfter">
        /// Number of decimal places after the separator
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>Number of significant digits</returns>
        private static short FindSignificantDigits(char separator,
            double d,
            short significantsAfter)
        {
            if (d == 0) return 0;
            else
            {
                String mantissa = FindMantissa(separator, 
                    Convert.ToString(d, invC));

                if (d == (long)d)
                {
                    mantissa = mantissa.Substring(0, mantissa.Length - 1);
                }

                mantissa = RetrieveDigits(mantissa);
                // Find the position of the first non-zero digit:
                short nonZeroAt = 0;

                for (; (nonZeroAt < mantissa.Length)
                        && (mantissa[nonZeroAt] == '0'); nonZeroAt++) ;

                return (short)mantissa.Substring(nonZeroAt).Length;
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Finds the significant digits after the decimal separator of a
        /// mantissa.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="separator">Language-specific decimal separator</param>
        /// <param name="d">Value to be scrutinised</param>
        /// <returns>Number of insignificant zeros after decimal separator.
        /// </returns>
        private static short FindSignificantsAfterDecimal(char separator,
            double d)
        {
            if (d == 0) return 1;
            else
            {
                String value = ConvertToString(d);

                short separatorAt = FindDecimalSeparatorPosition(value);

                if (separatorAt > -1) value = value.Substring(separatorAt + 1);

                short eAt = (short) value.IndexOf(Common.EXPONENT);

                if ((separatorAt == -1) && (eAt == -1)) return 0;
                else if (eAt > 0) value = value.Substring(0, eAt);

                long longValue = Convert.ToInt64(value, invC);

                if (longValue == 0) return 0;
                else if (Math.Abs(d) < 1)
                {
                    value = Convert.ToString(longValue, invC);

                    if (value.Length >= 15)
                    {
                        return (byte)Convert.ToString(longValue, invC).Length;
                    }
                    else return (byte)(value.Length);
                }
                else
                {
                    if (value.Length >= 15) return (byte)(value.Length - 1);
                    else return (byte)(value.Length);
                }
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Determines the number of significant digits after the decimal
        /// separator knowing the total number of significant digits and
        /// the number before the decimal separator.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="significantsBefore">
        /// Number of significant digits before separator
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="significantDigits">
        /// Number of all significant digits
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>
        /// Number of significant decimals after the separator
        /// </returns>
        private static short FindSignificantsAfterDecimal(
            short significantsBefore,
            short significantDigits)
        {
            short significantsAfter =
                (short)(significantDigits - significantsBefore);

            return (short)((significantsAfter > 0) ? significantsAfter : 0);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Determines the number of digits before the decimal point.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="separator">
        /// Language-specific decimal separator
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="value">Value to be scrutinised</param>
        /// <returns>
        /// Number of digits before the decimal separator
        /// </returns>
        private static short FindSignificantsBeforeDecimal(char separator,
            double d)
        {
            String value = Convert.ToString(d, invC);

            // Return immediately, if result is clear: Special handling at
            // crossroads of floating point and exponential numbers:
            if ((d == 0) || (Math.Abs(d) >= E_TO_DOUBLE) && (Math.Abs(d) < 1))
            {
                return 0;
            }
            else if ((Math.Abs(d) > 0) && (Math.Abs(d) < E_TO_DOUBLE)) return 1;
            else
            {
                short significants = 0;

                for (short s = 0; s < value.Length; s++)
                {
                    if (IsDecimalSeparator(value[s])) break;
                    else if (value[s] != Common.DASH) significants++;
                }

                return significants;
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Returns the exponent part of the double number.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="d">Value of which the exponent is of interest</param>
        /// <returns>Exponent of the number or zero.</returns>
        private static short FindExponent(double d)
        {
            return short.Parse(FindExponent(Convert.ToString(d, invC)), invC);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Finds the exponent of a number.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="value">
        /// Value where an exponent is to be searched
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>Exponent, if it exists, or "0".</returns>
        private static String FindExponent(String value)
        {
            short eAt = (short)(value.IndexOf(Common.EXPONENT));

            if (eAt < 0) return Common.ZERO;
            else
            {
                return Convert.ToString
                    (short.Parse(value.Substring(eAt + 1)), invC);
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Finds the mantissa of a number.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="separator">
        /// Language-specific decimal separator
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="value">Value where the mantissa is to be found</param>
        /// <returns>Mantissa of the number</returns>
        private static String FindMantissa(char separator,
            String value)
        {
            short eAt = (short)(value.IndexOf(Common.EXPONENT));

            if (eAt > -1) value = value.Substring(0, eAt);

            if (FindDecimalSeparatorPosition(value) == -1) value += ".0";

            return value;
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Retrieves the digits of the value only
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="d">Number</param>
        /// <returns>The digits only</returns>
        private static String RetrieveDigits(double d)
        {
            double dValue = d;
            short exponent = FindExponent(d);
            StringBuilder value = new StringBuilder();

            if (exponent == 0)
            {
                value.Append(dValue);

                if (value.Length >= MAX_CHARACTERS)
                {
                    value.Clear();

                    if (Math.Abs(dValue) < 1) value.Append("0");

                    // Determine the exponent for a scientific form:
                    exponent = 0;

                    while (((long)dValue != dValue) && (dValue < 1E11))
                    {
                        dValue *= 10;
                        exponent++;
                    }

                    value.Append((long)dValue);

                    while ((long)dValue != dValue)
                    {
                        dValue -= (long)dValue;

                        dValue *= 10;

                        value.Append((long)dValue);
                    }
                }
            }
            else
            {
                double multiplier = Math.Pow(10, -exponent);

                for (short s = 0; (s <= 16) && (exponent != 0); s++)
                {
                    dValue *= multiplier;

                    value.Append((long)dValue);
                    dValue -= (long)dValue;
                    exponent++;
                    multiplier = 10;
                }
            }

            if (value.Length >= MAX_CHARACTERS + 2)
                value.Length = MAX_CHARACTERS + 2;

            return RetrieveDigits(value.ToString());
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Retrieves the digits of the value only
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="number">Value to be scrutinised</param>
        /// <returns>The digits only</returns>
        private static String RetrieveDigits(String number)
        {
            // Strip off exponent part, if it exists:
            short eAt = (short)number.IndexOf(Common.EXPONENT);

            if (eAt > -1) number = number.Substring(0, eAt);

            return number.Replace(Convert.ToString(Common.DASH), "").Replace(
                Convert.ToString(Common.COMMA), "").Replace(
                Convert.ToString(Common.PERIOD), "");
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Inserts the decimal separator at the right place
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="dValue">Number</param>
        /// <param name="value">
        /// String variable, where the separator is to be added.
        /// </param>
        private static void InsertSeparator(double dValue, StringBuilder value)
        {
            short separatorAt = (short)Convert.ToString((long)dValue).Length;

            if (separatorAt < value.Length)
                value.Insert(separatorAt, Common.PERIOD);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Calculates the power of the base to the exponent without changing
        /// the least-significant digits of a number.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="basis"></param>
        /// <param name="exponent">basis to power of exponent</param>
        /// <returns></returns>
        public static double Power(int basis, short exponent)
        {
            return Power((short)basis, exponent);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Calculates the power of the base to the exponent without changing
        /// the least-significant digits of a number.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="basis"></param>
        /// <param name="exponent"></param>
        /// <returns>basis to power of exponent</returns>
        public static double Power(short basis, short exponent)
        {
            if (basis == 0) return (exponent != 0) ? 1 : 0;   
            else
            {
                if (exponent == 0) return 1;
                else
                {
                    // The Math method power does change the least significant
                    // digits after the decimal separator and is therefore
                    // useless.
                    long result = 1;
                    short s = 0;

                    if (exponent > 0)
                    {
                        for (; s < exponent; s++) result *= basis;
                    }
                    else if (exponent < 0)
                    {
                        for (s = exponent; s < 0; s++) result /= basis;
                    }

                    return result;
                }
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Rounds a number to the decimal places.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="d">Number to be rounded</param>
        /// <param name="separator">
        /// Language-specific decimal separator
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="significantsAfter">
        /// Number of decimal places after the separator
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>Rounded number to the requested decimal places</returns>
        public static double Round(char separator,
            double d,
            short significantsAfter)
        {
            if (d == 0) return 0;
            else
            {
                double constant = Power(10, significantsAfter);
                short dsExponent = FindExponent(d);

                short exponent = dsExponent;

                double value = d*constant*Math.Pow(10, -exponent);
                String exponentSign = (exponent < 0)
                    ? Convert.ToString(Common.DASH) : "";

                if (exponent != 0)
                {
                    exponent = (short)Math.Abs(exponent);

                    value = Round(value);
                }
                else
                {
                    while (FindSignificantsBeforeDecimal(separator, value)
                        < significantsAfter)
                    {
                        constant *= 10;
                        value *= 10;
                    }

                    value = Round(value)/constant;
                }

                // Power method cannot be used, as the exponentiated number may
                // exceed the maximal long value.
                exponent -= (short)(Math.Sign(dsExponent)*
                    (FindSignificantDigits(separator, value, significantsAfter)
                    - 1));
            
                if (dsExponent != 0)
                {
                    String strValue = Convert.ToString(value, invC);

                    short separatorAt = FindDecimalSeparatorPosition(strValue);

                    if (separatorAt > -1)
                    {
                        strValue = strValue.Substring(0, separatorAt);
                    }

                    strValue += Common.EXPONENT + exponentSign
                        + Convert.ToString(exponent);

                    value = double.Parse(strValue, invC);
                }
            
                return value;
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Rounds a number according to mathematical rules.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="d">Number to be rounded</param>
        /// <returns>Rounded number</returns>
        public static double Round(double d)
        {
            return (long)(d + .5);
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Converts a double value to a string such that it reflects the double
        /// format (without converting it to a scientific format by itself, as
        /// it is the case with Convert.ToString(double, invC)).
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="d">Value to be converted</param>
        /// <returns>Same format value as a string</returns>
        public static String ConvertToString(double d)
        {
            double dValue = d;
            StringBuilder value = new StringBuilder();

            if (Math.Sign(dValue) == -1) value.Append(Common.DASH);

            if ((dValue > 1E-5) && (dValue < 1E-4))
            {
                value.Append("0");

                while ((long)dValue == 0)
                {
                    dValue *= 10;

                    if (dValue >= 1) break;

                    value.Append(Convert.ToString((long)dValue));
                }
            }

            short exponent = FindExponent(d);

            if (exponent != 0)
            {
                value.Append(RetrieveDigits(dValue));
                InsertSeparator(dValue, value);
                value.Append(Common.EXPONENT);
                value.Append(exponent);
            }
            else
            {
                value.Append(RetrieveDigits(dValue));

                InsertSeparator(dValue, value);

                if (value.Length > MAX_CHARACTERS + 3)
                {
                    value.Length = MAX_CHARACTERS + 3;
                }
            }

            return value.ToString();
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Rounds to a fixed number of significant digits.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="d">Number to be rounded</param>
        /// <param name="significantDigits">
        /// Requested number of significant digits
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="separator">
        /// Language-specific decimal separator
        /// </param>
        /// <returns>Rounded number</returns>
        public static String RoundToString(char separator,
            double d,
            short significantDigits)
        {
            // Number of significants that *are* before the decimal separator:
            short significantsBefore =
                FindSignificantsBeforeDecimal(separator, d);
            // Number of decimals that *should* be after the decimal separator:
            short significantsAfter = FindSignificantsAfterDecimal(
                    significantsBefore, significantDigits);
            // Round to the specified number of digits after decimal separator:
            double rounded = Maths.Round(separator, d, significantsAfter);

            String exponent = FindExponent(Convert.ToString(rounded, invC));
            String mantissa = FindMantissa(separator, 
                            Convert.ToString(rounded, invC));

            double dMantissa = double.Parse(mantissa, invC);
            StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder(mantissa);
            // Determine the significant digits in this number:
            short significants = FindSignificantDigits(separator, dMantissa,
                significantsAfter);
            // Add lagging zeros, if necessary:
            if (significants <= significantDigits)
            {
                if (significantsAfter != 0)
                {
                    result.Append(strZeros.Substring(0,
                        CalculateMissingSignificantZeros(separator,
                            dMantissa, significantsAfter)));
                }
                else
                {
                    // Cut off the decimal separator & after decimal digits:
                    short decimalValue = (short) result.ToString().IndexOf(
                            Convert.ToString(separator));
                
                    if (decimalValue > -1) result.Length = decimalValue;
                }
            }
            else if (significantsBefore > significantDigits)
            {
                d /= Power(10, (short)(significantsBefore - significantDigits));

                d = Round(d);
            
                short digits = (short)(significantDigits + ((d < 0) ? 1 : 0));
            
                String strD = d.ToString().Substring(0, digits);
            
                result.Length = 0;
                result.Append(strD + strZeros.Substring(0,
                        significantsBefore - significantDigits));
            }
        
            if (short.Parse(exponent, invC) != 0)
            {
                result.Append(Common.EXPONENT + exponent);
            }
        
            return result.ToString();
        } // public static String RoundToString(…)

        /// <summary>
        /// Rounds to a fixed number of significant digits.
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="separator">
        /// Language-specific decimal separator
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="significantDigits">
        /// Requested number of significant digits
        /// </param>
        /// <param name="value"></param>
        /// <returns></returns>
        public static String RoundToString(char separator,
                float value,
                int significantDigits)
        {
            return RoundToString(separator, (double)value,
                (short)significantDigits);
        }
    }   // public class Maths
}

Extensive testing of a software is crucial for qualitative code. To say that the code is tested does not give much information. The question is what is tested. Not in this case, but often it is also important to know where (in which environment) it was tested, and how - i.e. the test succession. Here is the code used to test the Maths class.

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

namespace ConsoleApplicationCommons
{
    class TestCommon
    {
        /// <summary>
        /// Test for the common functionality
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="args"></param>
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            // Test rounding
            List<double> values = new List<double>();

            values.Add(0.0);
            AddValue(1.4012984643248202e-45, values);
            AddValue(1.999999757e-5, values);
            AddValue(1.999999757e-4, values);
            AddValue(1.999999757e-3, values);
            AddValue(0.000640589, values);
            AddValue(0.3396899998188019, values);
            AddValue(0.34, values);
            AddValue(7.07, values);
            AddValue(118.188, values);
            AddValue(118.2, values);
            AddValue(123.405009, values);
            AddValue(30.76994323730469, values);
            AddValue(130.76994323730469, values);
            AddValue(540, values);
            AddValue(12345, values);
            AddValue(123456, values);
            AddValue(540911, values);
            AddValue(9.223372036854776e56, values);

            const short SIGNIFICANTS = 5;
        
            foreach (double element in values)
            {
                Console.Out.WriteLine("Maths.Round('" + Common.PERIOD + "', "
                    + Convert.ToString(element, Maths.invC) + ", "
                    + SIGNIFICANTS + ") = " + Maths.RoundToString
                        (Common.PERIOD, element, SIGNIFICANTS));
            }

            Console.In.Read();
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Method that adds a negative and a positive value
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="d"></param>
        /// <param name="values"></param>
        private static void AddValue(double d, List<double> values)
        {
            values.Add(-d);
            values.Add(d);
        }
    } // class TestCommon
}

The results of your better code should comply with the result I got:

Maths.Round('.', 0, 5) = 0.00000
Maths.Round('.', -1.40129846432482E-45, 5) = -1.4012E-45
Maths.Round('.', 1.40129846432482E-45, 5) = 1.4013E-45
Maths.Round('.', -1.999999757E-05, 5) = -1.9999E-5
Maths.Round('.', 1.999999757E-05, 5) = 2.0000E-5
Maths.Round('.', -0.0001999999757, 5) = -0.00019999
Maths.Round('.', 0.0001999999757, 5) = 0.00020000
Maths.Round('.', -0.001999999757, 5) = -0.0019999
Maths.Round('.', 0.001999999757, 5) = 0.0020000
Maths.Round('.', -0.000640589, 5) = -0.00064058
Maths.Round('.', 0.000640589, 5) = 0.00064059
Maths.Round('.', -0.339689999818802, 5) = -0.33968
Maths.Round('.', 0.339689999818802, 5) = 0.33969
Maths.Round('.', -0.34, 5) = -0.33999
Maths.Round('.', 0.34, 5) = 0.34000
Maths.Round('.', -7.07, 5) = -7.0699
Maths.Round('.', 7.07, 5) = 7.0700
Maths.Round('.', -118.188, 5) = -118.18
Maths.Round('.', 118.188, 5) = 118.19
Maths.Round('.', -118.2, 5) = -118.19
Maths.Round('.', 118.2, 5) = 118.20
Maths.Round('.', -123.405009, 5) = -123.40
Maths.Round('.', 123.405009, 5) = 123.41
Maths.Round('.', -30.7699432373047, 5) = -30.769
Maths.Round('.', 30.7699432373047, 5) = 30.770
Maths.Round('.', -130.769943237305, 5) = -130.76
Maths.Round('.', 130.769943237305, 5) = 130.77
Maths.Round('.', -540, 5) = -539.99
Maths.Round('.', 540, 5) = 540.00
Maths.Round('.', -12345, 5) = -12344
Maths.Round('.', 12345, 5) = 12345
Maths.Round('.', -123456, 5) = -123450
Maths.Round('.', 123456, 5) = 123460
Maths.Round('.', -540911, 5) = -540900
Maths.Round('.', 540911, 5) = 540910
Maths.Round('.', -9.22337203685478E+56, 5) = -9.2233E56
Maths.Round('.', 9.22337203685478E+56, 5) = 9.2234E56

If you are interested in a comparison with C++, please compare it with the same example there. If you want to compare C# with Java, take a look at the rounding number example there.

System.Windows.Forms

[edit | edit source]

To create a Windows desktop application we use the library represented by System.Windows.Forms namespace. Some commonly used classes in this namespace include:

  • Control - generic class from which other useful classes, like Form, TextBox and others listed below are derived
  • Form - this is the base class for the program window. All other controls are placed directly onto a Form or indirectly on another container (like TabPage or TabControl) that ultimately resides on the Form. When automatically created in Visual Studio, it is usually subclassed as Form1.
  • Button - a clickable button
  • TextBox - a singleline or multiline textbox that can be used for displaying or inputting text
  • RichTextBox - an extended TextBox that can display styled text, e.g. with parts of the text colored or with a specified font. RichTextBox can also display generalized RTF document, including embedded images.
  • Label - simple control allowing display of a single line of unstyled text, often used for various captions and titles
  • ListBox - control displaying multiple items (lines of text) with ability to select an item and to scroll through it
  • ComboBox - similar to ListBox, but resembling a dropdown menu
  • TabControl and TabPage - used to group controls in a tabbed interface (much like tabbed interface in Visual Studio or Mozilla Firefox). A TabControl contains a collection of TabPage objects.
  • DataGrid - data grid/table view

Form class

[edit | edit source]

The Form class (System.Windows.Forms.Form) is a particularly important part of that namespace because the form is the key graphical building block of Windows applications. It provides the visual frame that holds buttons, menus, icons, and title bars together. Integrated development environments (IDEs) like Visual C# and SharpDevelop can help create graphical applications, but it is important to know how to do so manually:

using System.Windows.Forms;

public class ExampleForm : Form    // inherits from System.Windows.Forms.Form
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        ExampleForm wikibooksForm = new ExampleForm();

        wikibooksForm.Text = "I Love Wikibooks";  // specify title of the form
        wikibooksForm.Width = 400;                // width of the window in pixels
        wikibooksForm.Height = 300;               // height in pixels
        Application.Run(wikibooksForm);           // display the form
    }
}

The example above creates a simple Window with the text "I Love Wikibooks" in the title bar. Custom form classes like the example above inherit from the System.Windows.Forms.Form class. Setting any of the properties Text, Width, and Height is optional. Your program will compile and run successfully, if you comment these lines out, but they allow us to add extra control to our form.

Events

[edit | edit source]

An event is an action being taken by the program when a user or the computer makes an action (for example, a button is clicked, a mouse rolls over an image, etc.). An event handler is an object that determines what action should be taken when an event is triggered.

using System.Windows.Forms;
using System.Drawing;

public class ExampleForm : Form    // inherits from System.Windows.Forms.Form
{
    public ExampleForm()
    {
        this.Text = "I Love Wikibooks";           // specify title of the form
        this.Width = 300;                         // width of the window in pixels
        this.Height = 300;                        // height in pixels

        Button HelloButton = new Button();
        HelloButton.Location = new Point(20, 20); // the location of button in pixels
        HelloButton.Size = new Size(100, 30);     // the size of button in pixels
        HelloButton.Text = "Click me!";           // the text of button

        // When clicking the button, this event fires
        HelloButton.Click += new System.EventHandler(WhenHelloButtonClick);

        this.Controls.Add(HelloButton);
    }

    void WhenHelloButtonClick(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
    {
        MessageBox.Show("You clicked! Press OK to exit this message");
    }

    public static void Main()
    {
        Application.Run(new ExampleForm());       // display the form
    }
}

Controls

[edit | edit source]


The Windows Forms namespace has a lot of very interesting classes. One of the simplest and important is the Form class. A form is the key building block of any Windows application. It provides the visual frame that holds buttons, menus, icons and title bars together. Forms can be modal and modalless, owners and owned, parents and children. While forms could be created with a notepad, using a form editor like VS.NET, C# Builder or Sharp Develop makes development much faster. In this lesson, we will not be using an IDE. Instead, save the code below into a text file and compile with command line compiler.

using System.Windows.Forms;
using System.Drawing;

public class ExampleForm : Form    // inherits from System.Windows.Forms.Form
{
    public ExampleForm()
    {
        this.Text = "I Love Wikibooks";         // specify title of the form
        this.BackColor = Color.White;
        this.Width = 300;                       // width of the window in pixels
        this.Height = 300;                      // height in pixels

        // A Label
        Label TextLabel = new Label();
        TextLabel.Text = "One Label here!";
        TextLabel.Location = new Point(20, 20);
        TextLabel.Size = new Size(150, 30);
        TextLabel.Font = new Font("Arial", 12); // See! we can modify the font of text
        this.Controls.Add(TextLabel);           // adding the control to the form

        // A input text field
        TextBox Box = new TextBox();            // inherits from Control
        Box.Location = new Point(20, 60);       // then, it have Size and Location properties
        Box.Size = new Size(100, 30);
        this.Controls.Add(Box);                 // all class that inherit from Control can be added in a form
    }

    public static void Main()
    {
        Application.EnableVisualStyles();
        Application.Run(new ExampleForm());     // display the form
    }
}

Lists

[edit | edit source]

A list is a dynamic array that resizes itself as needed, if more data is inserted than it can hold at the time of insertion. Items can be inserted at any index, deleted at any index and accessed at any index. The C# non-generic list class is the ArrayList, while the generic one is List<T>.

Many of the List class' methods and properties are demonstrated in the following example:

using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;

namespace csharp_generic_list
{
    class MainClass
    {
        public static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("List<T> demo");
            // Creating an instance that accepts strings
            List<string> foods = new List<string>();

            // Adding some items one by one with Add()
            foods.Add("bread");
            foods.Add("butter");
            foods.Add("chocolate");

            // Adding a simple string array with AddRange()
            string[] subList1 = {"orange", "apple", "strawberry", "grapes", "kiwi", "banana"};
            foods.AddRange(subList1);

            // Adding another List<string> with AddRange()
            List<string> anotherFoodList = new List<string>();
            anotherFoodList.Add("yoghurt");
            anotherFoodList.Add("tomato");
            anotherFoodList.Add("roast beef");
            anotherFoodList.Add("vanilla cake");
            foods.AddRange(anotherFoodList);

            // Removing "orange" with Remove()
            foods.Remove("orange");

            // Removing the 5th (index = 4) item ("strawberry") with RemoveAt()
            foods.RemoveAt(4);

            // Removing a range (4-7: all fruits) with RemoveRange(int index, int count)
            foods.RemoveRange(3, 4);

            // sorting the list
            foods.Sort();

            // Printing the sorted foods
            foreach (string item in foods)
            {
                Console.Write("| " + item + " ");
            }
            Console.WriteLine("|");

            // Removing all items from foods
            foods.Clear();

            // Printing the current item count in foods
            Console.WriteLine("The list now has {0} items.", foods.Count);
        }
    }
}

The terminal output is:

List<T> demo
| bread | butter | chocolate | roast beef | tomato | vanilla cake | yoghurt |
The list now has 0 items.

LinkedLists

[edit | edit source]

Items in a linked list can be accessed directly only one after the other. Of course an item at any index can be accessed, but the list must iterate to the item from the first one, which is much slower than accessing items by index in an array or a list. There is no non-generic linked list in C#, while the generic one is LinkedList<T>.

Queues

[edit | edit source]

A queue is a FIFO (first in - first out) collection. The item first pushed in the queue gets taken first with the pop function. Only the first item is accessible at any time, and items can only be put to the end. The non-generic queue class is called Queue, while the generic one is Queue<T>.

Stacks

[edit | edit source]

A stack is a LIFO (last in - first out) collection. The item pushed in first will be the last to be taken by pop. Only the last item is accessible at any time, and items can only be put at the top. The non-generic stack class is Stack, while the generic one is Stack<T>.

Hashtables and dictionaries

[edit | edit source]

A dictionary is a collection of values with keys. The values can be very complex, yet searching the keys is still fast. The non-generic class is Hashtable, while the generic one is Dictionary<TKey, TValue>.

Threads are tasks that can run concurrently to other threads and can share data. When your program starts, it creates a thread for the entry point of your program, usually a Main function. So, you can think of a "program" as being made up of threads. The .NET Framework allows you to use threading in your programs to run code in parallel to each other. This is often done for two reasons:

  1. If the thread running your graphical user interface performs time-consuming work, your program may appear to be unresponsive. Using threading, you can create a new thread to perform tasks and report its progress to the GUI thread.
  2. On computers with more than one CPU or CPUs with more than one core, threads can maximize the use of computational resources, speeding up tasks.

The Thread class

[edit | edit source]

The System.Threading.Thread class exposes basic functionality for using threads. To create a thread, you simply create an instance of the Thread class with a ThreadStart or ParameterizedThreadStart delegate pointing to the code the thread should start running. For example:

using System;
using System.Threading;

public static class Program
{
    private static void SecondThreadFunction()
    {
        while (true)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Second thread says hello.");
            Thread.Sleep(1000); // pause execution of the current thread for 1 second (1000 ms)
        }
    }
    
    public static void Main()
    {
        Thread newThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(SecondThreadFunction));
        
        newThread.Start();
        
        while (true)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("First thread says hello.");
            Thread.Sleep(500); // pause execution of the current thread for half a second (500 ms)
        }
    }
}

You should see the following output:

Second thread says hello.
First thread says hello.
First thread says hello.
Second thread says hello.
First thread says hello.
First thread says hello.
...

Notice that the while keyword is needed because as soon as the function returns, the thread exits, or terminates.

ParameterizedThreadStart

[edit | edit source]

The void ParameterizedThreadStart(object obj) delegate allows you to pass a parameter to the new thread:

using System;
using System.Threading;

public static class Program
{
    private static void SecondThreadFunction(object param)
    {
        while (true)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Second thread says " + param.ToString() + ".");
            Thread.Sleep(500); // pause execution of the current thread for half a second (500 ms)
        }
    }
    
    public static void Main()
    {
        Thread newThread = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(SecondThreadFunction));
        
        newThread.Start(1234); // here you pass a parameter to the new thread
        
        while (true)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("First thread says hello.");
            Thread.Sleep(1000); // pause execution of the current thread for a second (1000 ms)
        }
    }
}

The output is:

First thread says hello.
Second thread says 1234.
Second thread says 1234.
First thread says hello.
...

Sharing Data

[edit | edit source]

Although we could use ParameterizedThreadStart to pass parameter(s) to threads, it is not typesafe and is clumsy to use. We could exploit anonymous delegates to share data between threads, however:

using System;
using System.Threading;

public static class Program
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        int number = 1;
        Thread newThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(delegate
        {
            while (true)
            {
                number++;
                Console.WriteLine("Second thread says " + number.ToString() + ".");
                Thread.Sleep(1000);
            }
        }));
        
        newThread.Start();
        
        while (true)
        {
            number++;
            Console.WriteLine("First thread says " + number.ToString() + ".");
            Thread.Sleep(1000);
        }
    }
}

Notice how the body of the anonymous delegate can access the local variable number.

Asynchronous Delegates

[edit | edit source]

Using anonymous delegates can lead to a lot of syntax, confusion of scope, and lack of encapsulation. However with the use of lambda expressions, some of these problems can be mitigated. Instead of anonymous delegates, you can use asynchronous delegates to pass and return data, all of which is type safe. It should be noted that when you use an asynchronous delegate, you are actually queuing a new thread to the thread pool. Also, using asynchronous delegates forces you to use the asynchronous model.

using System;

public static class Program
{
     delegate int del(int[] data);
     
     public static int SumOfNumbers(int[] data)
     {
          int sum = 0;
          foreach (int number in data) {
               sum += number;
          }

          return sum;
     }

     public static void Main()
     {
          int[] numbers = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
          del func = SumOfNumbers;
          IAsyncResult result = func.BeginInvoke(numbers, null, null);
          
          // I can do stuff here while numbers is being added
          
          int sum = func.EndInvoke(result);
           sum = 15
     }
}

Synchronization

[edit | edit source]

In the sharing data example, you may have noticed that often, if not all of the time, you will get the following output:

First thread says 2.
Second thread says 3.
Second thread says 5.
First thread says 4.
Second thread says 7.
First thread says 7.

One would expect that at least, the numbers would be printed in ascending order! This problem arises because of the fact that the two pieces of code are running at the same time. For example, it printed 3, 5, then 4. Let us examine what may have occurred:

  1. After "First thread says 2", the first thread incremented number, making it 3, and printed it.
  2. The second thread then incremented number, making it 4.
  3. Just before the second thread got a chance to print number, the first thread incremented number, making it 5, and printed it.
  4. The second thread then printed what number was before the first thread incremented it, that is, 4. Note that this may have occurred due to console output buffering.

The solution to this problem is to synchronize the two threads, making sure their code doesn't interleave like it did. C# supports this through the lock keyword. We can put blocks of code under this keyword:

using System;
using System.Threading;

public static class Program
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        int number = 1;
        object numberLock = new object();
        Thread newThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(delegate
        {
            while (true)
            {
                lock (numberLock)
                {
                    number++;
                    Console.WriteLine("Second thread says " + number.ToString() + ".");
                }

                Thread.Sleep(1000);
            }
        }));
        
        newThread.Start();
        
        while (true)
        {
            lock (numberLock)
            {
                number++;
                Console.WriteLine("First thread says " + number.ToString() + ".");
            }

            Thread.Sleep(1000);
        }
    }
}

The variable numberLock is needed because the lock keyword only operates on reference types, not value types. This time, you will get the correct output:

First thread says 2.
Second thread says 3.
Second thread says 4.
First thread says 5.
Second thread says 6.
...

The lock keyword operates by trying to gain an exclusive lock on the object passed to it (numberLock). It will only release the lock when the code block has finished execution (that is, after the }). If an object is already locked when another thread tries to gain a lock on the same object, the thread will block (suspend execution) until the lock is released, and then lock the object. This way, sections of code can be prevented from interleaving.

Thread.Join()

[edit | edit source]

The Join method of the Thread class allows a thread to wait for another thread, optionally specifying a timeout:

using System;
using System.Threading;

public static class Program
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Thread newThread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(delegate
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Second thread reporting.");
            Thread.Sleep(5000);
            Console.WriteLine("Second thread done sleeping.");
        }));

        newThread.Start();
        Console.WriteLine("Just started second thread.");
        newThread.Join(1000);
        Console.WriteLine("First thread waited for 1 second.");
        newThread.Join();
        Console.WriteLine("First thread finished waiting for second thread. Press any key.");
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

The output is:

Just started second thread.
Second thread reporting.
First thread waited for 1 second.
Second thread done sleeping.
First thread finished waiting for second thread. Press any key.

The .NET Framework currently supports calling unmanaged functions and using unmanaged data, a process called marshalling. This is often done to use Windows API functions and data structures, but can also be used with custom libraries.

GetSystemTimes

[edit | edit source]

A simple example to start with is the Windows API function GetSystemTimes. It is declared as:

BOOL WINAPI GetSystemTimes(
  __out_opt  LPFILETIME lpIdleTime,
  __out_opt  LPFILETIME lpKernelTime,
  __out_opt  LPFILETIME lpUserTime
);

LPFILETIME is a pointer to a FILETIME structure, which is simply a 64-bit integer. Since C# supports 64-bit numbers through the long type, we can use that. We can then import and use the function as follows:

using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

public class Program
{
    [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
    static extern bool GetSystemTimes(out long idleTime, out long kernelTime, out long userTime);
    
    public static void Main()
    {
        long idleTime, kernelTime, userTime;
        
        GetSystemTimes(out idleTime, out kernelTime, out userTime);
        Console.WriteLine("Your CPU(s) have been idle for: " + (new TimeSpan(idleTime)).ToString());
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

Note that the use of out or ref in parameters automatically makes it a pointer to the unmanaged function.

GetProcessIoCounters

[edit | edit source]

To pass pointers to structs, we can use the out or ref keyword:

using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

public class Program
{
    struct IO_COUNTERS
    {
        public ulong ReadOperationCount;
        public ulong WriteOperationCount;
        public ulong OtherOperationCount;
        public ulong ReadTransferCount;
        public ulong WriteTransferCount;
        public ulong OtherTransferCount;
    }

    [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
    static extern bool GetProcessIoCounters(IntPtr ProcessHandle, out IO_COUNTERS IoCounters);

    public static void Main()
    {
        IO_COUNTERS counters;

        GetProcessIoCounters(System.Diagnostics.Process.GetCurrentProcess().Handle, out counters);
        Console.WriteLine("This process has read " + counters.ReadTransferCount.ToString("N0") + 
            " bytes of data.");
        Console.ReadKey();
    }
}

Keywords

[edit | edit source]


C# Keywords
abstract as base bool break
byte case catch char checked
class const continue decimal default
delegate do double else enum
event explicit extern false finally
fixed float for foreach goto
if implicit in int interface
internal is lock long namespace
new null object operator out
override params private protected public
readonly ref return sbyte sealed
short sizeof stackalloc static string
struct switch this throw true
try typeof uint ulong unchecked
unsafe ushort using var virtual
void volatile while
Special C# Identifiers (Contextual Keywords)
add alias async await dynamic
get global nameof partial remove
set value when where yield
Contextual Keywords (Used in Queries)
ascending by descending equals from
group in into join let
on orderby select where

Abstract classes may contain abstract members in addition to implemented ones. That is, while some of the methods and properties in an abstract class may be implemented, others (the abstract members) may have their signatures defined, but have no implementation. Concrete subclasses derived from an abstract class define those methods and properties.

The as keyword casts an object to a different type. It is therefore similar to the TypeA varA = (TypeA) varB syntax. The difference is that this keyword returns null if the object was of an incompatible type, while the former method throws a type-cast exception in that case.

See also

[edit | edit source]

The keyword base describes that you would like to refer to the base class for the requested information, not in the current instantiated class.

A base class is the class in which the currently implemented class inherits from. When creating a class with no defined base class, the compiler automatically uses the System.Object base class.

Therefore the two declarations below are equivalent.

public class MyClass
{
}

public class MyClass : System.Object
{
}

Some of the reasons the base keyword is used is:

  • Passing information to the base class's constructor
public class MyCustomException : System.Exception
{
     public MyCustomException() : base() {}

     public MyCustomerException(string message, Exception innerException) : base(message,innerException) {}

     // ......
}
  • Recalling variables in the base class, where the newly implemented class is overriding its behaviour
public class MyBaseClass
{
     protected string className = "MyBaseClass";
}

public class MyNewClass : MyBaseClass
{
     protected new string className = "MyNewClass";

     public override string BaseClassName
     {
          get { return base.className; }
     }
}
  • Recalling methods in the base class. This is useful when you want to add to a method, but still keep the underlying implementation.
// Necessary using's here

public class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page
{
     protected void InitializeCulture()
     {
          System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentUICulture =
                              CultureInfo.GetSpecificCulture(Page.UICulture);

          base.InitializeCulture();
     }
}


The bool keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Boolean. That is, it represents a value of true or false. Unlike in C++, whose boolean is actually an integer, a bool in C# is its own data type and cannot be cast to any other primitive type.

The keyword break is used to exit out of a loop or switch block.

break as used in a loop
int x;
 
while (x < 20){

   if (x > 10) break;

   x++;
}

The while loop would increment x as long as it was less than twenty. However when x is incremented to ten the condition in the if statement becomes true, so the break statement causes the while loop to be broken and execution would continue after the closing parentheses.

break as used in a switch block
int x;

switch (x)
    {
    case 0:
        Console.WriteLine("x is 0");
        break;
    case 1:
        Console.WriteLine("x is 1");
        break;
    case 2:
        // falls through
    case 3:
        Console.WriteLine("x is 2 or 3");
        break;
    }

When the program enters the switch block, it will search for a case statement that is true. Once it finds one, it will read any further statements printed until it finds a break statement. In the above example, if x is 0 or 1, the console will only print their respective values and then jump out of the statement. However, if the value of x is 2 or 3, the program will read the same proceeding statement(s) until it reaches a break statement. In order not to show anybody who reads the code that this handling for 2 is the same for three, it is good programming practice to add a comment like "falls through" after the falling-through cases.


The byte keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Byte. That is, it represents an 8-bit unsigned integer whose value ranges from 0 to 255.


The keyword case is often used in a switch statement.


The keyword catch is used to identify a statement or statement block for execution, if an exception occurs in the body of the enclosing try block. The catch clause is preceded by the try clause, and may optionally be followed by a finally clause.


The char keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Char. That is, it represents a Unicode character whose from 0 to 65,535.


The checked and unchecked operators are used to control the overflow checking context for integral-type arithmetic operations and conversions. It checks, if there is an overflow (this is default).

See also


The class keyword is used to declare a class.


The const keyword is used in field and local variable declarations to make the variable constant. It is thus associated with its declaring class or assembly instead of with an instance of the class or with a method call. It is syntactically invalid to assign a value to such a variable anywhere other than its declaration.

Further reading

The keyword continue can be used inside any loop in a method. Its affect is to end the current loop iteration and proceed to the next one. If executed inside a for, end-of-loop statement is executed (just like normal loop termination).


The decimal keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Decimal. That is, it represents a signed, 128-bit decimal number whose value is 0 or a decimal number with 28 or 29 digits of precision ranging either from to or from to .


The default keyword can be used in the switch statement or in generic code:[1]

  • The switch statement: Specifies the default label.
  • Generic code: Specifies the default value of the type parameter. This will be null for reference types and zero for value types.

References

[edit | edit source]
  1. "default (C# Reference)". http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/: MSDN. Retrieved 2011-08-09. {{cite web}}: External link in |location= (help)


The delegate keyword is used to declare a delegate. A delegate is a programming construct that is used to obtain a callable reference to a method of a class.


The do keyword identifies the beginning of a do ... loop.


The double keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Double. That is, it represents an IEEE 754, 64-bit signed binary floating point number whose value is negative 0, positive 0, negative infinity, positive infinity, not a number, or a number ranging either from to or from to .


The else keyword identifies a else clause of an if statement with the following syntax:

if-statement ::= "if" "(" condition ")" if-body "else" else-body
condition ::= boolean-expression
if-body ::= statement-or-statement-block
else-body ::= statement-or-statement-block

An else clause immediately follows an if-body. It provides code to execute when the condition is false. Making the else-body another if statement creates the common cascade of if, else if, else if, else if, else statements:

using System;

public class IfStatementSample
{
    public void IfMyNumberIs()
    {
        int myNumber = 5;
        if (myNumber == 4)
            Console.WriteLine("This will not be shown because myNumber is not 4.");
        else if(myNumber < 0)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("This will not be shown because myNumber is not negative.");
        }
        else if(myNumber%2 == 0)
            Console.WriteLine("This will not be shown because myNumber is not even.");
        else
        {
            Console.WriteLine("myNumber does not match the coded conditions, so this sentence will be shown!");
        }
    }
}

The above example only checks whether myNumber is less than 0, if myNumber is not 4. It in turn only checks whether myNumber%2 is 0, if myNumber is not less than 0. Since none of the conditions are true, it executes the body of the final else clause.


The enum keyword identifies an enumeration.


The event keyword is used to declare an event.


General

[edit | edit source]

When values are cast implicitly, the runtime does not need any casting in code by the developer in order for the value to be converted to its new type.

Here is an example, where the developer is casting explicitly:

// Example of explicit casting.
float fNumber = 100.00f;
int iNumber = (int) fNumber;

The developer has told the runtime, "I know what I'm doing, force this conversion."

Implicit casting means that runtime doesn't need any prompting in order to do the conversion. Here is an example of this.

// Example of implicit casting.
byte bNumber = 10;
int iNumber = bNumber;

Keyword

[edit | edit source]

Notice that no casting was necessary by the developer. What is special about implicit, is that the context that the type is converted to is totally lossless i.e. converting to this type loses no information, so it can be converted back without worry.

The explicit keyword is used to create type conversion operators that can only be used by specifying an explicit type cast.

This construct is useful to help software developers write more readable code. Having an explicit cast name makes it clear that a conversion is taking place.

class Something 
{
  public static explicit operator Something(string s)
  {
     // Convert the string to Something
  }
}

string x = "hello";

// Implicit conversion (string to Something) generates a compile time error
Something s = x;

// This statement is correct (explicit type name conversion)
Something s = (Something) x;


The keyword extern indicates that the method being called exists in a DLL.

A tool called tlbimp.exe can create a wrapper assembly that allows C# to interact with the DLL like it was a .NET assembly i.e. use constructors to instantiate it, call its methods.

Older DLLs will not work with this method. Instead, you have to explicitally tell the compiler what DLL to call, what method to call and what parameters to pass. Since parameter type is very important, you can also explicitly define what type the parameter should be passed to the method as.

Here is an example:

using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

namespace ExternKeyword
{
     public class Program
     {
          static void Main()
          {
               NativeMethods.MessageBoxEx(IntPtr.Zero, "Hello there", "Caption here", 0, 0);
          }
     }
  
     public class NativeMethods
     {
          [DllImport("user32.dll")]
          public static extern MessageBoxEx(IntPtr hWnd, string lpText, string lpCaption, uint uType, short wLanguageId);
     }
}

The [DllImport("user32.dll")] tells the compiler which DLL to reference. Windows searches for files as defined by the PATH environment variable, and therefore will search those paths before failing.

The method is also static because the DLL may not understand how to be "created", as DLLs can be created in different languages. This allows the method to be called directly, instead of being instantiated and then used.


C# Keywords
abstract as base bool break
byte case catch char checked
class const continue decimal default
delegate do double else enum
event explicit extern false finally
fixed float for foreach goto
if implicit in int interface
internal is lock long namespace
new null object operator out
override params private protected public
readonly ref return sbyte sealed
short sizeof stackalloc static string
struct switch this throw true
try typeof uint ulong unchecked
unsafe ushort using var virtual
void volatile while
Special C# Identifiers (Contextual Keywords)
add alias async await dynamic
get global nameof partial remove
set value when where yield
Contextual Keywords (Used in Queries)
ascending by descending equals from
group in into join let
on orderby select where

The false keyword is a boolean constant value.


The keyword finally is used to identify a statement or statement block after a try-catch block for execution regardless of whether the associated try block encountered an exception, and executes even after a return statement. The finally block is used to perform cleanup activities.


The fixed keyword is used to prevent the garbage collector from relocating a variable. You may only use this in an unsafe context.

fixed (int *c = &shape.color) {
  *c = Color.White; 
}

If you are using C# 2.0 or greater, the fixed may also be used to declare a fixed-size array. This is useful when creating code that works with a COM project or DLL.

Your array must be composed of one of the primitive types: bool, byte, char, double, float, int, long, sbyte, short, ulong, or ushort.

protected fixed int monthDays[12];


The float keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Single. That is, it represents a IEEE 754, 32-bit signed binary floating point number whose value is negative 0, positive 0, negative infinity, positive infinity, not a number, or a number ranging either from to or from to .


The for keyword identifies a for loop.


The foreach keyword identifies a foreach loop.

// example of foreach to iterate over an array
public static void Main() {
  int[] scores = new int [] { 54, 78, 34, 88, 98, 12 };

    int total = 0;
  foreach (int score in scores) {
      total += score;
  }

  int averageScore = total/scores.Length;
}


The goto keyword returns the flow of operation to the label which follows it. Labels can be created by putting a colon after any word. e.g.

thelabel:       // This is a label
 System.Console.WriteLine("Blah blah blah");
 goto thelabel; // Program flow returns to thelabel

The use of goto is very controversial, because, when used frivolously, it creates code that jumps from place to place and is disorganized and hard to read. It is rarely even necessary because the same thing can often be accomplished with a more organized for loop or while loop.

The if keyword identifies an if statement with the following syntax:

if-statement ::= "if" "(" condition ")" if-body ["else" else-body]
condition ::= boolean-expression
if-body ::= statement-or-statement-block
else-body ::= statement-or-statement-block

If the condition evaluates to true, the if-body executes. Curly braces ("{" and "}") allow the if-body to contain more than one statement. Optionally, an else clause can immediately follow the if-body, providing code to execute when the condition is false. Making the else-body another if statement creates the common cascade of if, else if, else if, else if, else statements:

using System;

public class IfStatementSample
{
    public void IfMyNumberIs()
    {
        int myNumber = 5;
        if (myNumber == 4)
            Console.WriteLine("This will not be shown because myNumber is not 4.");
        else if(myNumber < 0)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("This will not be shown because myNumber is not negative.");
        }
        else if(myNumber%2 == 0)
            Console.WriteLine("This will not be shown because myNumber is not even.");
        else
        {
            Console.WriteLine("myNumber does not match the coded conditions, so this sentence will be shown!");
        }
    }
}

The boolean expression used in an if statement typically contains one or more of the following operators:

Operator Meaning Operator Meaning
< less than > greater than
== equal to != not equal to
<= less than or equal to >= greater than or equal to
&& and || or
! not

See also else.

General

[edit | edit source]

When values are cast implicitally, the runtime does not need any casting in code by the developer in order for the value to be converted to its new type.

Here is an example, where the developer is casting explicitly:

// Example of explicit casting.
float fNumber = 100.00f;
int iNumber = (int) fNumber;

The developer has told the runtime, "I know what I'm doing, force this conversion."

Implicit casting means that runtime doesn't need any prompting in order to do the conversion. Here is an example of this.

// Example of implicit casting.
byte bNumber = 10;
int iNumber = bNumber;

Notice that no casting was necessary by the developer. What is special about implicit is that the context that the type is converted to is totally lossless, i.e. converting to this type loses no information. So, it can be converted back without worry.

Keyword

[edit | edit source]

The keyword implicit is used for a type to define how to can be converted implicitly. It is used to define what types can be converted to without the need for explicit casting.

As an example, let us take a Fraction class, that will hold a nominator (the number at the top of the division), and a denominator (the number at the bottom of the division). We will add a property so that the value can be converted to a float.

public class Fraction
{
     private int nominator;
     private int denominator;

     public Fraction(int nominator1, int denominator1)
     {
          nominator = nominator1;
          denominator = denominator1;
     }

     public float Value { get { return (float)_nominator/(float)_denominator; } }

     public static implicit operator float(Fraction f)
     {
          return f.Value;
     }

     public override string ToString()
     {
          return _nominator + "/" + _denominator;
     }
}

public class Program
{
    [STAThread]
     public static void Main(string[] args)
     {
          Fraction fractionClass = new Fraction(1, 2);
          float number = fractionClass;

          Console.WriteLine("{0} = {1}", fractionClass, number);
     }
}

To re-iterate, the value it implicitally casts to must hold data in the form that the original class can be converted back to. If this is not possible, and the range is narrowed (like converting double to int), use the explicit operator.


The in keyword identifies the collection to enumerate in a foreach loop.

The in keyword may also be used in a query, e.g., 'from item in dataset'. Immediately following the contextual keyword from is a range variable representing one item in the dataset. The dataset to be queried is defined immediately following the contextual keyword in. See also ascending, descending, in, orderby, select, and where.


The int keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Int32. That is, it represents a 32-bit signed integer whose value ranges from -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647.


The interface keyword is used to declare an interface. Interfaces provide a construct for a programmer to create types that can have methods, properties, delegates, events, and indexers declared, but not implemented.

It is a good programming practice to give interfaces differing names from classes that start with an I and/or finish with ...able, like IRun or Runnable or IRunnable.


The internal keyword is an access modifier used in field, method, and property declarations to make the field, method, or property internal to its enclosing assembly. That is, it is only visible within the assembly that implements it.


The is keyword compares an object to a type, and if they're the same or of the same "kind" (the object inherits the type), returns true. The keyword is therefore used to check for type compatibility, usually before casting (converting) a source type to a destination type in order to ensure that won't cause a type-cast exception to be thrown. Using is on a null variable always returns false.

This code snippet shows a sample usage:

System.IO.StreamReader reader = new StreamReader("readme.txt");
bool b = reader is System.IO.TextReader;

// b is now set to true, because StreamReader inherits TextReader


The lock keyword allows a section of code to exclusively use a resource, a feature useful in multi-threaded applications. If a lock to the specified object is already held when a piece of code tries to lock the object, the code's thread is blocked until the object is available.

using System;
using System.Threading;

class LockDemo
{
    private static int number = 0;
    private static object lockObject = new object();
    
    private static void DoSomething()
    {
        while (true)
        {
            lock (lockObject)
            {
                int originalNumber = number;
                
                number += 1;
                Thread.Sleep((new Random()).Next(1000)); // sleep for a random amount of time
                number += 1;
                Thread.Sleep((new Random()).Next(1000)); // sleep again
                
                Console.Write("Expecting number to be " + (originalNumber + 2).ToString());
                Console.WriteLine(", and it is: " + number.ToString());
                // without the lock statement, the above would produce unexpected results, 
                // since the other thread may have added 2 to the number while we were sleeping.
            }
        }
    }
    
    public static void Main()
    {
        Thread t = new Thread(new ThreadStart(DoSomething));
        
        t.Start();
        DoSomething(); // at this point, two instances of DoSomething are running at the same time.
    }
}

The parameter to the lock statement must be an object reference, not a value type:

class LockDemo2
{
    private int number;
    private object obj = new object();
    
    public void DoSomething()
    {
        lock (this) // ok
        {
            ...
        }
        
        lock (number) // not ok, number is not a reference
        {
            ...
        }
        
        lock (obj) // ok, obj is a reference
        {
            ...
        }
    }
}


The long keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Int64. That is, it represents a 64-bit signed integer whose value ranges from -9,223,372,036,854,775,808 to 9,223,372,036,854,775,807.


The namespace keyword is used to supply a namespace for class, structure, and type declarations.


The new keyword has two different meanings:

  1. It is an operator that requests a new instance of the class identified by its argument.
  2. It is a modifier that explicitly hides a member.

As an example, see the code below:

public class Car
{
    public void go()
    {
    }
}

Car theCar = new Car();       // The new operator creates a Car instance

int i = new int();            // Identical to … = 0;

public class Lamborghini : Car
{
    public new void go()      // Hides Car.go() with this method
    {
    }
}


The null keyword represents an empty value for a reference type variable, i.e. for a variable of any type derived from System.Object. In C# 2.0, null also represents the empty value for nullable value type variables.


The object keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Object. That is, it represents the base class from which all other reference types derive. On some platforms, the size of the reference is 32 bits, while on other platforms it is 64 bits.


The operator keyword allows a class to overload arithmetic and cast operators:

public class Complex
{
    private double re, im;
    
    public double Real
    {
        get { return re; }
        set { re = value; }
    }
    
    public double Imaginary
    {
        get { return im; }
        set { im = value; }
    }
    
    // binary operator overloading
    public static Complex operator +(Complex c1, Complex c2)
    {
        return new Complex() { Real = c1.Real + c2.Real, Imaginary = c1.Imaginary + c2.Imaginary };
    }
    
    // unary operator overloading
    public static Complex operator -(Complex c)
    {
        return new Complex() { Real = -c.Real, Imaginary = -c.Imaginary };
    }
    
    // cast operator overloading (both implicit and explicit)
    public static implicit operator double(Complex c)
    {
        // return the modulus: sqrt(x^2 + y^2)
        return Math.Sqrt(Math.Pow(c.Real, 2) + Math.Pow(c.Imaginary, 2));
    }
    
    public static explicit operator string(Complex c)
    {
        // we should be overloading the ToString() method, but this is just a demonstration
        return c.Real.ToString() + " + " + c.Imaginary.ToString() + "i";
    }
}

public class StaticDemo
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Complex number1 = new Complex() { Real = 1, Imaginary = 2 };
        Complex number2 = new Complex() { Real = 4, Imaginary = 10 };
        Complex number3 = number1 + number2; // number3 now has Real = 5, Imaginary = 12
        
        number3 = -number3; // number3 now has Real = -5, Imaginary = -12
        double testNumber = number3; // testNumber will be set to the absolute value of number3
        Console.WriteLine((string)number3); // This will print "-5 + -12i".
        // The cast to string was needed because that was an explicit cast operator.
    }
}

The out keyword explicitly specifies that a variable should be passed by reference to a method, and set in that method. A variable using this keyword must not be intialized before the method call to ensure the developer understand its intended effects. Using this keyword requires the called method to set the variable using this modifier before returning. Using out also requires the developer to specify the keyword even in the calling code, to ensure that it is easily visible to developers reading the code that the variable will have its value changed elsewhere, which is useful when analyzing the program flow.

An example of passing a variable with out follows:

void CallingMethod()
{
    int i;
    SetDependingOnTime(out i);
    // i is now 10 before/at 12 am, or 20 after
}

void SetDependingOnTime(out int iValue)
{
    iValue = DateTime.Now.Hour <= 12 ? 10 : 20;
}


C# Keywords
abstract as base bool break
byte case catch char checked
class const continue decimal default
delegate do double else enum
event explicit extern false finally
fixed float for foreach goto
if implicit in int interface
internal is lock long namespace
new null object operator out
override params private protected public
readonly ref return sbyte sealed
short sizeof stackalloc static string
struct switch this throw true
try typeof uint ulong unchecked
unsafe ushort using var virtual
void volatile while
Special C# Identifiers (Contextual Keywords)
add alias async await dynamic
get global nameof partial remove
set value when where yield
Contextual Keywords (Used in Queries)
ascending by descending equals from
group in into join let
on orderby select where

The keyword override is use in declaring an overridden function, which extends a base class function of the same name.

Further reading

The keyword params is used to describe when a grouping of parameters are passed to a method, but the number of parameters are not important, as they may vary. Since the number isn't important, the params keyword must be the last variable in a method signature so that the compiler can deal with the parameters which have been defined first, before dealing with the params.

Here are examples of where it will, and will not work:

// This works
public static void AddToShoppingBasket(decimal total, params string[] items)
{
  // ....
}

// This works
public static void AddToShoppingBasket(decimal total, int totalQuantity, params string[] items)
{
  // ....
}


// THIS DOES NOT WORK                  <-------------------->
public static void AddToShoppingBasket(params string[] items, decimal total, int totalQuantity)
{
  // ....
}

A good example of this is the String.Format method. The String.Format method allows a user to pass in a string formatted to their requirements, and then many parameters for the values to insert into the string. Here is an example:

public static string FormatMyString(string format, params string[] values)
{
     string myFormat = "Date: {0}, Time: {1}, WeekDay: {1}";
     return String.Format(myFormat, DateTime.Now.ToShortDateString(), DateTime.Now.ToShortTimeString(), DateTime.Now.DayOfWeek);
}

// Output will be something like:
//
// Date: 7/8/2007, Time: 13:00, WeekDay: Tuesday;
//

The String.Format method has taken a string, and replaced the {0}, {1}, {2} with the 1st, 2nd and 3rd parameters. If the params keyword did not exist, then the String.Format() would need an infinite number of overloads to cater for each case.

public string Format(string format, string param1)
{
  // .....
}

public string Format(string format, string param1, string param2)
{
  // .....
}

public string Format(string format, string param1, string param2, string param3)
{
  // .....
}

public string Format(string format, string param1, string param2, string param3, string param4)
{
  // .....
}

public string Format(string format, string param1, string param2, string param3, string param4, string param5)
{
  // .....
}

// To infinitum


The private keyword is used in field, method, and property declarations to make the field, method, or property private to its enclosing class. That is, it is not visible outside of its class.


The protected keyword is used in field, method, and property declarations to make the field, method, or property protected to its enclosing class. That is, it is not visible outside of its class.


The public keyword is used in field, method, and property declarations to make the field, method, or property public to its enclosing class. That is, it is visible from any class.


The readonly keyword is closely related to the const keyword at a glance, with the exception of allowing a variable with this modifier to be initialized in a constructor, along with being associated with a class instance (object) rather than the class itself.

The primary use for this keyword is to allow the variable to take on different values depending on which constructor was called, in case the class has many, while still ensuring the developer that it can never intentionally or unintentionally be changed in the code once the object has been created.

This is a sample usage, assumed to be in a class called SampleClass:

readonly string s;

SampleClass()
{
    s = "Hello!";
}


The ref keyword explicitly specifies that a variable should be passed by reference rather than by value.

A developer may wish to pass a variable by reference particularly in case of value types. If a variable is passed by reference, only a pointer is sent to a function in reality, reducing the cost of a method call in case it would involve copying large amounts of data, something C# does when normally passing value types.

Another common reason to pass a variable by reference is to let the called method modify its value. Because this is allowed, C# always enforces specifying that a value is passed by reference even in the method call, something many other programming languages don't. This let developers reading the code easily spot places that can imply a type has had its value changed in a method, which is useful when analyzing the program flow.

Passing a value by reference does not imply that the called method has to modify the value; see the out keyword for this.

Passing by reference requires the passed variable to be initialized.

An example of passing a variable by reference follows:

void CallingMethod()
{
    int i = 24;
    if (DoubleIfEven(ref i))
        Console.WriteLine("i was doubled to {0}", i); // outputs "i was doubled to 48"
}

bool DoubleIfEven(ref int iValue)
{
    if (iValue%2 == 0)
    {
        iValue *= 2;
        return true;
    }
    return false;
}


The return keyword is used to return execution from a method or from a property accessor. If the method or property accessor has a return type, the return keyword is followed by the value to return.


The sbyte keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.SByte. That is, it represents an 8-bit signed integer whose value ranges from -128 to 127.


The sealed keyword is used to specify that a class cannot be inherited from. The following example shows the context in which it may be used:

public sealed class
{
    ...
}

Notice: The sealed class inheritance is the same as that of a final class in Java.


The short keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.Int16. That is, it represents a 16-bit signed integer whose value ranges from -32,768 to 32,767.

The sizeof keyword returns how many bytes an object requires to be stored.

An example usage:

int i = 123456;

Console.WriteLine("Storing i, a {0}, requires {1} bytes, or {2} bits.",
i.GetType(), sizeof(i), sizeof(i)*8);

// outputs "Storing i, a System.Int32, requires 4 bytes, or 32 bits."

The keyword stackalloc is used in an unsafe code context to allocate a block of memory on the stack.

int* fib = stackalloc int[100];

In the example above, a block of memory of sufficient size to contain 100 elements of type int is allocated on the stack, not the heap; the address of the block is stored in the pointer fib. This memory is not subject to garbage collection and therefore does not have to be pinned (via fixed). The lifetime of the memory block is limited to the lifetime of the method in which it is defined (there is no way to free the memory before the method returns).

stackalloc is only valid in local variable initializers.

Because Pointer types are involved, stackalloc requires unsafe context. See Unsafe Code and Pointers.

stackalloc is similar to _alloca in the C run-time library.

Note* - From MSDN


The static keyword is used to declare a class or a class member (method, property, field, or variable) as static. A class that is declared static has only static members, and these are associated with the entire class instead of class instances.


The string keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for System.String. That is, it indicates an immutable sequence of characters.


The struct keyword declares a structure, i.e. a value type that functions as a light-weight class.


The switch statement is a control statement that handles multiple selections and enumerations by passing control to one of the case statements within its body.

This is an example of a switch statement:

int currentAge = 18;

switch (currentAge)
{
case 16:
    Console.WriteLine("You can drive!");
    break;
case 18:
    Console.WriteLine("You're finally an adult!");
    break;
default:
    Console.WriteLine("Nothing exciting happened this year.");
    break;
}
Console Output
You're finally an adult! 	


The this keyword is used in an instance method or instance property to refer to the current class instance. That is, this refers to the object through which its containing method or property was invoked. It is also used to define extension methods.


The throw keyword is used to throw an exception object.

The true keyword is a Boolean constant value. Therefore

 while(true)

would create an infinite loop.


The try keyword is used to identify a statement or statement block as the body of an exception handling sequence. The body of the exception handling sequence must be followed by a catch clause, a finally clause, or both.

try 
{
    foo();
} 
catch(Exception Exc)
{
    throw new Exception ("this is the error message", Exc);
}

The typeof keyword returns an instance of the System.Type class when passed a name of a class. It is similar to the sizeof keyword in that it returns a value instead of starting a section (block) of code (see if, try, while).

An example:

using System;

namespace MyNamespace
{
    class MyClass
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Type t = typeof(int);
            Console.Out.WriteLine(t.ToString());
            Console.In.Read();
        }
    }
}

The output will be:

System.Int32

It should be noted that unlike sizeof, only class names themselves and not variables can be passed to typeof as shown here:

using System;

namespace MyNamespace
{
    class MyClass2
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            char ch;
            
            // This line will cause compilation to fail
            Type t = typeof(ch);
            Console.Out.WriteLine(t.ToString());
            Console.In.Read();
        }
    }
}

Sometimes, classes will include their own GetType() method that will be similar, if not identical, to typeof.


The uint keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.UInt32. That is, it represents a 32-bit unsigned integer whose value ranges from 0 to 4,294,967,295.


The ulong keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.UInt64. That is, it represents a 64-bit unsigned integer whose value ranges from 0 to 18,446,744,073,709,551,615.

</noinclude>

The unchecked keyword prevents overflow-checking when doing integer arithmetics. It may be used as an operator on a single expression or as a statement on a whole block of code.

int x, y, z;
x = 1222111000;
y = 1222111000;

// used as an operator
z = unchecked(x*y);

// used as a statement
unchecked {
  z = x*y;
  x = z*z;
}


The unsafe keyword may be used to modify a procedure or define a block of code which uses unsafe code. Code is unsafe if it uses the "address of" (&) or pointer operator (*).

In order for the compiler to compile code containing this keyword, you must use the unsafe option when using the Microsoft C-Sharp Compiler.

class MyClass {
  public static void Main() {
    int x = 2;
    // example of unsafe to modify a code block
    unsafe {
      DoSomething(&x);
    }
  }

  // example of unsafe to modify a procedure
  unsafe static void DoSomething(int *msg) {
    Console.WriteLine(*msg);
  }
}


The ushort keyword is used in field, method, property, and variable declarations and in cast and typeof operations as an alias for the .NET Framework structure System.UInt16. That is, it represents a 16-bit unsigned integer whose value ranges from 0 to 65,535.


The using keyword has two completely unrelated meanings in C#, depending on if it is used as a directive or a statement.

The directive

[edit | edit source]

using as a directive resolves unqualified type references so that a developer doesn't have to specify the complete namespace.

Example:

using System;
 
// A developer can now type ''Console.WriteLine();'' rather than ''System.Console.WriteLine()''.

using can also provide a namespace alias for referencing types.

Example:

using utils = Company.Application.Utilities;

The statement

[edit | edit source]

using as a statement automatically calls the dispose on the specified object. The object must implement the IDisposable interface. It is possible to use several objects in one statement as long as they are of the same type.

Example:

using (System.IO.StreamReader reader = new StreamReader("readme.txt"))
{
    // read from the file
}
 
// The file readme.txt has now been closed automatically.

using (Font headerFont = new Font("Arial", 12.0f),
            textFont = new Font("Times New Roman", 10.0f))
{
    // Use headerFont and textFont.
}

// Both font objects are closed now.


The var keyword can be used in place of a type when declaring a variable to allow the compiler to infer the type of the variable. This feature can be used to shorten variable declarations, especially when instantiating generic types, and is even necessary with LINQ expressions (since queries may generate very complex types).

The following:

int num = 123;
string str = "asdf";
Dictionary<int, string> dict = new Dictionary<int, string>();

is equivalent to:

var num = 123;
var str = "asdf";
var dict = new Dictionary<int, string>();

var does not create a "variant" type; the type is simply inferred by the compiler. In situations where the type cannot be inferred, the compiler generates an error:

var str; // no assignment, can't infer type

void Function(var arg1, var arg2) // can't infer type
{
    ...
}

Note: Var is not a keyword


The keyword virtual is applied to a method declaration to indicate that the method may be overridden in a subclass. If the virtual keyword is not applied and a method is defined in a subclass with the same signature as the one in the parent class, the method in the parent class is hidden by the subclass implementation. With other words, it is only possible to have a true polymorphism of functions with this keyword.

Notice: Comparing it with Java, a method is not virtual if and only if it is final. This is the result of different design philosophies.


The void keyword is used in method signatures to declare a method that does not return a value. A method declared with the void return type cannot provide any arguments to any return statements they contain.

Example:

public void WorkRepeatedly (int numberOfTimes)
{
    for(int i = 0; i < numberOfTimes; i++)
        if(EarlyTerminationIsRequested)
            return;
        else
            DoWork();
}


The volatile keyword is used to declare a variable that may change its value over time due to modification by an outside process, the system hardware, or another concurrently running thread.

You should use this modifier in your member variable declaration to ensure that whenever the value is read, you are always getting the most recent (up-to-date) value of the variable.

class MyClass
{
  public volatile long systemclock;
}


This keyword has been part of the C# programming language since .NET Framework 1.1 (Visual Studio 2003).


The while keyword identifies a while loop.

Special C# Identifiers


The add and remove keywords allow you to execute code whenever a delegate is added or removed from an event. Its usage is similar to the get and set keywords with properties:

public event MyDelegateType MyEvent
{
    add
    {
        // here you can use the keyword "value" to access the delegate that is being added
        ...
    }
    
    remove
    {
        // here you can use the keyword "value" to access the delegate that is being removed
        ...
    }
}

The code in the add block will be executed when a delegate is added to the event. Similarly, the code in the remove block will be executed when a delegate is removed from the event.


The alias keyword is used to indicate an external alias.

When you need to use several versions of the same assembly or assemblies with the same full qualified typenames, you need to use the alias and extern keywords to give different alias names for each version.

Example:

extern alias AppTools;
extern alias AppToolsV2;

To use the typenames of each version, you have the operator :: .

Example:

AppTools::MainTool tool_v1 = new AppTools::MainTool();
AppToolsV2::MainTool tool_v2 = new AppToolsV2::MainTool();

However, this only says to the compiler that there are several assemblies with typename conflicts. To relate what of each assemblies match's the alias name, you have to tell the compiler on its options apart the source. On dotNet command line, this options would be:

/r:AppTools=AppToolsv100.dll /r:AppToolsV2=AppToolsv200.dll

Notice: In order for it to be of use, you need to provide an external assembly to the compiler (e.g. pass /r:EXTALIAS=XXX.dll) and identify the external alias within the code (e.g. extern alias EXTALIAS;)


The special identifier get is used to declare the read accessor for a property.


The global keyword is useful in some contexts to resolve ambiguity between identifiers. If you have a conflict between a class name and a namespace, for example, you can use the global keyword to access the namespace:

namespace MyApp
{
    public static class System
    {
        public static void Main()
        {
            global::System.Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!");
            // if we had just used System.Console.WriteLine, 
            // the compile would think that we referred to a 
            // class named "Console" inside our "System" class.
        }
    }
}

global does not work in the following situation, however, as our System class does not have a namespace:

public static class System
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        global::System.Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!");
        // "System" doesn't have a namespace, so the above
        // would be referring to this class!
    }
}


The special identifier partial is used to allow developers to build classes from different files and have the compiler generate one class, combining all the partial classes. This is mostly useful for separating classes into separate blocks. For example, Visual Studio 2005 separates the UI code for forms into a separate partial class that allows you to work on the business logic separately.


The special identifier set is used to declare the write accessor for a property.


The special identifier value is used in a property's write accessor to represent the value requested for assignment to the property.


The where keyword has two different meanings:

  1. It is used to specify one or more constraints on generic type parameters.
  2. With LINQ, it is used to query a data source and select or filter elements to return.


The yield keyword returns the next value from an iterator or ends an iteration.

Notes

[edit | edit source]

The reference list of C# keywords is at [2].

References

[edit | edit source]